Satu, dapat beri pendapatan lumayan kepada peniaga kecil. Dua, dapat beri pilihan kepada pelajar yang sentiasa lapar, terutama di tengah malam waktu kedai dah tutup. Tiga, peniaga tak perlu upah pekerja untuk tunggu di gerai. Empat, sewa lokasi mesin vending ditanggung kerajaan. Lima, peniaga tidak perlu bayar sewa mesin vending, juga turut ditanggung kerajaan. Power dak? Tahun 2024, akan lebih banyak mesin vending IPR dibuka di seluruh negara. Kepada yang dah mohon, saya doakan ada rezeki hampa. Kalau dapat peluang, jangan sia-siakan. Insya Allah, dengan kerja kuat, Allah akan bantu permudahkan. Terbaik Kementerian Ekonomi dan Menteri Ekonomi YB Rafizi Ramli ! *Aku share juga mulut huduh Sanusi mengenai mesin vending IPR.

AFFORD INCREASING WAGES OF ITS EMPLOYEES - THE CIVIL SERVANTS? Should the increase of wages be limited to just the Federal Government workers that earn less than RM4,000? Bureaucracy. Malaysia's bureaucracy is one of the biggest in the world, with 1.7 million civil servants to a population of 32 million, a ratio of 4.5% compared with Singapore's ratio of 1.5% civil servants to total population, Hong Kong's 2.3% and Taiwan's ratio of 2.3%. Why so HIGH? Some say it was because Malaysia's graduates did not have the needed quality to be attractive to the Private Sector, and hence the government absorbed many who were sent on scholarship and government loans into the civil service. Some were even absorbed as teachers, without the required skills and interest - and it has affected the education system.. REMEMBER the Malaysian Federal Debt(Liabilities) is about RM1.5 Trillion. Remember that the Malaysian Household debts, i.e. the current personal debt of individual Malaysians also is more than RM1.5 Trillion. No 'Raya Aid' for the private sector workers, self employed or the POOR - just for civil servants and government pensioners? RM1.5 trillion debt? borrow and spend as normal? Debt service charges HIGHER than operating expenditure? In 2023, the Federal Government allocated RM46. 1 billion or 15.2% of revenue (2022: RM41. 3 billion; 14%) for debt service charges (DSC). Despite the high number of government employees, the government still have contracted out services like cleaning, security guards, school wardens, etc.. MINIMUM Wages was last increased from RM1,200 to RM1,500 was in May 2022 , and possibly relying on facts and situation in Malaysia in January 2022 or even earlier. The last time the government reviewed the minimum wage was in May 2022, increasing it from RM1,200 to RM1,500. BUYING POWER or monies value had significantly declined because of the declining value of the Malaysian Ringgit... January 2022 - 1 USD = 4.1725 MYR May 2022 - 1 USD = 4.3535 MYR Apr 2024 - 1 USD = about 4.8 Therefore the Buying power of the Ringgit - you need more Ringgit to buy things Say, you needed RM1000 in January 2022, in May 2022 you needed RM1043, and today in 2024 we would need RM1151 to buy the same thing that cost RM1,000 in January 2022. When the Ringgit dropped - prices for everything increased. Why? Because even those whose product or services cost did not increase - they now needed more money to compensate for the increase in cost of living. YES, the government can come in with SUBSIDIES to ensure people can still afford to buy the same things at the 'same price' in 2022 - but that cannot solve the problem as subsidies can cover only some items - In the market, the price of kambing, beef, fish, pork, ayam kampung, Ipoh Chicken, etc had all sky rocketed...so more people simply could not buy it as the price increased but not INCOME. Subsidies means the GOVERNMENT must spend more - compensate the manufacturer, middle man and seller of products and services. How much did the Government spend for the TOL Free days during festivals? At a minimum, what the government could have done was to INCREASE THE MINIMUM WAGE accordingly - no need to wait for several years and adjust Minimum Wages. When cost of living rises for whatever reason, immediately(or within weeks), increase the MINIMUM WAGE. Sadly, many employers simply pay the Minimum Wages when they ought to pay their workers more... Now, this PM Anwar Ibrahim led Pakatan Harapan led coalition government again is giving the impression that Minimum Wage can only be reviewed once every TWO(2) years - BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE. Minimum Wages can be increased at any time... Section 25(1) NATIONAL WAGES CONSULTATIVE COUNCIL ACT 2011 says ' (1) The Council shall, at least once in every two years , review the minimum wages order.' It says 'at least once in every 2 years' - that means that there can be more reviews, any number of reviews. What the ACT is saying is that at a minimum, it must be once every 2 years. Given the current situation in Malaysia, there must be REVIEWS and new Minimum Wages every time the cost of living rises for whatever reason so that Malaysians and workers can at least earn a MINIMUM Wage sufficient to meet the living expenses of themselves and their family/dependents. If these poorest of workers cannot earn sufficient, they may be forced to borrow from ALONGS(illegal Money Lenders) , for sadly in Malaysia the poor simply cannot borrow money from Banks or even the Government for not financial institutions will give loans to anyone with no security(property or a REGULAR EMPLOYMENT). Look at Section 25(2) of the Act that says, ' (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the Council may, on its own accord or upon the direction of the Government , review the minimum wages order. Yes, if the Wage Council is not acting - then all it needs is for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to tell them to do the needed to immediately increase the Minimum Wage. But, Anwar and his government did not do this.. So, the Prime Minister who could at any time act causing the MINIMUM WAGE to be increased failed to do so.. . Remember, on 1/5/2023(last year), our Prime Minister said, ' The issue of minimum wage will be settled by next month, says Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.' Workers expected an increase of Minimum Wage in a month - but almost 12 months down the road, the Minimum Wage is still not increased. Claps and applause to "FAKE PROMISES" or fake insinuations, but despite increasing cost of living, Anwar failed to INCREASE Minimum Wage sooner...and now his Minister is still talking about reviewing - not INCREASING Minimum Wage. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) had stated that for Kuala Lumpur, the living wage for a single adult was RM2,700 (in 2018) , and for a childless couple, it would be RM4,500. The living wage for a couple with two children would be RM6,500. One dirty 'strategy' that seems to have been employed by governments of the past is to increase Federal MINIMUM wage across the board, affecting also the small businessman like sellers at fresh markets, small shops that barely survive, fishermen, farmers, etc... By lumping all employers together - there will be massive protest especially from these small employers who can currently hardly survive.. So, I suggest:- INCREASE MINIMUM WAGE - but not applicable across the Board. For the very small business people, fisherman, farmers, etc that have annual profits LESS Than RM100,000 should be excluded. For these small employers, maybe a profit sharing scheme with workers should be proposed > sharing say 50% of their profits with their current employees. In this way, these smaller employers may be able to SURVIVE - they simply may not be able to pay any higher wages otherwise. Profit sharing with labour is the way forward. Another FLAW with Malaysia's Minimum Wage orders of past, although the ACT provides already flexibility.. "b) the coverage of the recommended minimum wages rates according to sectors, types of employment and regional areas; (c) the non-application of the recommended minimum wages rates and coverage to any sectors, types of employment and regional areas or to any person or class of persons;...(Sec. 22) " ONE Minimum Wage rate for all. Different Minimum Wage depending on region and having sight of the needed cost of living there... Well, the cost of living in different places/towns/areas differ - living in a smaller town for example one can rent houses at a much lower rate - this should have been taken into account. So, different MINIMUM WAGE for different areas based on the differing cost of living... Now, certain work is not attracting Malaysian workers as it is TOUGH, work under the Sun, manual work... THEREFORE a Higher MINIMUM WAGE for these kind of hard work - 3D work (Dirty, Dangerous and Demeaning) - Higher MINIMUM WAGES will attract Malaysian workers - say a Minimum Wage of RM2000 or RM2500? After all there are currently MORE THAN HALF A MILLION Malaysians that are unemployed. Malaysia's unemployment rate remained at 3.3% in January 2024 , with the number of unemployed persons declining further to 567,300 from 567,800 in December 2023, says the Statistics Department of Malaysia - Star, 8/3/2024 Malaysia must prioritize the employment of Malaysians - before allowing the entry of migrant workers, who may be attractive because migrant workers are easily exploited, cheated, oppressed with little or no means to claim justice in Malaysia as migrant workers are speedily 'forced out' from Malaysia so their claims and cases for justice and human rights cannot start or be continued in Malaysia...' Usually, the market determines the WAGES of workers - which means worker wages will increase. This was SABOTAGED when Malaysia made it easy for employers to bring in MIGRANT WORKERS. The effect the wages were kept low - even for Malaysian workers. As an example, in the construction industry previously, wages were determined according to experience and skill of the worker, and higher skilled worker could get higher wages. With the bringing in of migrant workers, Malaysian workers left as they were unwilling to work for such low wages, as most employers simply paid 'minimum wages'. Some of the Malaysian workers became independent contractors and started taking on small construction work to survive - but then government and some politicians started using only their 'friend' contractors or contractors that were 'politically connected' - and may even Bumiputra contractors had no choice but to shut down operations. It is sad that for the government, the primary issue for workers had been 'Minimum Wage' - and this is such a narrow thinking. Workers in Malaysia also still do not enjoy 'REGULAR EMPLOYMENT' but only 'contract employment' or 'short-term contract employment'. This state of affairs is very BAD for workers - and they cannot even fight for better wages and better working conditions, or even form Trade Unions. Most who start fighting for worker rights find themselves out of a job. The Human Resource Minister has the power to ensure that Section 2A of the Employment Act says ' (1) The Minister may by order prohibit the employment, engagement or contracting of any person or class of persons to carry out work in any occupation in any agricultural or industrial undertaking, constructional work, statutory body, local government authority, trade, business or place of work other than under a contract of service entered into with- (a) the principal or owner of that agricultural or industrial undertaking, constructional work, trade, business or place of work; or (b) that statutory body or that authority. So, simply the Minister can ensure that all workers are working with their REAL employer who has full control of the workplace. End usage of workers of other contractors at the workplace. No more outsourced workers PLEASE. Likewise the government can put an end of SHORT-TERM Employment Contracts . Now, many employer simply do not renew the short-term employment contract despite there still being work that requires workers. Then, the employer simply hires a NEW worker. Employers must be prevented from doing this, and the law should require employers to use the same worker until the work requiring the worker cease to exist. If Malaysia insists on REGULAR EMPLOYMENT for all workers - even when the work requiring the worker ends. The law requires the employer to find other work which the worker can do. If there is none, then the employer has the right to RETRENCH, and the worker has the right to receive RETRENCHMENT BENEFITS . Hence, there is really no prejudice to the Employer, but it improves EMPLOYMENT SECURITY for the worker. There is so much that the Malaysian government can do for workers if PM Anwar Ibrahim and his government has the intention to help workers. PM Anwar: Proposal to improve salary of civil servants to be announced at Labour Day gathering Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim chairs the Meeting No 3/2024 of the Public Service Remuneration System (SSPA) Review Main Committee meeting, April 19, 2024. Picture from X/Anwar Ibrahim Friday, 19 Apr 2024 7:13 PM MYT KUALA LUMPUR, April 19 Proposals for improvement, including efforts to increase the net income rate of civil servants, will be announced by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim at the Labour Day rally to be held later. Anwar, in his Facebook post, said the Meeting No 3/2024 of the Public Service Remuneration System (SSPA) Review Main Committee, which he chaired today to discuss the salary structure of civil servants further, has almost finalised improvements related to the matter. Anwar, who is also finance minister, said the matter would then be decided at the Cabinet meeting. I wish to emphasise the governments commitment to resolving efforts to improve the salary structure of civil servants which have been implemented through the SSPA Review, despite the countrys challenging economic situation due to global geopolitical uncertainty. The government takes this position and responsibility by considering the pressures of cost of living for civil servants, especially those with low income. Hopefully, this effort will motivate civil servants to increase productivity and provide the best service to the people, he said. The prime minister had, when tabling Budget 2024 on October 13 last year, announced that the SSPA would be fully implemented from 2025. Bernama, Malay Mail, 19/4/2024 Unemployment rate stays at 3.3% for January 2024, says Stats Dept Friday, 08 Mar 2024 2:55 PM MYT PUTRAJAYA: Malaysias unemployment rate remained at 3.3% in January 2024, with the number of unemployed persons declining further to 567,300 from 567,800 in December 2023, says the Statistics Department of Malaysia. Chief statistician Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Uzir Mahidin said that based on the Labour Force Statistics for January 2024, the countrys labour market sustained its upward trend, in line with the ongoing improvement of the national economic situation and consistent with global economic expansion. "Therefore, the labour force in January 2024 saw further enhancement, increasing by 0.1% to 17.05 million persons compared to 17.03 million persons the previous month. "The labour force participation rate during the month was unchanged at 70.2%, as in the preceding month. "This positive trend was driven by a continuous increase in the number of employed persons, while the number of unemployed persons declined, he said in a statement Friday (March 8). Mohd Uzir said the number of employed persons increased by 0.2% to record 16.48 million persons compared to 16.46 million in December 2023. Elaborating on the employment situation, he said 75.2% of employed persons in January 2024 were in the employees category, while the own-account workers category continued its increasing trend, rising by 0.3% to 3.01 million persons from three million persons in December. At the same time, Mohd Uzir said the number of employed persons in the service sector remained upward, particularly in the wholesale and retail sector, food and beverage services, and transportation and storage activities. He added that a similar trend was seen in the manufacturing, construction, mining and quarrying sectors in January 2024, while the number of employed persons in the agriculture sector rebounded compared to the previous month. Regarding the unemployment situation, he said 79.8% of the total unemployed persons were those who were available for work and were actively seeking jobs, or the actively unemployed, which posted a decrease of 0.2% to 452,500 persons from 453,600 in December. According to Mohd Uzir, the unemployment rate for youth aged 15 to 24 stood at 10.6% or 306,800 persons, while among youth aged 15 to 30, the rate was 6.7%, with 439,700 unemployed youths. Meanwhile, Mohd Uzir said the economic situation in Malaysia was steady, with higher domestic demand anticipated due to Januarys decline in inflation, a robust job market, and supportive financial positions. Additionally, the increase in tourism may contribute to economic activities, potentially leading to various businesses and job opportunities. "Therefore, the labour market in Malaysia is anticipated to improve and remain stable over the next few months, driven by a resilient domestic economy. "This situation is expected to continue to generate increased demand for employment, thus serving as an important key to sustaining economic stability, he said. - Bernama, Star, 8/3/2024 Minimum wage to be reviewed this year By Hana Naz Harun , Qistina Sallehuddin - March 14, 2024 @ 5:47pm Human Resources Minister Steven Sim Chee Keong saysthe review willbe based on the National Wages Consultative Council Act 2011. - Bernama pic KUALA LUMPUR: The government will review the minimum wage this year, taking into account the views of both employers and employees. Human Resources Minister Steven Sim Chee Keong said the review would be based on the National Wages Consultative Council Act 2011. "For your information, this year, based on the National Wage Consultative Council Act 2011, the minimum wage rate will be reviewed. "We will take into account the views of all parties, including employers and employees, and refer to socio-economic reports such as those from Bank Negara." Sim said this in his winding-up speech on the royal address debate, in a response to Rodiyah Sapiee (Gabungan Parti Sarawak-Batang Sadong). Rodiyah had raised the issue of reviewing the minimum wage, as suggested by the Bank Negara and the Employees' Provident Fund's literacy initiative, Belanjawanku. Yesterday, the Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC) demanded the government to review the minimum wage rate, following the Sales and Services Tax (SST) hike. Its secretary-general Kamarul Baharin Mansor reminded the government that the National Wages Consultative Council Act required a reassessment of the minimum wage every two years. The last time the government reviewed the minimum wage was in May 2022, increasing it from RM1,200 to RM1,500. Last year, the then Human Resources Minister V. Sivakumar said the review of minimum wage by the National Wage Consultation Technical Committee was 80 per cent complete . In January, Economy Minister Rafizi Ramli said he would initiate the process of formulating policies for the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) this year, with the Progressive Wage Policy being one of the components in the five-year plan. He had said the formulation and focus of the policies would be closely related to labour market reforms, and would be developed in collaboration with other ministries involving various components to shape the idea of labour market reforms in the country. - NST, 14/3/2024 PM: Minimum wage issue to be settled by next month By MARTIN CARVALHO and FAZLEENA AZIZ Nation Monday, 01 May 2023 PUTRAJAYA: The issue of minimum wage will be settled by next month, says Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The Prime Minister said the implementation of minimum wage is a big challenge. We will settle all the uproar pertaining to this issue at the Cabinet meeting next month once and for all, he said in his speech at the Labour Day celebration here, on Monday (May 1). On Labour Day last year, the Malaysian Minimum Wages Order 2022 came into effect with the monthly salary of employees fixed at RM1,500. However, its implementation for companies with fewer than five employees has been postponed from Jan 1 to July 1, this year. Anwar acknowledged that there is a need to increase the salaries among workers in Malaysia. The matter should be accepted, and cannot be disputed by any employers, economists or even ministers, he added. We do not want anyone to dispute this matter. The government has a responsibility to accept this fact that we have to increase the wages for civil and private sectors. There are responsible employers but not all are the same. When an employer records a high revenue of up to RM1bil, they did not raise the employees' wages. But there are those who think about the welfare of the workers, their childrens education and providing housing benefits. This is how it should be done, he said. Anwar said when he was the finance minister, Tenanga Nasional Bhd was privatised and went on to make huge profits. He said the company increased its workers' salaries, provided housing benefits to them and set up a university. - Star, 1/5/2023

menggambarkan Anwar seorang politis yang culas, bijak menyelamatkan diri dari situasi terkini, sehingga sanggup menjadi syaitan bisu, apabila berhadapan dengan masalah. Katanya Anwar akan mendiamkan diri, play safe dengan sesuatu keadaan yang belaku dalam rumah tangga sendiri. Sebaliknya Anwar berani hanya mempertahankan pengganas Hamas di Gaza yang jarak 7,600 km darinya. Kenapa penulis itu menyebut Hamas sebagai pengganas, bermakna dia tidak empati kepada Gaza kalaupun bukan simpatis kepada zionis Israel. Penulis itu menyebut isu-isu yang didiamkan Anwar atau cuba melarikan diri, ialah isu kalimah Allah distoking dan dikasut. Katanya Anwar melepas tangan mengatakan, ia isu remeh dan tidak menampakkan kesungguhan dalam bertindak ke atasnya selaku Perdana Menteri. Namun bagi penulis ia besar apabila yang diPertuan Agong memanggil mereka terbabit untuk menghadapnya. Saifuddin Nasution Ismail menteri KDN pula mengatakan ia tidak mahu masuk campur dan menyerahkan kepada pihak PDRM. Bagi seseorang yang tahu Perlembagaan, pembahagian tugas dan peranan serta tanggungjawab, tidak akan mudah melihat PM atau menteri KDN dalam isu sebagai, tidak mempedulikannya. Jauh sekali untuk bersikap mendiamkan diri. Apa perlu difahami, isu-isu berkenaan adalah isu berkaitan dengan agama yang menyangkut langsung dengan Yang diPertuan Agong. Eksekutif, polis dan mahkamah hanya boleh menjalankan penyiasatan dan mahkamah menunggu hasilnya untuk pendakwaan. Isu itu akan disiasat oleh polis dan jika ternyata ada bukti melanggar perlembagaan, atau sebagainya, baru dikenakan tindakan. Di sini tidak timbul PM mendiamkan diri, menteri senyap kerana siasatan telah dibuat. Baik PM atau menteri tidak boleh terus memberi hukuman atau pun nasihat langsung seperti apa boleh dilakukan Yang diPertuan Agong. Isu-isu berkaitan dengan agama ia adalah dibawah bidang kuasa dan prerogatif Majlis Raja-Raja Melayu. Saya kira penulis berkenaan tidak memahami, atau sengaja tidak memahami akan skop peranan dan bidangkuasa ini kerana obses untuk memburuk dan merendahkan Anwar Ibrahim. Kalau dia melihat dari kata mata politik, bagaimana isu kalimah Allah itu didendangkan jelas ia modal murahan politik. Perhati sahaja bagaimana tergesa-gesa Ketua Pemuda Umno memainkan isu sejadah dijadikan alas kaki. Apakah perlu kita membeli dan memakan apa-apa yang dihidangkan di pentas politik tanpa menyelidik makanan atau barangan dijual itu berkualiti atau tidak, halal atau haram, memabukan atau sebagainya? Bodoh dan bangang sangatlah kita, kalau terus menelan tanpa direbus, melainkan kita adalah agen propaganda atau haiwan peliharaan pihak pembangkang. Kepada penulis itu dan mereka sewaktu dengannya elok menukar kanta mata baru tinggal kanta mata lama, untuk melihat peranan dan tanggungjawab Anwar sebagai perdana menteri. Juga, kanta mata perlu ditukar untuk melihat keabstruban (kezenian) politik yang ditunjukkan oleh Anwar dalam negara bermajmuk ini. Saya tegaskan politik Malaysia tidak boleh dilihat secara harfiah. Penulis itu juga akhirnya menimbul isu pengampunan Najib Razak, beliau persoalkan pengampunan tambahan (addendum) seperti yang hebuh diperkatakan sekarang. Sekali lagi dia cuba mengaitkan Anwar disebalik pengurangan hukuman terhadap Najib itu yang dianggap penjahat, sebagai suatu pakatan di antara Anwar dengan Zahid Hamidi dan Umno bagi menyelamat diri masing-masing. Penulis mempersaolkan dan tidak mempedulikan kenyataan awal Anwar mengenai pengampunan itu yang beliau tidak masuk campur. Dia juga cuba merekayasakan perwujudan semula Kementerian Wilayah dengan melantik Dr Zaliha Mustafa sebagai helah Anwar. Sebenarnya tiada guna bercakap atau menyuruh beruk yang tidak pandai memulas kepala, memilih mana yang muda dan mana yang tua, agar diturunkan, kerana ia memeritkan tekak saja. Sia-sia. Jika ikhlas memahami isu pengampuan Najib ini ia sangat mudah, tidak perlu berpolemik panjang lebar. Tentangan Addedum itu Anwar sudah menjelaskan sama ada ia wujud wujud atau disedari setelah mesyuarat Lembaga Pengampunan diadakan. Wajarkah sesuatu yang berada di luar mesyuarat atau tidak dibincangkan (diputus) diambil kira, waima ianya datang dari peribadi Agung atau perdana menteri atau man-mana ahli Lembaga. Apa nyang boleh dipersoalkan, kenapa Yang diPertuan Agong (Al Sultan Abdullah) ketika itu tidak membawa Addedum itu langsung ke dalam mesyuarat dan memutuskan disana, kenapa dijadikan lampiran sebagai tambahan? Kenapa ia menjadi perkara tambahan? Agung hanya bersetuju memberi pengampunan dengan mengurangkan hukuman kepada Najib dari 12 tahun penjara kepada enam tahun, dari RM210 juta kepada RM50 juta. Yang perlu disoalkan kenapa perlu ada tambahan? Bukankah addedum itu sebagai pilihan kepada kerajaan apabila ia dibuat demikian? Tambahan itulah menjadi isu dan polemik sekarang ini yang juga dijuruskan kepada untuk merendah dan mempersalahkan Perdana Menteri, sampai ada mengatakan perdana menteri sebagai bodoh kalau tidak mengetahui syarat tambahan itu. Sebenarnya orang yang cuba membodohkan perdana menteri itu lebih bodoh dan bangang. Bodoh luar dan dalam. Respon dan pandangan saya terhadap artikel yang dikongsikan itu, tampak sangat penulis adalah seorang penyokong PN, dan merupakan orang yang benci dan ada masalah dengan Anwar Ibrahim. Jadi tidak hairanlah kalau dari A sampai Z penulis itu membelasah Anwar. Baginya tidak ada sebesar hama pun kebaikan dan kebenaran Anwar. Beliau juga cuba membawa naratif semasa Mahiaddin dan Ismail Sabri Yaakob jadi PM mereka tidak pun cuba membebaskan Najib, mengurangkan hukuman. Apabila ia berlaku kepada Anwar, penulis itu melihat ada pakatan antara Anwar dengan Zahid dan Umno? Seperkara disebut penulis yang bermaksud cuba menunjukkan Anwar tidak bersetuju Najib dibebaskan, apabila ia membuat ramalan sekiranya Najib keluar dari penjara maka akan berbodong-bodonglah orang PKR akan menyertai Perikatan Nasional. Konon itu yang ditakuti Anwar. Jelas penulis tidak mengenali hati budi dan semangat waja orang-orang PKR, (reformis) mereka bukan sehari dua berjuang mempertahankan Anwar, tetapi lebih suku abad. Bagi mereka seribu kali orang membenci Anwar, sejuta kali mereka menyayanginya. Bagi mereka, mereka tidak kira apakah budi perjuangan untuk membela dan mempertahankan Anwar, dikenang atau atau tidak, yang penting mereka BAHAGIA kerana dapat mengangkat Anwar sebagai perdana menteri. [wm.kl. 10:51 am 24/04/2024].

benar Pas ada prinsip apakah peranan Pas dalam menyelamatkan rakyat Palestin. Tok Dor kemukalah solusi atau lebih afdal tubuh tentera sendiri dan hantar ke Gaza. Masa jadi Duta Timur Tengah duku apa peranan signifikan Tok Dor untuk Palestin. Saya nak mohon juga jadi tentera pembela. Pembelaan Pas tidak berbaloi dengan mengibarkan bendera Palestin di sawah padi dan tepi laut. Kadang berak lebih mudah dari berketut Tok Dor.Hushhhh. Trims.

buat aduan." Aku dengar macam, fuh, hebat gila Suffi ni siap bawak lawyer. Yang ikut aku 2 orang tu loya buruk ada la. Aku pun cerita la serba sedikit mengenai video tu. Aku tekankan itu bukan satu tuduhan (bahawa Suffi bertanggungjawab buat video PN jadi FYP di TikTok), cuma ianya satu pertanyaan. Yang buat konklusi Suffi terlibat tu bukan aku, tapi netizen. "Kami pun dah salin setiap patah perkataan yang En. Najib sebut dalam video tu. Bos saya pun sama. Kami sama-sama berpendapat tak ada isu jenayah pun dari pihak En. Najib. Boleh tak kalau saya panggil En. Suffi datang berjumpa En. Najib sekarang? Kita setel sini je la." "Saya ok je. Saya pun nak tau apa yang dia tak puas hati sangat dengan video tu. Bukan fitnah pun." Inspektor tu pun telefon Suffi. "En. Suffi, boleh datang balai sekarang? En Najib ada ni. Kita setel depan-depan lah ya?" Tapi Suffi bagitau, dia ada di luar kawasan. Inspektor tu pun mengomel. "Siang tadi En. Suffi setuju kalau nak datang balai jumpa En. Najib." Aku pun bukak la akaun FB si Suffi. Baru ja dia update pi makan malam dengan famili. Siap tag tempat makan tu. Luar kawasan apa, dekat ja pun. Hadoih! Lepas Suffi taknak datang, Inspektor tu pujuk aku untuk tetap buat permohonan maaf terbuka seperti yang diminta Suffi. "Setel macam tu la En. Najib, takyah panjang-panjang dah." "Aik. Takkan saya nak mintak maaf. Bukan saya buat salah pun. Saya tetap takkan mintak maaf." Ketegaq la jugak aku ni, dengan walaun, mana boleh bagi muka sangat. Inspektor tu pun telefon la Suffi sekali lagi. "En. Suffi, saya dengan bos saya berpendapat En. Najib tak ada keluarkan apa-apa kenyataan jenayah pun. Jadi kami tak boleh nak teruskan. Kalau En. Suffi nak proceed, kena melalui mahkamah, saman malu ke." Hampa nak tau apa Suffi cakap? Lebih kurang gini. "Peguam saya cakap, boleh lekat kes tu. Polis kena amik tindakan juga terhadap Najib tu." Respon Inspektor lepas tu memang kelakar. "Aik, kami pulak yang nak kena ikut cakap En. Suffi?" Bila dengar ja Inspektor cakap camtu, aku gelak macam haram. Aku rasa Suffi pun boleh dengar. Harey betoi Suffi ni. Sukati dia ja nak mengarah polis. Hang ingat hang sapa? Owh, cerita ni tak habis lagi. Ada sambungan pulak, di mana esoknya, aku pulak buat report balas terhadap Suffi. Bersambung.

Dia tidak akan ampunkan dosa si fulan!" Lalu Allah berfirman: "Siapakah yang bersumpah atas nama Aku bahawa Aku tidak akan ampunkan si fulan? Sesungguhnya Aku telah ampunkan si fulan dan Aku hapuskan pahala amalan kamu. " (Hadis sahih riwayat Imam Muslim) Justeru, berhati-hatilah bila memasuki ruang politik, jangan sampai terlajak masuk ke dalam daerah keTuhanan.

where the Nazi Germany targeted the Jews, Roma people and others, the UK pushed harder for the establishment of the Jewish State of Israel. Interestingly, the UN got into the picture and a UN Resolution(Resolution 181) was passed for the establishment of the Jewish State of Israel, an Arab Muslim State of Palestine and an independently governed Jerusalem. The United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine was a proposal by the United Nations , which recommended a partition of Mandatory Palestine at the end of the British Mandate . On 29 November 1947 , the UN General Assembly adopted the Plan as Resolution 181 (II) . [1] The resolution recommended the creation of independent Arab and Jewish States linked economically [2] and a Special International Regime for the city of Jerusalem and its surroundings. The Arab state was to have a territory of 11,100 square kilometres or 42%, the Jewish state a territory of 14,100 square kilometres or 56%, while the remaining 2%comprising the cities of Jerusalem, Bethlehem and the adjoning areawould become an international zone. [3] [4] On May 14, 1948 , David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day. Israel was admitted as a full U.N. member in 1949 . However, the Palestinian application that has been made over the decades have continuously been denied. The latest was on 18/4/2024. ' The Security Council today blocked Palestines bid to become a full member of theUnited Nations due to a United States veto on a draft resolution that would have recommended the granting of such status. The proposal, submitted by Algeria, received 12 votes in favour, with the United States casting a negative vote and Switzerland and the United Kingdom abstaining. A Council resolution requires at least nine votes in favour and no vetoes from its five permanent members China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States to pass .- UN Website 12 of the 15 members of the UN Security Council voted in favour - but with the draconian VETO, one of the 5 Countries that hold the VETO can deny the majority decision. Time for the VETO to be abolished. If one looks at the UN agreed division of the region, we find that many of the current maps is misleading - the size of Palestine has been shrinked, which is not right. See how Gaza has shrank - Palestine was supposed to be much larger - and if you look at the UN approved map - Gaza and West Bank are connected by land of its own. Malaysia must be clear and push for the withdrawal of Israel back to its borders as per the plan approved by the UN in the Plan as per Resolution 181. Do not be fooled by the plans being 'propagated' by some that has increased substantially the area of Israel and diminished the size of Palestine. INJUSTICE that followed UN Resolution 181 - was the creation of the Palestinian Refugee problem. When they created ISRAEL - there was massive 'cleaning up' of the native Arab or Muslim inhabitants from Israel. [ REMEMBER The people indigenous inhabitants of the region were never consulted before the UN decided to draw borders and create Israel and Palestine. It was thus sad that people staying in the area for generations found themselves being pressured to leave what became Israel simply because they were NOT JEWS.] In 1948 more than 700 000 Palestinian Arabs about half of Mandatory Palestine's Arab population fled from their homes or were expelled, at first by Zionist paramilitaries, [a] and after the establishment of the Israel, by its military. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] The expulsion and flight was a central component of the fracturing, dispossession, and displacement of Palestinian society, known as the Nakba. [10] [11] [12] Dozens of massacres targeting Arabs were conducted by Israeli military forces and between 400 and 600 Palestinian villages were destroyed. Village wells were poisoned in a biological warfare programme and properties were looted to prevent Palestinian refugees from returning. [13] [14] Other sites were subject to Hebraization of Palestinian place names. [15] The precise number of Palestinian refugees, many of whom settled in Palestinian refugee camps in neighboring states, is a matter of dispute. [16] Around 80 percent of the Arab inhabitants of what became Israel (half of the Arab total population of Mandatory Palestine) left or were expelled from their homes ETHNIC CLEANSING or 'GENOCIDE' would be what we call this today, and it was great injustice, and blame will lie not just on Israel, but certainly the UN. Did they not consider this problem - could they have insisted on no 'expulsion' of people from their homes. The Palestinian REFUGEE came into being, and only then since 1947 have the UN realized the problem created by the UN's own fault, when they created Israel and Palestine in a place where the community was multi-ethnic and multi-religious. {Something similar happened when India was divided into Muslim Pakistan and India). 1947: November 29: Resolution 181 : Recommending partition of the Mandatory Palestine into Arab and Jewish states, and international status for the City of Jerusalem . 1948: November 19: Resolution 212 : Assistance to Palestinian refugees December 11: Resolution 194 : establishes Conciliation Commission; protection of and free access to Jerusalem and other Holy Places; Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible 1949: December 8: Resolution 302(IV) : Assistance to Palestine refugees December 9: Resolution 303(IV) : International Regime for Jerusalem December 10: Resolution 356 : Jerusalem 1950: December 2: Resolution 393 : Assistance to Palestinian refugees December 14: Resolution 394 (V) : Calls for Arab-Israeli peace negotiations, and a solution for Palestinian refugees. December 14: Resolution 468 : Reduces financing for an international regime in Jerusalem. 1952: January 26: Resolution 512 : Report of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine. January 26: Resolution 513 : Assistance to Palestinian refugees. November 6: Resolution 614 : Assistance to Palestinian refugees. November 25: Resolution 660 : Report of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees ( UNRWA ). 1953: November 27: Resolution 720 : Assistance to Palestinian refugees. November 27: Resolution 766 : Accounts of UNRWA. 1954: December 4: Resolution 818 : Assistance to Palestinian refugees. December 4: Resolution 879 : Accounts of UNRWA. 1955: December 3: Resolution 916 : Assistance to Palestinian refugees. December 3: Resolution 964 : Accounts of UNRWA. 1956: December 21: Resolution 1081 : Accounts of UNRWA. 1957: February 27: Resolution 1091 : Palestinian refugees. February 28: Resolution 1018 : Palestinian refugees . December 12: Resolution 1191.html : Palestinian refugees. 1958: December 12: Resolution 1315 : Palestinian refugees. 1959: December 9: Resolution 1456 : UNRWA. 1960: December 18: Resolution 1545 : Accounts of UNRWA. 1961: April 21: Resolution 1604 : Palestinian refugees October 30: Resolution 1636 : Accounts of UNRWA. December 20: Resolution 1725 : Palestinian refugees 1962: December 11: Resolution 1789 : Accounts of UNRWA. December 20: Resolution 1856 : Palestinian refugees 1963 June 27: UN Special Assembly Resolution 1874. June 27: UN Special Assembly Resolution 1875. November 6: Resolution 1890-C : Accounts of UNRWA. December 3: Resolution 1912 : Palestinian refugees 1965: February 10: Resolution 2002 : Palestinian refugees December 13: Resolution 2047-C : Accounts of UNRWA. December 13: Resolution 2048-C : Accounts of UNRWA. December 15: Resolution 2052 : UNRWA Report. 1966: October 26: Resolution 2139-C : Accounts of UNRWA. November 17: Resolution 2154 : Palestinian refugees . 1967:...and the list goes on and on >>UN Resolutions on Palestine> Israel got its own country - but they have been expanding and expanding their borders to the detriment of the Palestine people. Did all the Palestinian Jews move to the new Israel - well, many continued to live where they were with their Muslim and Christian brethren. Now, the people of Israel are not all indigenous Jews, as many of the Jews in Israel are migrants from many other countries - including those in the Zionist Movement, and they have dominated the political power in Israel. Israel at present is OCCUPYING (or colonizing) a lot of Palestine - and their object seems 'expansion' of Israel - as such, pressure have been put on indigenous Palestinians to move out, as they build even new settlements for Israeli Jews in what we call Occupied Territory.. There has been those who are promoting the 1967 Borders of Israel, including the US > BUT really should we not be talking about the 1947 UN Resolution borders that decided on the Borders of Israel, Borders of Palestine, and the Borders of the Independent Jerusalem. Malaysia must be strong about the 1947 Borders as per the partition plan of the UN. I do not believe that any UN Resolution has acknowledged that Israel's Borders have expanded. Whilst Israel had been made a UN member State since 1949 - but the Palestine has to date been denied UN Membership.. On 11 May 1949, the General Assembly by the requisite two-thirds majority approved the application to admit Israel to the UN by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 273. The vote in the General Assembly was 37 to 12, with 9 abstentions. UN Membership acknowledged the State of Palestine and this is important. But again, the passing of the UN Security Council on 18/4/2024 was blocked by the United States of America(a permanent member with VETO power). It must be noted that 12 of the 15 members of the UN Security Council voted in favour. If the UN Security Council had passed the Resolution, the the question of Palestine recognition as a UN Member State will be taken to the General Assembly, where a two third majority vote is required. 1947 Borders is valid as all neighboring countries like Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon had already achieved their independence before the UN Partition Plan and Resolution 29/11/1947. Hence the then borders of Israel, Palestine and Jerusalem is valid - and rightly, we have to revert to the borders as in 1947. All areas of Palestine that are occupied by Israel and any other country are nothing but 'occupied territories' and must be returned to Palestine. Lebanon formally achieved its independence from League of Nations (LON) mandate under French administration on November 22, 1943 . Egypt formally achieved its independence from Great Britain on March 15, 1922 . Transjordan formally achieved its independence from Britain on March 22, 1946 , and the Kingdom of Transjordan was proclaimed on May 25, 1946. Syria became independent on 17 April 1946 . Israel's expansion of its geographic territory beyond what was provided for in the November 1947 partition plan are all ILLEGAL and ought to belong to Palestine. ISRAEL must return to the 1947 Borders. US vetoes bid to make Palestine a full UN member By AUGUSTA SARAIVA World Friday, 19 Apr 2024 12:21 PM MYT NEW YORK (Bloomberg): The United States has vetoed a bid to make Palestine a full-fledged member of the United Nations, rebuffing a Palestinian push to gain broader international recognition. Twelve of 15 Security Council members voted in favour of the proposal on Thursday (April 18), while the United Kingdom and Switzerland abstained. Although the Palestinian authority received enough support to have its bid referred to the General Assembly for confirmation, the negative vote from the United States, which wields veto power, was enough to block it. Arab nations revived the proposal for full membership, which was originally turned down in 2011, in an effort to maintain momentum for the Palestinian cause as the civilian death toll in the war between Israel and Iran-backed Hamas in the Gaza Strip continues to climb. Foreign ministers from countries including Iran, Jordan and Algeria travelled to New York to attend a debate on the Middle East that preceded the vote. The best path toward Palestinian statehood "is through direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority," Deputy US Ambassador Robert Wood said after the vote. United States allies including France, Japan and South Korea were among those voting for full Palestinian membership. The US veto, which was telegraphed in advance, comes as an olive branch to Israel at the United Nations after Washington refused to veto a Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, sparking friction between the allies. Since then, the United States has grown more critical of Israel's approach to the war while continuing to support it on the battlefield. Even as the US veto reaffirms the close relationship between the two allies, it's also likely to further isolate them at the United Nations. For the fourth time since the war started, the United States will have to justify its veto before the 193-member General Assembly which is much more vocal on the rights of Palestinians, and critical of Israel's policies, than it was in 2011. The General Assembly, which is more representative but less powerful than the Security Council, voted overwhelmingly in favour of a cease-fire in Gaza months ago. Since 2 , Palestine has had observer-state status at the United Nations. 'Every Vote' Israel's Ambassador Gilad Erdan said that recognising a Palestinian state would make future negotiations all but impossible. "As long as the Palestinians feel that they can exploit this politicised body to their benefit, why would they bother at the negotiating table or support any compromise?" he said. But Ziad Abu Amr, special representative of the Palestinian Authority's president, said, "To those who say that recognising the Palestinian state must happen through negotiations, and not through a UN resolution, we wonder once again: How was the state of Israel established?" While the US veto was widely expected, Palestinians also looked at the vote as a barometer to assess international support for their cause. "The states supporting our membership are taking an important stance that must be acknowledged and appreciated," Deputy Palestinian Ambassador Majed Bamya said ahead of the Security Council action. Looking ahead, France is working on a Security Council resolution on the Israel-Palestinian conflict that could pave the way for the recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations, noting that a majority of member states already recognise it as a country. Nations including Spain and Slovenia have also indicated they're preparing to recognise a Palestinian state. "We cannot wait any longer," Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares told the Security Council Thursday. "This is a question of justice for Palestine, it constitutes the best guarantee of security for Israel and it is the first and most fundamental condition for the future of peace in the region." Bloomberg - Star, 19/4/2024 Security Council Fails to Recommend Full United Nations Membership for State of Palestine, Owing to Veto Cast by United States The Security Council today blocked Palestines bid to become a full member of theUnited Nations due to a United States veto on a draft resolution that would have recommended the granting of such status. The proposal, submitted by Algeria, received 12 votes in favour, with the United States casting a negative vote and Switzerland and the United Kingdom abstaining. A Council resolution requires at least nine votes in favour and no vetoes from its five permanent members China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States to pass. The Algerian draft failed, owing to a negative vote cast by a permanent member. If adopted, the draft would have had the 15-member Council recommend to the 193-member General Assembly that the State of Palestine be admitted to membership in the United Nations. In 2011, Palestine submitted an application to become a full UN Member State. Although that aspiration did not materialize, it obtained the status of a non-member observer State in November2 through an Assembly vote of 138 in favour to nine against (Canada, Czech Republic, Federated States of Micronesia, Israel, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Panama, Palau, United States), with 41 abstentions. An application for admission to UN membership must be approved by the Council before being forwarded to the Assembly, where the matter requires at least two-thirds support to pass. Introduction of Draft Resolution Introducing the draft resolution, the representative of Algeria said that he is doing so on behalf of his Government, the Arab Group, the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation, the Non-Aligned Movement, and countless peace-loving countries, urging Council members to vote for the text and the sake of Palestinians. It is the least we could do to honour the debts we owe to its people, he said.Palestine fulfils membership criteria as defined in the UN Charter. It is time for Palestine to take its rightful place among the community of nations, he declared, adding: Peace will come from Palestines inclusion, not from its exclusion. Failing to do so is a denial of the Councils responsibilities, an unforgivable mistake, and a license to continue injustice and impunity. Explanation of Votes Speaking after the vote, the representative of the Russian Federation , spotlighted the simple question before the Council today:Are the Palestinians worth being part of the global family? While most of the international community has consistently answered in the affirmative, the United States believes differently, he noted namely, that the Palestinians do not deserve to have their own State. For that reason, Washington, D.C., is ready to turn a blind eye to Israels crimes against civilians in Gaza, force them to submit to the occupying Power, transform them into servants and second-class persons and, perhaps, oust them from their territory once and for all. The United States veto today is a hopeless attempt to stop the inevitable course of history, he stressed, adding that the results of the vote speak for themselves. He therefore called on the United States to listen to the voice of reason, consider the consequences of its decision and join other Council members efforts to establish an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The representative of the United States expressed support for Palestinian Statehood within a comprehensive peace agreement. A sustainable peace can only be achieved via a two-State solution with Israels security guaranteed. His country has long been clear that premature actions at the UN, even with the best intentions, will not achieve Statehood for the Palestinian people. The United States voted against the draft because there was no unanimity among the Admissions Committee members on whether the applicant met the membership criteria outlined in ArticleIV of the UN Charter. He said the United States has long called on the applicant to undertake reforms to help establish the attributes for readiness for Statehood. He underscored that this vote does not reflect opposition to Palestinian Statehood but is an acknowledgment that it will only come from direct negotiations between the parties. The representative of France said the time has come to achieve a comprehensive political settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on a two-State solution. France supported the draft as Palestines admission as a full UN member could facilitate the implementation of such as solution and strengthen the Palestinian Authority. The representative of Guyana said that 13 years after the last request, another call for justice by the Palestinian people was made today. However, the Councils response was not enough to deliver that justice, she said, noting that, since 1947, there have been at least 792 formal Council meetings on the Palestinian question. While the Council has largely been sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, this sympathy has not generated enough political will to achieve a comprehensive, just and lasting solution. If the occupying Power were held to account for its continued violation of international law, the path to a free and independent Palestine would have been cleared a long time ago, she said. The representative of Slovenia said that his delegation supported the draft and Palestines membership in the United Nations. The two-State solution, under which two democratic States Israel and Palestine live side by side in peace is the only long-term sustainable option. Membership in the UN is not an alternative to negotiations, but complementary to them.The UN should play a crucial role in the peace process, and therefore both States should have an equal status at the UN, he said. The representative of the Republic of Korea recalled that, although his country first applied for UN membership in 1949, it was not granted that status until 1991. As such, he emphasized that his country can clearly attest to the meaning of aspirations to be admitted to this paramount international organization.His delegation voted in favour of the draft resolution because renewed efforts are needed to revitalize a path to the two-State solution, he said, adding that its vote today does not constitute bilateral recognition of Palestine as a State. This matter will be considered in the future at a time conducive to the resolution of the conflict. The representative of the United Kingdom said her country is committed to a two-State solution. Recognition of a Palestinian State should not be at the start of the process, but it does not need to be at the very end of it, she said. She called for the crisis in Gaza to be fixed first, noting that Gaza must be part of a future Palestinian State. But Hamas is still in control of parts of it and Israeli hostages remain in captivity, she underlined, stating that this shows the process is still at the start. Ensuring Hamas is no longer in charge of Gaza and removing its capacity to attack Israel are unavoidable steps on the road to peace, as is supporting Palestinian Government reforms. Her country abstained because a focus must be kept on getting aid in and getting hostages out, then making progress to a sustainable ceasefire without a return to fighting. The representative of Japan expressed regret that, despite the adoption of a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, this objective has not been attained, and the humanitarian situation continues to deteriorate. Japan has strongly upheld the Palestinian right to self-determination, and consistently supported a two-State solution, he said, recalling that his country voted in favor of the 2 General Assembly resolution granting Palestine observer State status at the United Nations. Similarly, Japan voted in favor of todays draft resolution as a comprehensive decision, recognizing that Palestine meets the criteria for admission to the UN membership. The representative of Switzerland , whose delegation abstained, noted that it would be preferable to determine Palestinians membership at the UN at a future stage once there has been peace. Voicing concern over the catastrophic situation in the Middle East, she underscored the need to ensure the implementation of the Councils resolution and a ceasefire without further ado to restore political solutions to the conflict. The representative of China said that today is a sad day.Because of the veto by the United States, the application of Palestine for its full membership at the UN has been rejected. It is unacceptable that some countries are challenging Palestines eligibility for membership. Some countries make direct negotiations between Palestine and Israel a prerequisite, claiming that Palestines membership in the UN can only be the result of negotiations. This is putting the cart before the horse, he asserted. The representative of Ecuador recalled that his country recognized Palestine as a free, independent State on 24December2010. In 2 , it co-sponsored the General Assembly resolution considering observer status for the State of Palestine and, since 2014, it has maintained an embassy in Ramallah while Palestine has one in Quito. Today, once again, Ecuadors vote has shown our commitment to the Palestinian people, reaffirming our recognition that we made 14 years ago, he emphasized. He also expressed hope that, in the very near future, conditions will exist such that the Council will unanimously allow Palestine to become a full member of the United Nations. The representative of Mozambique underscored that people are born with the inherent right to self-determination, independence and sovereignty, as anchored in the Charter. He reminded the Council that, as of today, 140 UN Member States have recognized Palestine. This quasi-universal recognition is a testament that Palestine fulfils the requirement of Statehood, including population, territory, government and the capacity to engage in relations with other States, he said. Conditions are ripe for Palestine to be a full member of the UN. Palestine is clearly a peace-loving nation and has shown the willingness to carry out the obligations of the Charter, he added. The representative of Sierra Leone noted that 13 years after Palestines application was first considered by the Security Council Admissions Committee, there is a recognition of the basis for such a request. Highlighting General Assembly resolution 181 (1947), which recommends the establishment of an independent Arab and an independent Jewish State, he said his country voted in favour of the draft resolution that would have strengthened the two-State solution. While the membership of the State of Palestine may have been delayed, it cannot be denied, he concluded. The representative of Algeria expressed gratitude to all those who voted in favour. The overwhelming support sends a crystal clear message the State of Palestine deserves its rightful place among the UN Members, he said, adding: We will return stronger vocal and backed by the overwhelming majority of the General Assembly. He pledged that Algerias effort will not cease until the State of Palestine becomes a full member of the UN. The representative of Malta , Council President for April, said that her country made a clear choice by supporting a two-State solution and in favour of an idea that has enjoyed the support of the vast majority of the international community for decades. UN membership is a necessary step for the Palestinians to achieve equal footing with the rest of the international community, she asserted. The Permanent Observer for the State of Palestine underscored: Our right to self-determination has never once been subject to bargaining or negotiation. It is inalienable and eternal, and not subject to manipulation, domination or conditions. Especially not by Israel the occupying Power, the ethnic-cleansing Power, the colonial Power, he stressed, despite its determination to evict Palestinians from their homeland, eliminate their identity, uproot their civilization and besiege their future. Underscoring that we will not disappear, he said that Palestinians remain on their land out of patience, steadfastness, hope and sacrifice despite oppression, exile, enslavement, persecution, displacement and eviction. Stating that his delegation came to the Council today to salvage what can be saved, he noted that most Council members stood on the side of justice, freedom and hope in line with the legal and ethical principles that must govern our world. He also thanked all those who supported Palestines request for UN membership for understanding Palestinians pain at this moment. Emphasizing that Palestine accepted the two-State solution as an international vision of peace and engaged in the peace process, he said that Palestinian leadership continues to be committed to this peaceful track. He questioned, however, if Israel is a true partner for peace, stressing that it insists on occupation, murder and siege to snuff out any hope of a sovereign Palestinian State. Asking those present if they will give Israel the time it needs to annex Palestinian land, the immunity it needs to evict and kill and the right to veto Palestines full UN membership, he underscored that such inclusion is not symbolic. Rather, it is a manifestation of Palestinians right to self-determination and an investment in peace, he urged, adding: We dont want to replace anyone, we want to enter your club as an equal. Also stating that Palestinians know best what a just solution is a free Palestine he reiterated: We will not disappear. The representative of Israel thanked the United States, in particular President Joseph Biden, for standing up for truth and morality in the face of hypocrisy and politics. Calling the draft resolution destructive, he said the Palestinian Authority does not meet the basic criteria, has no authority over its territory and supports terror. He questioned how Palestinians can be called peace-loving when they are paying terrorists to slaughter Israelis. None of their leaders condemns terrorism or the 7October massacre. They call Hamas their brothers, he added, and they do not recognize Israels right to exist as a Jewish State. He noted that the Palestinian representative at the meeting does not represent Hamas, and in turn does not represent at least half of the Palestinian people. Most of you decided to reward Palestinian terror with [a] Palestinian State, he said, saying these votes will embolden Palestinian rejectionism and make peace almost impossible. Despite the evidence he has brought to the Council, speaking to it is like speaking to a brick wall, he said, adding: I pray that the day will come when you will understand the magnitude of the mistake you are making here. I pray that you will understand before it is too late. - UN Website, 18/4/2024

takda orang beli Terus je beli, balik2 buka mmg banyak bubuk dan banyak sgt sisa daun dan batang jerami dlm plastik ni. Nasib baik untuk angsa.

Merdeka kita bercakap pasal food security, setiap tahun Negara kita terpaksa import beras dari luar Negara untuk mencukupkan bekalan beras. Berbillion duit Kerajaan keluar untuk import, subsidi baja, racun, benih, input pertanian, jentera, infra dll. Sekali kita buat penanaman padi tanpa racun dan baja kimia, 100% secara alami, hasil cantik dan tiada serangga perosak. Buah padat, penuh tangkai dan tiada serangan penyakit. Alhamdulillah. Inilah masanya Kerajaan Malaysia Madani nak ketengahkan makanan sihat untuk rakyat Malaysia. Doakan usaha ini berjaya dan cita cita arwah TGNA dulu berjaya. Amen Nota: gambar tanah merekah dan tanaman padi kering tu, bendang sebelah yang ikut sistem taliair sedia ada.

BERAS GANU Tiada Di Pasaran 1. BERAS GANU ialah Beras MyGAP, beras berkualiti tinggi yang disahkan selamat secara saintifik terutama dari segi kualiti dan kandungan racun. Terengganu adalah negeri yang mempunyai pesawah memiliki persijilan MyGAP paling ramai di Malaysia. Persijilan ini dibawah Kementerian Pertanian. 2. Sawah MyGAP sudah ada di Terengganu sebelum ini. Tapi Beras MyGAP tak ada kerana Padi MyGAP tak diuruskan rantaian pengeluarannya sehingga menghasilkan Beras MyGAP sebagai produk akhir. Bila tiba musim menuai, padi MyGAP dicampur dengan padi lain dan dikilangkan sekali dengan padi bukan MyGAP. Akhirnya semua jadi sama. Sayang sekali bila ada Padi MyGAP tapi tak ada beras yang layak dipersijilkan dengan persijilan kualiti ini. Ringkasnya, Persijilan MyGAP di bawah KPKM ini tidak dilengkapkan sepenuhnya lalu Kerajaan Negeri berusaha melengkapkannya. 3. Antara puncanya ialah kerana harga Padi MyGAP sama saja dengan padi biasa. Kerajaan tak ada hak untuk nak arahkan pesawah MyGAP supaya hantar padi MyGAP ke kilang tertentu untuk diproses secara berpusat agar tidak bercampur dengan padi bukan MyGAP. Di Besut jelapang padi utama Terengganu ada 4 buah kilang padi. Brokar padi ada kilang pilihan mereka sendiri untuk dihantar padi. Biasanya kilang yang kadar potongannya lebih rendah akan jadi pilihan. Harga padi dan subsidi sama sahaja. 4. Untuk itu, Kerajaan Negeri telah menubuhkan Jawatankuasa Beras MyGAP dipengerusikan Pengarah Pertanian Negeri. Antara Jabatan dan Agensi terlibat ialah UPEN Terengganu, Jabatan Pertanian, IADA KETARA dan TADC. 5. Jawatankuasa telah melantik Kilang Padi Konsortium Lembaga Pertubuhan Peladang di Baruh Masin Jabi untuk memproses padi MyGAP menjadi Beras MyGAP. Kerajaan Negeri mengeluarkan peruntukan RM200 ribu semusim untuk bayar insentif tambahan bernilai RM105/tan padi kasar bagi pesawah MyGAP yang bersedia hantar padi mereka ke Kilang LPP agar proses padi MyGAP ini diuruskan secara berpusat sehingga tak bercampur dengan padi bukan MyGAP. Lebih kurang 80% dari jumlah pesawah yang ada sijil MyGAP setuju menyertai program ini. 6. Dengan erti kata lain, Kerajaan Negeri telah bantu bayar subsidi tambahan kepada Padi MyGAP sehingga Beras MyGAP yang berkualiti tinggi dan selamat dimakan akhirnya dapat dihasilkan dan dijual dengan harga seperti beras biasa walaupun kualitinya berbeza. 7. Program Beras MyGAP Kerajaan Negeri ini juga telah membantu survival Kilang Padi Konsortium LPP milik Persekutuan dalam persaingan untuk mendapatkan bekalan padi. Dengan adanya 4 buah kilang padi di Besut, persaingan untuk mendapatkan bekalan padi sebenarnya agak tinggi. Tambahan pula kilang milik swasta menawarkan kadar potongan yang lebih rendah. Dengan adanya program MyGAP ini, sekitar 500 ha padi MyGAP kita telah bantu untuk dihantar ke Kilang Konsortiun LPP. Pesawah yang hantar padi ke kilang lain tak akan dapat insentif Kerajaan Negeri RM105/tan padi kerana padi mereka tidak berjaya menghasilkan beras MyGAP. 8. Selama kira-kita 3 musim Program Beras MyGAP dengan jenama BERAS GANU berjalan lancar sehinggalah Kerajaan PN bertukar kepada Kerajaan Madani. 9. Selepas peralihan tampuk kepimpinan di Kementerian Pertanian, beberapa kenyataan bernada memperlekehkan usaha Kerajaan Negeri Terengganu dalam menghasilkan jenama BERAS GANU telah dikeluarkan oleh Pejabat Menteri Pertanian dan Keterjaminan Makanan. Kita memahami dari nada kenyataan tersebut bahawa KPKM tidak gembira dengan sedikit kejayaan Terengganu. Usaha Kerajaan Terengganu bukan hanya tak disokong malah diperlekehkan. 10. Kemuncaknya ialah, berlaku sabotaj dari Kilang Padi Konsortium LPP apabila Beras MyGAP yang sepatutnya dibekalkan kepada TADC untuk dibungkuskan dengan jenama BERAS GANU telah dijual kepada pihak lain. Hanya 30% sahaja dijual kepada TADC. Dari jumlah padi MyGAP musim 2023 yang telah dibayar insentif oleh Kerajaan Negeri Terengganu, Kilang Konsortium hanya membekalkan 120 metrik tan beras sahaja kepada TADC dari jumlah keseluruhan 840 metrik tan yang sepatutnya dibekalkan. Bakinya telah dijual kepada pihak lain tanpa dimaklumkan kepada Kerajaan Negeri. Untuk makluman, bekalan Beras MyGAP kepada TADC dibayar dengan harga sama sebagaimana kilang jual kepada syarikat lain. 11. Kita yakin sabotaj ini bukan keputusan Kilang Konsortium LPP secara bersendirian. Sedia difahami retetan senario sebelum berlaku sabotaj. Ia suatu agenda dari pihak yang lebih atas. 12. Panas sampai ke petang yang diharapkan rupanya hujan disiang hari. Kerjasama dengan Kilang Konsortium LPP tak mampu diteruskan lagi. Kerajaan Negeri telah mengemukakan tuntutan untuk mendapatkan ganti Beras MyGAP dari padi yang telah dibayar insentif oleh Kerajaan Negeri. Ini adalah hak kita. 13. TADC sebagai GLC Negeri yang melaksanakan Program BERAS GANU belum ada kilang padi. Kita hanya ada kilang pembungkusan beras buat masa ini. Di kilang inilah beras MyGAP dibungkus dan seterusnya diedarkan. Way forward kita ialah untuk TADC memiliki kilang padi sendiri. 14. Pelajaran mahal yang kita pelajari dari peristiwa ini ialah, dalam rantaian pengeluaran, kita tak boleh bergantung kepada pihak lain yang tidak berniat baik terhadap kita. Kita mesti mampu berdikari dan menyediakan semua keperluan dalam rantaian pengeluaran sendiri. 15. Doakan agar BERAS GANU akan kembali semula ke pasaran dalam tempoh masa terdekat insya-Allah. Jenama BERAS GANU tak mati cuma kita perlu buat penstrukturan semula berdasarkan situasi semasa. Dr Azman Ibrahim

Presiden MIC (Vigneswaran) menghubungi saya samalam. "Dia akan pergi (Kuala Kubu Bharu) esok... Isnin. You dengar daripada siapa? katanya. ... Perdana Menteri berkata kerajaan tidak akan mempersoalkan kuasa Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan raja-raja Melayu dalam sesuatu isu termasuk permohonan Najib Razak agar dia dibenarkan menjalani hukuman di rumah. Menurut Anwar Ibrahim isu tersebut menyentuh peranan dua pihak iaitu Lembaga Pengampunan Wilayah Persekutuan, serta Agong sendiri. Dia juga menafikan afidavit Ahmad Zahid itu itu melibatkan sebarang cubaan kerajaan untuk mengurangkan keputusan yang sudah ditetapkan oleh mahkamah ke atas bekas perdana menteri terbabit. "Itu bukan soalnya. Pendirian kita (kerajaan) adalah tuntas, bahawa keputusan dibuat dalam mesyuarat lembaga pengampunan, keputusan muktamad. "Agong (terlibat) dalam mesyuarat lembaga pengampunan. "Sejak merdeka hingga sekarang belum ada tindakan kerajaan yang menyinggung peranan dan kuasa raja-raja Melayu, dan itu kita kena pertahankan," katanya ketika berucap pada konvensyen khas PKR sempena sambutan 25 tahun parti itu di Shah Alam, hari ini.

memahami keperluan Sabah dan kepentingan rakyatnya. "Dengan pengumuman ini, kita (kerajaan Sabah) amat senang hati kerana ini akan memudahkan pesakit jantung di Sabah, tidak lagi perlu dihantar ke Kuala Lumpur tetapi (rawatan) hanya boleh dilakukan di Kota Kinabalu. "Inilah yang kita mahukan kerana aspek kesihatan cukup penting. Bukan sahaja kesihatan, tetapi juga pendidikan dan sebagainya. "Kerajaan Persekutuan amat memahami dan ini amat kita hargai," katanya dipetik. Perdana Menteri ketika berucap pada Majlis Sambutan Aidilfitri MADANI 2024 Peringkat Kebangsaan berkata Pusat Jantung Negara di Sabah itu bakal menjadi pusat rawatan jantung kedua terbesar negara selepas Institut Jantung Negara di Kuala Lumpur. Penubuhan pusat itu berikutan kapasiti perkhidmatan kardiologi di Sabah yang terbatas sehingga menyebabkan ramai terpaksa mendapatkan rawatan di luar khususnya di Kuala Lumpur.

kita tampung. Ini adalah dasar bertanggungjawab dan inilah reformasi," katanya pada ucapan di Konvensyen 25 Tahun KEADILAN di Pusat Konvensyen Shah Alam (IDCC) Shah Alam pada Ahad. Sementara itu Anwar yang juga Menteri Kewangan memberi jaminan bahawa rakyat yang terkesan dengan penyasaran subsidi akan dibantu menerusi pemberian tunai bulanan yang kali pertama ditawarkan kepada rakyat berbanding subsidi pukal sebelum ini. "Kalau (harga minyak) naik, kita bagi suntikan langsung kepada rakyat. (Subsidi digunakan) naik RM100 sebulan, kita bagi RM100, ada masalah ke? nak bantah sebab apa? "Ini kaedah (pemberian tunai) kita fikir punya lama, puluh tahun dibincang, puluh tahun juga kerajaan (terdahulu) setuju, tapi tak berani dilaksanakan sebab dia takut tak popular," katanya dipetik. Menurut Anwar lagi polisi subsidi bersasar sangat diperlukan bagi mengelakkan penyeludupan diesel di sempadan negara kerana harga bahan api itu lebih mahal di negara jiran. Juga sekitar 4 juta pendatang asing mendapat nikmat membeli petrol RON95 bersubsidi. Untuk rekod, pada 2023 kerajaan membelanjakan kira kira RM10 bilion bagi subsidi diesel. Dengan pelaksanaan dasar subsidi bersasar dijangka 50% penjimatan boleh didapatkan dan dana berkenaan diguna untuk tujuan meningkatkan kemudahan sosial lainnya.

habis-habis. Titah tambahan atau addendum berhubung pengampunan terhadap Najib dijadikan modal untuk menggugat kerajaan Madani dan Anwar. Iya menambahkan kegembiraan pihak membenci Anwar apabila adendum itu diikrarkan (dijadikan afidivit) oleh Zahid Hamidi menyokong semakan kehakiman oleh Najib Razak. Sokongan Zahid Hamidi itu sedikit mencelarukan keadaan memandangkan beliau berada dalam kerajaan, sikapnya itu seperti memijak ekor sendiri. Sebenarnya apa dilakukan Zahid itu tidak perlu diragui jika kita mengetahui sejarah politiknya. Maaf saya cukup faham hipokrasi politik Zahid. Adalah naif kalau Zahid tidak faham akan implikasi perbuatan itu. Beliau kini ditekan dari dalam Umno kononnya tidak berbuat apa-apa untuk proses pengampunan dan membebaskan Najib. Para penyodok punggung Najib malam siang menghentam Zahid menuduh Zahid sudah jadi kacang lupakan kulit terhadap Najib. Ikrar afidivit atau menjadi saksi "kritikal" itu adalah bukti yang beliau membela bosnya itu. Jadi apa dilakukan Zahid itu tanpa mengira implikasinya untuk membuktikan bahawa dia masih setia dan berusaha untuk membebaskan Najib. Najib memfailkan permohonan di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur pada 1 April lalu bagi mendapatkan semakan kehakiman mencabar kewujudan Titah Adendum atau titah tambahan yang dipertuan Agong ke-16 berhubung pengampunan untuknya. Apa menjadi masalah adendum berkenaan sebelum ini tidak berbangkit. Najib terus memperjuangkan kebebasan mutlak. Dalam titah tambahan itu memberi pengampunan supaya bekas PM itu menjalani pemenjaraan selama enam tahun di rumah. Sebelum ini pengampunan sudah diberikan kepada Najib dengan memotong tempoh pemenjaraan 12 tahun kepada enam tahun dan denda daripada RM120 juta kepada RM50 juta. Zahid membuat afidivit itu, mengakui mengetahui akan titah tambahan itu apabila beliau dimaklumkan oleh Menteri Pelaburan Perdagangan dan Industri Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz ketika mereka bertemu di rumah Zahid di Country Height pada 30 Januari. Ekoran penemuan titah tambahan itu yang kemudian dijadikan afidivit bagi menyokong semakan kehakiman Najib ia menimbulkan polemik sehingga ada yang beranggapan ada sesuatu yang tidak kena berlaku dalam kerajaan sehingga ada yang menyangka ada keretakan dalam kerajaan. Ada yang menuduh anggota kabinet berbohong mengenai pengampunan terhadap Najib dengan menyembunyikan titah tambahan itu, dan "sepoi"nya ada cuba mengaitkan wujud campur tangan perdana menteri sama. Antara individu terpalit dengan tuduhan, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail selaku menteri Dalam Negeri (KDN) dituduh sebagai bertanggungjawab mengenai hal itu dengan tidak berterus terang. Apabila Saifuddin diserang, ertinya serangan itu tertuju kepada PM. Ironisnya, addendum itu menjadi perkara yang turut disinggung oleh seorang ahli Parlimen Kerajaan, Hassan Karim (Pasir Gudang) yang mempersoalkan tindakan Zahid membuat afidivit yang menyokong semakan kehakiman Najib itu sebagai mencabar kerajaan. Hassan dalam mempersoalkan tindakan Zahid itu membawa balik kisah Musa Hitam dengan Dr Mahathir Mohamad sebelum ini, dimana Musa mengundur diri dari kabinet kerana tidak sehaluan dengan Mahathir. Ahli Parlimen Pasir Gudang memberi signal kepada Zahid dengan mencadangkan Zahid berbuat hal sama dengan Musa terhadap Mahathir, berundur dari kabinet. Sedikit sebanyak isu addendum ini menganggu minda Anwar Ibrahim. Semasa berucap di konvensyen Keadilan sempena 25 tahun parti itu hari ini, beliau menjelaskan tentang perkara itu dengan menegaskan kerajaan tidak akan mempersoalkan kuasa Yang diPertuan Agong dan Raja-raja Melayu dalam sesuatu isu termasuk permohonan Najib Razak agar dia dibenarkan menjalani hukuman di rumah. Menurut Anwar yang juga presiden Keadilan, isu itu menyentuh peranan dua pihak iaitu Lembaga Pengampunan Wilayah Persekutuan, serta Agong sendiri. Maksudnya dua pihak itu bertanggungjawab dan beliau tidak terbabit. Dalam pada itu beliau juga menafikan Afidavit Zahid itu melibatkan sebarang cubaan kerajaan untuk mengurangkan keputusan yang sudah ditetapkan oleh mahkamah ke atas Najib. "Pendirian kita (kerajaan) adalah tuntas, bahawa keputusan dibuat dalam mesyuarat lembaga pengampunan, keputusan muktamad," ujarnya di hadapan lebih 5,000 peserta dan pemerhati konvensyen di IDCC Shah Alam. Anwar juga memberi tahu sejak merdeka hingga sekarang belum ada tindakan kerajaan yang menyinggung peranan dan kuasa Raja-raja Melayu, dan itu kita kena pertahankan. Mengenai perkara semakan kehakiman oleh Najib ini saya ingin menyimpul begini, bahawa isu ini tidak terlibat dengan perdana menteri atau kerajaan secara langsung. Pihak kerajaan mematuhi dan menerima apa yang diputuskan oleh Lembaga Pengampunan manakala hak menyemak itu adalah hak mutlak Najib. Kedua, isu berkenaan adalah isu peribadi Najib Razak dan Zahid Hamidi sebagai bekas presiden Umno dengan presiden Umno yang berkebetulan kedua mereka adalah mempunyai hubungan sahabat. Apabila Zahid mencatatkan nama jawatannya dalam Afidavitnya selaku Timbalan Perdana Menteri, ia tidak boleh dikaitkan Afidavit itu sebagai suara kerajaan. Mereka yang menganggap tindakan Zahid itu sebagai melawan atau mencabar keputusan kerajaan adalah silap dan kurang mencermati serta memahami chemistry politik di antara bekas perdana menteri dengan timbalan perdana menteri serta juga cetek tentang seni politik demokrasi ala Malaysia. Dan tidak dinafikan isu Najib ini memberi sedikit tekanan jiwa baik kepada Zahid dan juga Anwar Ibrahim namun jauh sekali kalau meretakkan kerajaan Madani. [wm.kl. 6:50 pm 21/04/2024]

Yang manja dan sensitif pula akan marah-marah dan kecewa dengan perdana menteri kerana kelemahan itu. Maka itu di sinilah peranan dan tugas para pembantunya menyempurna dan meringankan tanggungjawab selaku PM, khasnya dari konteks keinsanan, para pembantulah yang menjadi galang ganti. Mereka itu seperti pegawai khas, pegawai peribadi, setiausaha politik dan orang-orang diberi kepercayaan secara "private"oleh Perdana Menteri. Peranan mereka penting menyempurnakan tugas kemasyarakatan seorang perdana menteri. Farhan bersama Jalil Hamid. Peranan dan tanggungjawab para pembantu ini penting kerana ditangan merekalah menentukan jaya atau tidak Anwar sebagai perdana menteri. Kehematan dan populariti yang sedia ada kepada PM ke 10 itu terletak kepada mereka. Merekalah menjadi simbol kepimpinan Perdana Menteri ke-10 itu. Jika mereka cuai atau gagal menjalankan tugas, maka yang menerima musibahnya ialah perdana menteri. Justeru para pembantu Anwar seharusnya lebih waspada dan mempunyai kehematan yang tinggi dalam memikul amanah sebagai pegawai atau pembantu perdana menteri. Farhan kunjung seniwati Sarimah. Mengenai hal ini, setakat ini syukur, kita lihat para pegawai atau individu yang menjadi pembantu Perdana Menteri melaksanakan tugas dan tanggungjawab masing masing dengan baik dan memuaskan. Masing-masing telah melakukan sedaya mungkin untuk menangani mana mana kumpulan dan individu yang tercicir atau tidak sempat ditangani Perdana Menteri. Atas inisiatif mereka, menyebabkan matlamat atau prinsip kerajaan Madani, mempedulikan rakyat tercapai. Bagaimana pun, bak kata pepatah mana ada gading tidak retak, ada juga para pegawai yang terus dipersoalkan kerana kelemahan tertentu. Salah seorang pembantu perdana menteri yang dilihat sangat berkesan melaksanakan tugas hakikinya ialah Setiausaha Politiknya sdr Farhan Fauzi. Tampak Farhan berjaya memainkan peranannya meringan tugas dan tanggungjawab Anwar sebagai perdana menteri dan berjaya meletakkan PM mencapai matlamatnya untuk memberi perkhidmatan kesemua golongan. Kepercayaan diberikan oleh PM kepadanya juga menyakinkan. Demi untuk memastikan tiada mana-mana pihak atau individu terlepas daripada menerima kerahmahan kerajaan Madani, Farhan telah menunjukkan kerja buatnya dengan baik. Semua orang senang dan seronok melihat tugas dan peranan dimainkan oleh anak muda ini. Tidak salah kalau saya kreditkan Farhan adalah Setiausaha Politik yang senang untuk berurusan. Misalnya lepas satu, satu artis antara Sarumah, Jalil Hamid, Shekal dan lain-lain yang keuzuran ataupun sudah tidak aktif mengalami keuzuran didatangni Farhan bertanya khabar dan membawa salam perdana menteri. Adakalanya keprihatinan Farhan kepada insan ini mengatasi kepedulian seorang wakil rakyat. Kunjungan Farhan di luar waktu pilihan raya juga sangat bererti, bahawa menunjukkan ke perihatinan kerajaan Madani kepada rakyat tanpa menyempadani masa. Kunjungan diluar waktu edah pilihan raya menggambarkan apa yang dilakukan itu penuh keikhlasan dan tidak bermotif politik. Farhan dan Nadil al Nuri dan rakan. Terbaru suatu tugas besar ditangani Farhan ialah mempersatukan semula seorang aktivis masyarakat Muhammad Nadir Al Nuri. Kisah bagaimana Nadirl al Nuri ini dapat bertemu semula dengan anak isterinya apabila "tersendra" di Rafa sesuatu menakjubkan. Ia bukan sahaja mengejutkan Nadir al Nuri tetapi seluruh rakyat Malaysia terkejut atas kejayaan misi mempertemukan keluarga yang terpisah ini. Nadir Al Nuri sendiri dalam catatan aprisasi kejayaan itu, mezahirkan rasa bersyukur kerana dapat bertemu semula dengan anak dan isterinya selepas terpisah akibat perang di Palestin berbulan-bulan. Tanpa siapa mengetahui usaha mempersatukan semula keluarga anak pemimpin Pas itu diusahakan oleh Farhan atas restui Perdana Menteri. Anwar pula menggunakan sepenuhnya konteks beliau dengan pemimpin di negara-negara bergolak itu khasnya di Palestin untuk mempertemukan semula ayah, ibu dan anak-anak terpisah itu. Nadir Al Nuri sendiri tidak yakin dengan usaha itu dimana beliau menganggap misi mempersatukan semula keluarganya iru Misi Gila yang bahaya. Apa dialami Nadir Al Nuri dan anak isterinya itu seperti mati hidup semula. Kejayaan misi ini layak untuk dianugerahkan piala seperti Hadiah Nobel baik buat Farhan maupun perdana menteri. Demikianlah komitmen seorang perdana menteri yang mempedulikan nasib rakyatnya tanpa mengira siapa mereka. Dan Anwar pula bertuah kerana mempunyai setiausaha politik seperti Farhan itu yang berkerja dalam senyap, membantu sesiapa sahaja tanpa menghebuhkan kepada umum, jauh sekali bersikap tidak menjawab WhatsApp yang dialamatkan kepadanya seperti salah seorang setiausaha politik Anwar. [wm.kl. 2:27 am 21/04/2024]

Bila terdesak, Exco Pas Terengganu terpaksa jadi DUBUK untuk tutupi kelemahan dan kegagalannya menipu mangsa mangsa yang taksub fanatik, iaitu walaun. Nak tunjuk dia buat kerja. Itu belum lagi kes BERAS GANU, keluaran syarikat TADC, Anak syarikat Perbadanan ktisad Negeri Terengganu yang dirasmikan oleh dia. Semalam kami semak di Pasaraya semua takda stok. Di media sosial dia sibuk serang Kerajaan Madani pasal beras putih tempatan takda dalam pasaran, last last jenama beras keluaran Kerajaan Negeri Terengganu pun takda stok!!!! Dubuk suka makan bangkai, beras yang dibuang Di Kuala Krau pun dia tetap jadikan isu lapuk nak salahkan Kerajaan skrg, walhal tu bekas Timbalan Menteri Dalam Negeri zaman Muhyiddin jadi PM, Hadi Awang jadi Duta Timur Tengah. Beli untuk kempen pilihanraya! Dubuk dan bubuk agaknya adalah spesis walaun yang suka memusnahkan benda baik untuk manusia. Cuma kalini ya Dubuk ya adalah Dr Azman Ibrahim, Adun Pas Jabi dan Exco Pertanian Kerajaan Terengganu! Syam Ghaz

kartunis politik, Zunar membuat kejutan apabila berkolaborasi untuk single muzik bertajuk Cari-Cari Salah (Mencari Kesalahan). Lagu itu yang dipersembahkan oleh artis baharu Indonesia, Novita All mula ditayangkan di saluran YouTube rasmi Baby Shima pada Jumaat lalu (19 April). Zunar ketika ditanya mengesahkan, ini adalah percubaan pertamanya sebagai penulis lirik, sambil menambah lagu tersebut diilhamkan oleh salah satu ilustrasinya. Tidak seperti kebanyakan lagu dangdut bertemakan cinta, Cari-Cari Salah mengupas tentang isu sosial, mengambil idea terhadap masalah kemunafikan agama. Sifat lagu yang berunsur politik jelas dalam liriknya, yang ditulis oleh Zunar atau nama sebenarnya Zulkiflee Anwar Haque. Lagu ini memang khusus ditujukan kepada golongan munafik agama, mereka yang mengajar sesuatu perkara tetapi mengamalkan yang lain. Ini bukan tuduhan kepada individu-individu agama secara keseluruhan. Mereka layak dihormati, tetapi ini ditujukan kepada mereka yang berpura-pura bertakwa. Dalam pengamatan saya, Malaysia mempunyai individu-individu seperti itu (penunggang agama), katanya ketika dihubungi Scoop. Lirik lagu tersebut mengkritik sikap munafik, terutamanya memfokuskan kepada individu yang secara luaran menampilkan perwatakan alim tetapi melakukan perbuatan bertentangan. Mereka digambarkan sebagai hakim yang sentiasa mencari kesalahan orang lain sambil mengabaikan kekurangan sendiri. Lirik lagu Cari-Cari Salah diilhamkan oleh salah satu ilustrasi Zunar. Gambar Zunar.my, 20 April, 2024 Zunar turut menyentuh topik keserakahan dan ketidakpercayaan, memperlihatkan walaupun mereka mendakwa mematuhi ajaran agama, individu itu didorong oleh keinginan mementingkan diri sendiri, seperti keinginan berkahwin dengan beberapa wanita walaupun sudah beristeri, dan berbuat demikian atas alasan yang salah. Menjelaskan mengenai kerjasama yang mengejutkan itu, Zunar mendedahkan bahawa idea tersebut datang daripada Baby Shima (nama sebenar Nor Ashima Ramli) berikutan kontroversi membabitkan tokoh agama tertentu. Sementara itu, peminat Baby Shima menyedari ada perkataan Walaun disebut dalam video berkenaan, ia adalah istilah pejoratif yang biasanya digunakan untuk menggambarkan penyokong konservatif Perikatan Nasional (PN). Di sebalik nada politik, Zunar menekankan bahawa lagu itu mewakili langkah berani bagi golongan wanita di Malaysia. Banyak wanita menghadapi pelbagai bentuk pelecehan dan berjuang untuk menyuarakan kebimbangan mereka. Ini merupakan langkah yang berani, katanya. 20 April 2024

Menteri sendiri? Yang disinggung oleh saudara itu Presiden kami, Perdana Menteri kita semua. Mungkin saudara bukan walanon tetapi saudara tetap salah seorang Ketua Pemuda dalam gabungan parti pemerintah hari ini, katanya dalam satu kenyataan malam tadi. ... Duri dalam daging Dalam ekonomi tidak menentu dgn peperangan Palestin, Israel, Russia, Ukraine dan Iran, jika negara kita politik terus bergolak ia hanya akan memusnahkan untuk pemulihan ekonomi. Mana tidaknya, Akmal Saleh dan Wee Ka Siong bertindak seolah-olah mereka adalah wakil dari parti pembangkang atau seolah-olah deep state untuk kerajaan. Sepatutnya, kedua-dua mereka membantu kerajaan dengan menggunakan saluran dalaman parti. Namun, perwatakan mereka bukan sahaja tidak profesional malah seperti menjadi duri dalam daging Kerajaan Perpaduan ini. Dr Akmal Saleh Nasihat saya buat adik Akmal Saleh walaupun saya tahu nasihat ini tidak akan dipedulikan kerana nasihat Presidennya sendiri tidak dipedulikan, tetapi dengarlah Akmal UMNO ditolak oleh orang Melayu sejak 2008 lagi. Grafnya menurun dan semakin menurun pada PRU2013 dan akhirnya PRU2018 orang Melayu menolak parti ini. Kepercayaan orang Melayu kepada UMNO semakin terhakis kerana isu korupsi. Kebersamaan UMNO dengan Kerajaan Perpaduan sepatutnya diambil kesempatan untuk memulihkan parti orang Melayu ini. Pelbagaikan aktiviti menyantuni rakyat di seluruh negara dan pulihkan imej UMNO bahawa parti ini benar-benar berubah. Imej UMNO perlu diperbaiki dan tidak boleh menumpang sama ada dengan PN dan PH selama lamanya. Jika tidak, parti ini akan karam selama-lamanya. Nasihat saya buat Akmal sebagai anak muda, bawa reformasi parti UMNO. Parti ini kena banyak muhasabah. Katakan UMNO yang akan bangkit ini bukan UMNO yang dulu. UMNO kena lari imej gila kuasa utk kepentingan peribadi pemimpin yg membuatkan org Melayu berpindah kpd parti2 lain akhir2 ini. Mana tahu ketika Akmal menerajui parti ini suatu hari nanti UMNO akn pulih. Buat Zuhdi semoga saranan ini sebagai titik permulaan utk PAS boleh bekerjasama dgn kerajaan. Demi agama, demi negara sewajarnya parti2 Melayu hentikan sengketa dan fokus utk pulihkan negara. Saya secara peribadi jika ia berlaku saya tidak malu2 menghulurkan salam pendamaian dgn PAS. Politik dinamik, politik berubah demi negara dan itu tujuan kita berpolitik. Musuh tidak selamanya musuh dan kawan tidak selamanya kawan. Ini negara kita bersama dan ia perlukan kebersamaan di kalangan pemimpin Melayu utk menyelamatkan ya demi utk anak cucu kita. Sumber Berita 1. https://harapandaily.com/2024/04/20/h... 2. https://harapandaily.com/2024/04/20/b...

minoriti agama. Kerajaan ini patut menunaikan janjinya. Melainkan para menteri dan pemimpinnya menunjukkan apa yang diperlukan mereka bagi mendapatkan penghormatan, kepercayaan dan belas kasihan, Madani hanya akan kekal sebagai satu lagi slogan kosong. Bukanlah sesuatu yang berlebihan untuk pihak kerajaan berusaha untuk mendengar pandangan alternatif. Walaupun tiada apa yang dicapai, sekurang-kurangnya dialog telah berlaku dan kedua-dua pihak mengakui pendirian mereka. Kita tidak mahu pendekatan autokratik dari atas ke bawah, seperti yang berlaku selama beberapa dekad yang lalu. READ MORE: The 'Madani' failure! Ia sesuatu yang cukup menyedihkan apabila isu antara agama masih tidak dapat diselesaikan di Malaysia pada hari ini. Seperti yang dihuraikan dengan jelas oleh Profesor Emeritus Osman Bakar dalam kertas kerjanya mengenai dialog antara agama dan tamadun: Pluralisme etnik dan serantau merupakan isu kontemporari bagi Nabi (SAW) kerana wawasannya adalah, antara lainnya, untuk mewujudkan pluralisme Arab sebagai sebuah model kehidupan berbilang kepercayaan serta etnik yang diasaskan berdasarkan prinsip kerohanian yang boleh dilihat oleh masyarakat masa depan bagi mendapatkan inspirasi. Kita mesti beralih daripada hanya seputar agenda anda, saya dan mereka kepada satu bentuk keharmonian, kerana kita berkongsi rasa kemanusiaan yang sama. Inilah bentuk kepimpinan yang kita harapkan daripada kerajaan Madani ini. Kegagalannya dalam menguruskan isu stokin baru-baru ini menunjukkan kepada kita berapa ramai sebenarnya daripada mereka yang benar-benar komited kepada visi Madani. PM sendiri secara peribadi harus mengadakan latihan lanjutan untuk menteri-menterinya dalam hal ini. Jika kerajaan tidak menunjukkan kepimpinan dalam menguruskan isu-isu sebegini, ia seakan samalah menyerahkan negara kepada golongan pentaksub dan ahli politik yang bodoh untuk menguruskannya. Mereka ini langsung tidak mempunyai isu yang relevan untuk diperjuangkan kepada semua rakyat. Sebaliknya, mereka hanya berselindung di sebalik topeng agama dan mendedahkan kemunafikan mereka. Soalan utama untuk kita tanyakan ialah, adakah Madani itu sesuatu yang benar?! K Haridas Editor bersama, surat berita Aliran 15 April 2024 Terjemahan oleh: Zikri Rahman The views expressed in Aliran's media statements and the NGO statements we have endorsed reflect Aliran's official stand. Views and opinions expressed in other pieces published here do not necessarily reflect Aliran's official position. AGENDA RAKYAT - Lima perkara utama 1. Tegakkan maruah serta kualiti kehidupan rakyat 2. Galakkan pembangunan saksama, lestari serta tangani krisis alam sekitar 3. Raikan kerencaman dan keterangkuman 4. Selamatkan demokrasi dan angkatkan keluhuran undang-undang 5. Lawan rasuah dan kronisme

(JIKSPA) Bilangan 3 Tahun 2024 yang diadakan sebentar tadi hampir memuktamadkan penambahbaikan struktur gaji baharu penjawat awam, yang seterusnya akan diputuskan di dalam mesyuarat Jemaah Menteri. Saya telah mempengerusikan Mesyuarat Jawatankuasa Induk Kajian Sistem Saraan Perkhidmatan Awam (JIKSPA) Bilangan 3 Tahun 2024 hari ini bagi membincangkan secara lebih lanjut berhubung struktur gaji penjawat awam. Alhamdulillah, mesyuarat hari ini hampir memuktamadkan penambahbaikan struktur gaji baharu penjawat awam, yang seterusnya akan diputuskan di dalam mesyuarat Jemaah Menteri. Saya ingin tegaskan komitmen Kerajaan untuk menyelesaikan usaha menambah baik struktur gaji penjawat awam yang dilaksanakan menerusi Kajian SSPA, disebalik ekonomi negara yang mencabar kesan ketidaktentuan geopolitik dunia, jelas Anwar di laman media sosial rasmi beliau hari ini. Katanya, kerajaan mengambil pendirian dan tanggungjawab tersebut dengan mengambil kira tekanan kos sara hidup bagi penjawat awam terutamanya yang berpendapatan rendah. Katanya, kerajaan mengambil pendirian dan tanggungjawab tersebut dengan mengambil kira tekanan kos sara hidup bagi penjawat awam terutamanya yang berpendapatan rendah. Insya-Allah, cadangan penambahbaikan termasuk usaha meningkatkan kadar pendapatan bersih penjawat awam akan saya umumkan pada perhimpunan Hari Pekerja nanti. Semoga usaha ini menjadi motivasi buat penjawat awam untuk meningkatkan produktiviti dan memberikan perkhidmatan yang terbaik kepada rakyat, ujar beliau. KOSMO! ONLINE.

Shatiri Mansor menjadi saksi hahah

isu tular yang berlaku dan mengambil langkah segera dengan menjalankan siasatan melalui KPB Cawangan Temerloh ke lapangan. Turut hadir ke lokasi adalah pihak Perbadanan Pengurusan Sisa Pepejal dan Pembersihan Awam (SWCorp). "Lokasi kejadian tersebut berlaku di tempat pembuangan sampah berhampiran Jalan Pintasan Rumpun Makmur - Gunung Senyum, Kuala Krau, Temerloh, Pahang. Berdasarkan penemuan awal, pihak KPB Cawangan Temerloh mendapati bahawa beras-beras tersebut telah rosak dan tidak sesuai serta tidak selamat untuk dimakan," kata kenyataan itu. Terdahulu pagi ini, bekas Ahli Parlimen Kuala Krau, Datuk Seri Ismail Mohamed Said dalam kenyataan mengakui beras yang dibuang itu adalah miliknya yang sebelum ini disimpan secara pukul untuk memenuhi keperluan penduduk di kawasannya. Ismail berkata, barangan dapur itu terpaksa dilupuskan kerana sudah rosak dan tidak lagi sesuai untuk diagihkan. Katanya pembelian barangan dapur itu tidak melibatkan peruntukan Kerajaan Persekutuan atau Kerajaan Negeri Pahang serta tidak melibatkan peruntukan barangan dalam tempoh Covid-19 atau persiapan menghadapi banjir "Barangan dapur ini disediakan menggunakan peruntukan peribadi, sebelum tempoh Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU) ke-15 pada tahun 2022. "Umum mengetahui bahawa dalam tempoh berkempen tiada sebarang pemberian barangan kepada orang awam dibenarkan. "Saya mengambil tanggungjawab dan sangat menyesali perkara ini dan memohon maaf kepada semua pihak atas kekhilafan dalam memantau cara pelupusan barangan dapur berkenaan," katanya. Untuk rekod, Ismail memegang kerusi Parlimen Kuala Krau selama empat penggal bersama Barisan Nasional sebelum tewas kepada calon Perikatan Nasional, Kamal Ashaari pada Pilihan Raya Umum ke-15. beras

kuasa Lembaga Pengampunan dan wewenang sepenuhnya Yang di-Pertuan Agong atau Raja-raja Melayu. "Oleh itu semua pihak sepatutnya terima kenyataan tersebut dan terus dengan tumpuan kita untuk jamin keamanan, perkukuhkan kestabilan politik dan membangunkan negara," katanya kepada pemberita usai solat Jumaat di Masjid Bandar Teknologi Kajang, Selangor, petang tadi. Selain itu, berkenaan afidavit yang difailkan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi, Perdana Menteri berkata beliau juga maklum dengan perkara berkenaan. Namun katanya, pendirian kerajaan adalah tidak mencabar sebarang keputusan melibatkan institusi beraja di mahkamah, selain menjelaskan afidavit yang dibawa Zahid Hamidi atas kapasitinya sebagai Presiden UMNO. "Urusan Raja-Raja tidak harus dicabar jadi sebab itu saya tidak mahu ulas selain menyatakan ini prinsip kerajaan sejak merdeka," katanya lagi. Menerusi afidavit dibawa Ahmad Zahid pada 9 April lalu, beliau dimaklumkan mengenai kewujudan titah itu oleh Menteri Pelaburan, Perdagangan dan Industri, Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz ketika pertemuan di rumah Presiden UMNO berkenaan di Country Heights, 30 Januari tahun lalu. Zahid dilaporkan berkata, beliau melihat dan membaca Titah Adendum itu dan jelas dengan isi kandungannya.

setempat memboikot PRK berkenaan. ... Kerjasama Parti Sosial Malaysia (PSM) dengan Ikatan Demokratik Malaysia (Muda) mungkin menyaksikan mereka meletakkan calon untuk cuba merampas kerusi Kuala Kubu Bharu pada 11 Mei ini. Ketika dihubungi, Timbalan Pengerusi PSM, S Arutchelvan, mengesahkan bahawa partinya sedang mengadakan perbincangan dengan Muda untuk melihat kemungkinan bertanding di situ. "Benar, kami sedang berbincang dengan Muda dan mungkin bertanding di PRK. "Kalau semuanya nampak bagus, mungkin salah satu parti akan bertanding dan satu parti lagi akan membantu kempen," katanya. Sumber Berita 1. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/702

CONVICTIONS by Court, and to date does not include HOUSE ARREST in Malaysia.... Can pardon powers include special privileges for some prisoners, who are 'friends' of the King or government of the day? Many in Malaysia believed for a long time that past Prime Ministers and Cabinet members, and ruling party members were abusing the powers and 'stealing' government funds of the people, and they believed that law enforcers and those in the administration of justice were wrongly 'closing their eyes' - for these 'powerful people' were ABOVE the law, and 'protected'. But, alas it was a belief only, with no real proof... After GE14, when Pakatan Harapan finally ousted the BN regime, who were in power since Independence, finally things started moving and 'suspected' criminals were being investigated, prosecuted, tried and convicted. Najib Razak's trial and conviction was very important as he was the former Prime Minister and former head of BN - and these meant all the other lesser politicians will also finally face justice. This made Malaysians hopeful for finally criminals will not escape but will have to pay for their crimes according to the law. Of course, in Najib's case, investigation and prosecution became inevitable as the 1MDB Scandal was not just a Malaysian scandal, but was a global scandal and many in many other countries were also being investigated, charged and tried for various related crimes. Unlike murder or simple theft, crimes committed by these politicians and their friends are complicated and sometimes crosses national boundaries... but SYABAS or CONGRATULATIONS to the Malaysian law enforcement for effectively investigating and prosecuting these cases... But then came Anwar Ibrahim as the Prime Minister after GE15 with his PH-led coalition - and things started changing. Somehow, what was achieved by PH before is now being overturned... Before GE15, PH main 'enemy' was Barisan Nasional(BN). After GE15, PH did not win the required number of parliamentary seats to form government on its own. The King suggested that PH forms a coalition government with PN (Perikatan Nasional) but then PN took a strong stand that it would not form a coalition government with PH. BN(30), PH(81), PN(74),GTA(0),GRS(6),GPS(23),OTH(8) The Sabah and Sarawak parties would normally join the government party that have sufficient seats. So, Pakatan Harapan had a CHOICE to make (a) Form government by entering into a coalition with BN; OR (b) Stay in Opposition and allow PN to try to form a government.. PH chose (a) and entered into a coalition government with its political enemy for decades, the BN. This was a MAJOR COMPROMISE, which many supporters of PH were not happy with. Should PH have stuck with its principles, values and reform agenda - and stayed in Opposition if it could not form government with other parties, as long as it was not BN? After DECADES, Malaysians decided to reject BN despite the risk of repercussions - Note BN had 79 MPs after GE14, and this became only 30 after GE15. The trend was the complete rejection of BN was coming soon. But, when PH joined BN to form government - BN got a lifeline that could revive BN, or alternatively bring down PH. It looks like come GE16, we may have a PH-BN Coalition - so, will this be seen as BN Baru? Even after the Sheraton Move, following the leaving of one PH Party(BERSATU) and many MPs from other PH Parties, where the highest number was from Anwar's PKR. The new coalition government then under PM Muhyiddin and then PM Ismail Sabri took the stand of not including MPs under investigation or facing trials('court cluster') in the Cabinet - they were just government Backbencher MPs. However, when Anwar became Prime Minister - The Deputy Prime Minister was UMNO/BN Chairperson Zahid Hamidi who was facing several trials, and the Deputy Finance Minister was also from UMNO Ahmad Maslan.. Then, we had Najib's Pardon that halved his sentence - Note that the King acts on the advice of the Pardons Board - made up of the Attorney General, a Minister and 3 others. After Anwar's pardon soon after PH won in GE14 created the perception that the government has great influence or 'control' of who the King/Rulers pardon, so many saw Najib's pardon was because of PH and BN coalition government... Then there were other things the Anwar's government did # It 'helped' Zahid Hamidi stay on as President. Apparently, in the midst of an UMNO General Meeting a motion was tabled that there be no contest for the top 2 position - that means no other deserving candidate can be nominated or contest to become President or No. 2. A complaint was lodged with the Registrar of Society, who reasonably would have decided that this 'Motion/Resolution' was illegal being contrary to UMNO's constitution or the law - Then the HOME MINISTER stepped in and granted an EXEMPTION which allowed UMNO to go against its rules/constitution and/or the law(Societies Act). Home Minister's exemption to UMNO questionable? Was there ''illegality, irrationality or unreasonableness'? No Minister has absolute discretion to do as he pleases... Will PM Anwar REPEAL draconian Societies Act? The Act to prevent registrations of Political Parties, to make unlawful societies,...???? ## One of the biggest hurdle for the prosecution is to prove PRIMA FACIE case, all the elements of the charge whereby if the accussed fails to raise REASONABLE DOUBT during the Defence case will result in conviction and sentencing. So, the decision of the AG/Public Prosecutor to discontinue the criminal case of Zahid Hamidi at the defence stage was rather ODD. If DPP Raja Rozela Raja Toran continues to prosecute, Zahid Hamidi will likely be convicted and sentenced? Come back and prosecute to the end.. When AG who discontinued Zahid's case gets appointed Chairman of a GLC - A question of public perception? Judges/Courts confused by 'badly drafted' law - Parliament must CLARIFY whether when Prosecutor discontinues a case, the accussed is to be acquitted or DNAAed as of right? Zahid Hamidi's DNAA?? NGO gesa prosiding penjelasan isu DNAA Zahid disiar langsung(Malaysian Insight) Live Broadcast/Hansard for all Parliamentary Select Committee (Zahid's DNAA) - A media statement What happened to Zahid's DNAA Parliamentary Committee? Separation of AG from Public Prosecutor important but the DNAA? Zahid Hamidi's can always be charged again, the trial reinstated and continued - section 254A CPC? Explaining and concerns? Another UMNO politician cases:- Datuk Seri Bung Moktar Radin and his wife Datin Seri Zizie Izette Abd Samad were freed from all corruption charges involving RM2.8 million.High Court Judge Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid acquitted and discharged the couple from the case today.He made the decision after ruling that the Sessions Court erred in ordering Bung Moktar and Zizie Izette to enter their defence on Sept 2, last year. On May 3, 2019, Bung Moktar was charged with two charges of accepting bribes of RM2.2 million and RM262,500 as an inducement to obtain Felcra approval to invest RM150 million in Public Mutual unit trusts. - NST, 7/9/2023 Was there any former BN politician charged for abuse of power, corruption, money laundering, etc - crimes committed when they were Ministers or MPs of the government party during the BN rule? Even prosecution appeals against the acquittals of then BN leaders are getting delayed and delayed... Zahid Hamidi - Court of Appeal not respected? No more adjournments - Let COA hear the appeal. CLEAN and idependent administration of justice is fundamental. With the reason alleged Pardon of Najib that saw the sentence being cut in half, people were unhappy. We have yet to see the Pardon Decision of the King, all we have seen is a statement by the Pardons Board - True, the King has to do as advised by the Pardons Board - but still the final Pardon Decision should be issued by the King or the Palace, as was done when Anwar Ibrahim was pardoned. Najib's PARDON now may have serious impact to Malaysia, Malaysian law enforcement, prosecution and courts? Najib's Pardon - King, not Pardon Board have the power - As the King did not tell us when he was King, is there any consequences? PARDON - Discrimination, only for some? Should Shafee's disclosure that could invalidate Najib's pardon be acted on? A law on PARDONS? N ow, there is allegation that the King's Pardon also said that Najib was to serve his remaining prison sentence at home ...under 'house arrest'. If TRUE, this is a VERY SERIOUS issue - WHY DID PM ANWAR IBRAHIM OR THE GOVERNMENT NOT TELL US THEN ABOUT THIS 'HOUSE ARREST' THINGY THAT THE KING ALLEGEDLY ORDERED? This was NOT in the Pardon Boards public statement. Even if the King makes a WRONG orders about Najib's Pardon, NOT as advised by the Pardons Board or against the Constitution/Law, then rightly the Pardons Board(which includes the Attorney General) and maybe the Prime Minister ought to have informed him of the mistake - so that the King can revise it and come out with a Pardons Order that is correct and in accordance to law. The Pardons Board or the PM(or the Cabinet) cannot just reveal a part of the Order and not the full order. This is wrong and may also be DISRESPECT to the King? Interestingly, now the Deputy Prime Minister also admits that he knew about the 'additional order' - so why did he not reveal it then as the Pardon happened at the end of February 2024? Did the Deputy hide it from Prime Minister Anwar? Or did Anwar Ibrahim also know but elected not to DISCLOSE it, or act upon it? The King's Pardon Order must be disclosed to the public - Transparency Please. In the document, the Umno president[DPM Zahid Hamidi] said he was shown the document by former Selangor Umno treasurer Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz at his (Ahmad Zahid's) house at Country Heights on Jan 30 ...I further sighted that the addendum order is dated Jan 29 and has the seal and signature of His Majesty Seri Paduka Baginda the Yang di-Pertuan Agong XVI. Was it Prime Minister's plan to delay the disclosure of the 'addendum order' - because the Malaysian public was already angry that Najib's sentence was cut in half? Will Anwar also be filing an Affidavit - after all he is the Prime Minister? Anyway, we will see what happens in court? Anwar Ibrahim commented on Zahid Hamidi's Affidavit - Commenting on his deputys affidavit filed in Najibs application for judicial review of his partial pardon, Anwar said it was Zahids prerogative to do so. He (submitted the affidavit) in his capacity as the Umno president, and the attorney general represented the Pardons Board, Anwar was quoted as saying by the Malaysiakini news portal.ed the affidavit) in his capacity as the Umno president, and the attorney general represented the Pardons Board, Anwar was quoted as saying by the Malaysiakini news portal. We remain steadfast that all decisions involving the Malay Rulers cannot be challenged. I do not wish to comment further as this has been our (the governments) principle since independence. Comments :- Foolish, because Zahid Hamidi was the Deputy Prime Minister when the Pardon was given until now. Did the Deputy Prime Minister inform the Prime Minister and the Cabinet at the material time about the alleged 'adendum order' about house arrest? Or did he keep the PM and the Cabinet, and the Parliament in the dark? Anwar, being Prime Minister cannot not affirm an Affidavit in Najib's application for Judicial Review - as there are material questions that he must tell us - was he aware of any such 'addendum order', part of the King's Pardon, and when did he become aware of it and why did he not act on it? Who is in the Pardon's Board - the Attorney General(appointed by King on the advice of PM Anwar Ibrahim), the Minister in charge of Federal Territories( (appointed by King on the advice of PM Anwar Ibrahim, and also member of the Cabinet), and the 3 other members of the Pardon Board(again reasonably appointed by King on the advice of the Prime Minister) Implementation of the Pardon Order - well, again it is the Executive Branch led by the Prime Minister. House Arrest(even if possible) - there is FINANCIAL IMPLICATION as prison officers will need to secure the premises, so that the prisoner does not escape his place of detention. Then, the bigger problem is that there is still law stipulating how 'house arrest' works. So, Anwar cannot say he is not involved... Also note that the Pardons Board statement was issued under the PRIME MINISTER's Department letterhead. Anyway, all in all, the Malaysian people and the international community are watching - what happens in court will affect public perception of Anwar and PH... Royal addendum for Najib's house arrest is real, says Zahid By NURBAITI HAMDAN Nation Wednesday, 17 Apr 2024 3:28 PM MYT KUALA LUMPUR: The Royal addendum from the former Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Riayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah, which would allow Datuk Seri Najib Razak to go under house arrest, does exist, claims Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi. The Deputy Prime Minister said this in his affidavit in support of Najib's application for leave to commence judicial review in relation to the royal addendum he claimed was granted to him along with his royal pardon. In the document, the Umno president said he was shown the document by former Selangor Umno treasurer Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz at his (Ahmad Zahid's) house at Country Heights on Jan 30. Ahmad Zahid said Tengku Zafrul showed him a copy of the addendum order on his (Tengku Zafrul's) phone which he personally photographed or scanned from an original copy as shown to him by the former YDPA. The contents of the addendum order expressly stated that the applicant (Najib) be allowed to serve the reduced sentence of his imprisonment under condition of house arrest, instead of the current prison confinement in the Kajang Prison. I further sighted that the addendum order is dated Jan 29 and has the seal and signature of His Majesty Seri Paduka Baginda the Yang di-Pertuan Agong XVI. I further confirm that the addendum order is genuine and in fact is the Royal Prerogative Order as the Main Order. I verily believe that for the sufficient period of time I sighted and read the addendum order, and I clearly saw the entire contents and that it forms part of the pardon process. Thus, I hereby confirm the existence of the addendum order dated Jan 29 issued by the former King, Ahmad Zahid stated in the affidavit dated April 9. The affidavit is accessible to the public on the judiciary website. Previously, the court was told that a "crucial witness" would be supporting Najib's application in his bid to go under house arrest. Ahmad Zahid, however, stated that he did not have a copy of the impugned document due to confidentiality and propriety, especially in the light of the fact that the addendum order had by then not been executed or enforced. He said he believed that other government members have seen the addendum order apart from him and Tengku Zafrul. Specifically, I am aware that Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail (Pahang menteri besar) has also seen a copy of the addendum order and can confirm the same. I am further verily informed that the Attorney General (AG) has the original copy of the addendum order for his legal input on the same, Ahmad Zahid said. Earlier, the High Court barred the press from covering the hearing of Najib's leave application at the request of Najib's lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah. Muhammad Shafee said the matter should be moved in-chambers due to its sensitive nature. Senior Federal Counsels Shamsul Bolhassan and Ahmad Hanir Hambaly did not object. Justice Amarjeet Singh allowed the application. The judge fixed June 5 to deliver his decision. - Star, 17/4/2024 Zahid didnt use official position to support Najib, says Anwar Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim with the public at Gerai Kak Ngah Billion in Bandar Teknologi Kajang for lunch before performing Friday prayers, April 19, 2024. The prime minister said today that Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi issued an affidavit in support of ex-prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the formers capacity as Umno president. Bernama pic By Justin Ong Friday, 19 Apr 2024 4:38 PM MYT KUALA LUMPUR, April 19 Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi issued an affidavit in support of ex-prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in the formers capacity as Umno president, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said today. Commenting on his deputys affidavit filed in Najibs application for judicial review of his partial pardon, Anwar said it was Zahids prerogative to do so. He (submitted the affidavit) in his capacity as the Umno president, and the attorney general represented the Pardons Board, Anwar was quoted as saying by the Malaysiakini news portal.ed the affidavit) in his capacity as the Umno president, and the attorney general represented the Pardons Board, Anwar was quoted as saying by the Malaysiakini news portal. We remain steadfast that all decisions involving the Malay Rulers cannot be challenged. I do not wish to comment further as this has been our (the governments) principle since independence. On Wednesday, Zahid was identified as the critical witness supporting Najibs bid to compel the federal government and the Pardons Board to produce a purported supplementary order from the previous Yang di-Pertuan Agong. Zahids affidavit also claimed that Minister of Investment, Trade, and Industry Senator Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Aziz had affirmed the existence of the supplementary order. Tengku Zafrul subsequently said he would apply to correct certain factual errors, but did not specify the errors. In his application for leave to seek judicial review filed on April 1, Najib claimed the former Agong issued the order during the January 29 meeting of the board, for the former to serve the remainder of his reduced sentence under house arrest. On February 2, the Pardons Board halved Najibs sentence from a 12-year prison term to six years for misappropriating funds amounting to RM42 million, which means he may be released earlier on August 23, 2028. - Malay Mail, 19/4/2024

membawa kepada rasa dukacita Sultan Selangor. "Pemuda Pas seharusnya menyiasat punca di sebalik tindakan ahli-ahli mereka menghina sultan secara terbuka. Mungkin ada kekurangan dalam pemahaman terhadap nilai-nilai kebudayaan dan sensitiviti terhadap institusi monarki," katanya. Danial yang juga Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri Batu Tiga berkata siasatan juga perlu melihat kesan dan implikasi dari kenyataan Presiden Pas yang mungkin memberi kesan langsung kepada sikap dan tindakan ahli-ahli parti. "Kesedaran terhadap betapa pentingnya menghormati institusi monarki harus disemai dari puncanya termasuk dari kalangan pemimpin tertinggi parti itu sendiri. "Jangan hanya berani menyeru tindakan kepada ahli biasa, tetapi menutup mata terhadap kebiadaban pimpinan parti," katanya. Dalam pada itu, Danial menghargai kenyataan media yang dikeluarkan oleh Pemuda Pas Johor dan Selangor berhubung tindakan seorang ahli mereka menghina sultan amat dihargai. "Penghormatan terhadap institusi monarki adalah asas penting dalam masyarakat Malaysia. Kenyataan media tersebut menunjukkan kesedaran terhadap nilai-nilai kebudayaan dan tradisi yang perlu dijaga dalam menjaga keharmonian sosial. "Gesaan Pemuda Pas Selangor agar tindakan tatatertib diambil terhadap individu terbabit juga penting untuk memastikan kredibiliti parti itu di mata masyarakat awam," katanya. Sebelum ini tular hantaran seorang ahli Pas Hezry Yasin menerusi Facebook berhubung keengganannya untuk mengaminkan doa buat Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan sultan ketika menunaikan solat Jumaat di Johor baru-baru ini. Bagaimanapun, hantaran itu telah dipadamkan. Pemuda Pas Selangor dalam kenyataannya semalam menyerahkan kepada polis untuk menyiasat dan mengambil tindakan lanjut berhubung kenyataan bekas ahli jawatankuasa sayap parti itu. "Pemuda Pas Selangor menyerahkan kepada Jawatankuasa Tatatertib Pas untuk mengambil sebarang tindakan yang wajar sekiranya tindakan Hezry itu melanggar displin parti," kata Setiausahanya, Aubidullah Fahim.

la ek? Sebab yang minum tu orang bukan Islam. Ke macam mana ni? Pening jadinya walaun. Kalau nak tahu, inilah ertinya peribahasa . Dah salah pun masih tak mahu mebgaku. . Agaknya ada tak gambar air manusia minum air lepas ni? Tanya je. Guane boh? Raja Gelap II .

bumi ini, menjadi wali atau wakil Allah untuk menjaga seluruh isi alam semesta ini. Ia suatu amanah yang besar. Menjadi pemimpin bukan setakat menikmati apa-apa kemudahan dan fasalitis disediakan menerusi jawatan demikian. Jauh sekali untuk dijadikan kebanggaan atau meraih glamour dan menjadi selaku harta pusaka daripadanya. Jawatan bukan untuk dimegahi dan meraih untuk kepentingan peribadi. Kerana memahami tanggungjawab dan amanah seorang pemimpin itulah, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Na'im Mokhtar tidak mementingkan soal protokol atau memilih majlis/lokasi untuk hadir dan melihat majlis bakal dihadirinya dihias atau melihat ia selesa atau tidak. Beliau seorang menteri yang simple dan humble lebihmementingkan kualiti kerja daripada bergaya. Bekas Presiden Mahkamah Syariah ini nampaknya benar-benar menghayati semangat, sifat dan akhlak yang perlu ada kepada seseorang pimipin seperti mana digariskan oleh Islam yang diteladankan oleh para khalifah di zaman lampau. Kehebatan daulat Islam lebih 1500 tahun antara lain kerana ketinggian pekerti dan budi para pemimpinnya. Dalam hal ini, bagi Na'im apa yang perlu utamakan ialah mutu kepimpinan yang perlu dipamerkan dan digunakan peluang dan kesempatan itu seoptimanya untuk berkhidmat kepada masyarakat. Malam tadi, ketika para pemimpin lain, khasnya menteri sudah berihat atau berseronok dengan sanak saudara di rumah, atau melayan tetamu aidifitri, tetapi Menteri Agama ini turun ke Lembah Gelandangan di Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman untuk memantau dan berhari raya dengan para gelandangan dan mereka kurang bernasib baik. Kira-kira 500 khalayak berhimpun di Lembah Gelandangan itu untuk bertemu dan beraya dengan Menteri Agama ini. Dalam kunjungan Na'im secara spontan dan mengejutkan tanpa protokol itu beliau turut menyampaikan sedikit sumbangan kepada lebih 200 orang gelandangan, yang bermaustautin di situ dan ada juga yang datang dari kawasan luar. Paling merujakan, beliau bawa sama isterinya. Jarang menteri akan membawa isteri bersama untuk memasuki ke kawasan "semerawut" begitu. Biasanya menteri akan didampingi sang isteri di majlis-majlis selesa berhawa dingin serta didatang para pembesar lain sama. Selain itu turut sama bersama gelandangan malam tadi ialah Pemangku Ketua Pengarah Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan (MAIWP), Datuk Mohd Nizam Yahya dan Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif Yayasan Pembangunan Ekonomi Islam Malaysia (YaPEIM) Ameer Ali Vali Mohamed. Sebenarnya kehadiran Na'im dilokasi marhaen begitu bukan pertama kali. Sebelum ini beliau kelihatan mengunjungi rumah rumah anak yatim, orang tua dan sebagainya untuk beramah mesra dengan asnaf berkenaaan. Beliau juga turut sama memberi semangat dan sokongan dengan hadir sendiri ke majlis mengimarak masjid dan mengajak anak-anak muda ke acara solat berjemaaah Subuh Seperti Jumaat. Barang kali disinilah baiknya seorang bukan dari rahim politik atau mempunyai cita-cita politik diangkat menjadi menteri. Apa dilakukan Na'im lebih kepada menjalankan tanggungjawab yang diamanahkan daripada cuba membina kekuatan politik peribadi. [wm.kl. 9:22 am. 16/04/24]

dilaksana kerajaan bagi membawa keluar keluarganya dari wilayah bergolak Gaza. Muhammad Nadir dalam catatan '183 Hari Yang Panjang' menerusi hantaran di akaun Facebook serta Instragram beliau malam tadi telah mendedahkan Anwar adalah individu penting yang memainkan peranan utama dalam misi sukar tersebut. Beliau turut menyatakan rasa kagum terhadap diplomasi dimainkan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Anwar sehingga membolehkan misi itu dijalankan dengan sangat cepat, teratur dan lancar. Sementara itu Anwar melalui hantaran di laman sosialnya turut menyatakan penghargaan kepada Presiden Mesir, Abdel Fattah Al Sisi dan Kerajaan Mesir atas kerjasama yang diberikan, dalam membawa keluarga Muhammad Nadir Al-Nuri keluar dari kawasan bergolak itu.