untuk menyemak semula saraan semua penjawat awam sedia ada dan mengkaji opsyen pengambilan penjawat awam baharu dengan kaedah persaraan baharu seperti Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja (KWSP) menggantikan skim pencen sedia ada. "Sebagai seorang yang mempunyai ilmu agama, Abdul Hadi tidak seharusnya mengeluarkan kenyataan yang tidak memberi gambaran sebenar terhadap cadangan Kerajaan Persekutuan," katanya menerusi kenyataan. Dalam perkembangan sama, Nik Nazmi mendakwa Hj Hadi cuba memberi gambaran keliru bahawa caruman KWSP adalah tidak Islamik sedangkan dana persaraan itu turut memiliki pilihan simpanan syariah. "Pilihan simpanan syariah diuruskan dan dilaburkan mengikut prinsip syariah. Untuk memastikan prinsip syariah dipatuhi, suatu rangka kerja tadbir urus syariah diwujudkan untuk mentadbir urus aspek pematuhan syariah bagi simpanan pencarum," katanya. Nik Nazmi yang juga Pengerusi Majlis Pimpinan Negeri Keadilan Kelantan dan Terengganu berkata, cadangan menggantikan sistem pencen dengan caruman KWSP juga pernah diumumkan oleh agensi kerajaan Kelantan iaitu Yayasan Islam Kelantan (YIK) pada 2022 yang dinamakan Skim Jawatan Tetap Bercarum. "Mengapa semasa YIK mengumumkan cadangan ini tiada bantahan daripada Pas kalau hendak dikatakan KWSP tidak Islamik atau tidak mengikut ajaran Rasulullah SAW," katanya. Nik Nazmi berkata Pas seharusnya memiliki tanggungjawab moral untuk memastikan kebajikan guru Pusat Asuhan Tunas Islam (PASTI) milik parti itu yang ditubuhkan sejak lebih 30 tahun lepas terjaga, mengambil kira dakwaan guru terlibat tidak memiliki pelan persaraan termasuk KWSP selain dibayar di bawah paras gaji minimum RM1,500.

Hadi Awang mengutuskan warkah Menjunjung Kasih kepada Sultan Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah selepas mengeluarkan kenyataan ditujukan kepada alim ulama, peguam, hakim, Ahli Parlimen dan Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) serta Raja-Raja Melayu. Baginda menzahirkan rasa amat dukacita dengan kenyataan Abdul Hadi itu yang turut disiasat polis berhubung tulisannya, 'Ketinggian Islam Wajib Dipertahankan'. *Di Dewan Rakyat, Ahli Parlimen Tasek Gelugor, Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan mengakui kekhilafan kenyataannya pada minggu lalu mendakwa Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menyalahguna kuasa dan memohon maaf jika kenyataan dikeluarkannya menyentuh Yang di-Pertuan Agong. Susulan kenyataan itu, Wan Saiful terlepas daripada usul menggantung kehadiran Sidang Dewan Rakyat apabila Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi menarik balik, sebelum dipersetujui Speaker, Tan Sri Johari Abdul.* Walaupun tiada manusia tidak melakukan kesalahan, kita mengingatkan ahli politik, termasuk Ahli Parlimen sepatutnya menunjukkan teladan, terutama dalam adab dan etika dengan Yang di-Pertuan Agong serta Sultan. Bukankah semua ahli Dewan Rakyat dan Dewan Negara perlu mengangkat sumpah termasuk memelihara, melindungi dan mempertahankan Perlembagaannya dengan institusi diraja termaktub secara jelas? Hakikatnya, ahli politik terutama pemimpin parti tidak boleh menjatuhkan kedudukan mereka setaraf orang biasa seperti pempengaruh mudah-mudah memuat naik kandungan media sosial melampaui batas, tetapi kemudian meminta maaf. Mereka sepatutnya menunjukkan adab, etika dan integriti lebih tinggi daripada masyarakat umum termasuk kepada pemimpin bawahan dan ahli parti pada peringkat akar umbi kerana kalau guru makan berdiri, maka muridnya makan berlari. Justeru, kita meminta Ahli Parlimen dan Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN) menelaah tulisan pakar Perlembagaan, Prof Madya Datuk Dr Wan Ahmad Fauzi Wan Husain tersiar di Muka 10 hari ini menjelaskan kedudukan Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan Raja-Raja seperti termaktub dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan sama sekali berlainan dengan konsep Westminster di United Kingdom (UK). Jika ada perbezaan pandangan sekalipun, ia perlu disampaikan kepada baginda secara beradab kerana digariskan dalam Perlembagaan melalui amalan adat bangsa. Di sebalik permohonan maaf itu, kita meminta polis meneruskan siasatan seperti dilakukan kepada Menteri Besar Kedah sebelum ini yang walaupun meminta ampun, perlu berdepan dengan implikasi undang-undang. Ini kerana penyiasatan dan pendakwaan jika ada kes perlu dijalankan bukan sahaja set keadilan sama perlu dikenakan kepada semua tanpa mengira sama ada pemimpin politik mahupun orang biasa, bahkan sebagai pengajaran supaya tidak mengeluarkan kenyataan melampaui batas terutama kepada institusi diraja. ...a-ampun

Perniagaan (Business Model) Bagi Pembangunan Industri NR-REE di Malaysia daripada peringkat huluan sehingga ke peringkat hiliran. "Ia seterusnya, akan membentangkan hasil kajian tersebut bagi mendapatkan kelulusan di peringkat Mesyuarat Jemaah Menteri," katanya menerusi Waktu Pertanyaan Menteri di Dewan Rakyat, hari ini. Beliau berkata demikian bagi menjawab soalan Dr Ku Abd Rahman Ku Ismail (PN-Kubang Pasu) mengenai kemajuan REE negara selain langkah kerajaan menanggani REE di kawasan Hutan Simpanan Kekal (HSK). Mengulas lanjut, Nik Nazmi berkata kajian tersebut akan memberikan kefahaman jelas terhadap keseluruhan ekosistem industri NR-REE di Malaysia, serta boleh dijadikan rujukan dan panduan dalam pembangunan industri berkenaan. "Melihat kepada potensi industri ini, kerajaan juga mengalu-alukan pelaburan dari dalam dan luar negara untuk membangunkan sumber NR- REE melalui perkongsian strategik terutamanya dalam sektor pertengahan dan hiliran, penyelidikan, pembangunan, pengkomersialan dan inovasi (R) dan juga pemindahan pengetahuan dan teknologi," katanya. Namun, menurut Nik Nazmi dasar kementerian pada ketika ini masih tidak membenarkan perlombongan dijalankan dalam kawasan HSK berpandukan komitmen Malaysia untuk mengekalkan sekurang-kurangnya 50% daripada keluasan tanah negara sebagai hutan. "Walau bagaimanapun, dalam perbincangan di peringkat Majlis Mineral Negara dan Mesyuarat Menteri Besar dan Ketua Menteri, termasuk Perdana Menteri telah meminta kementerian memperhalusi serta menilai kebolehlaksanaan aktiviti perlombongan NR- REE dalam HSK melalui pembangunan projek perintis perlombongan di HSK," ujarnya.

support behind Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, he would be offered RM1.7mil in allocations, among others. The repeated message was that I must support Tambun as Prime Minister and I would receive parliamentary allocations. They said allocations for government projects could also be distributed to my cronies. They know Im having a hard time, with my wife also having cancer, he said. Wan Saiful also claimed that charges against him would be dropped if he pledged support. He is facing money laundering and corruption charges related to the Jana Wibawa project. They contacted me repeatedly until I decided to meet them one day, he said, alleging that several meetings took place at hotels in Kuala Lumpur and Petaling Jaya. I had to entertain their requests, as they had the power and I didnt know what they could do to me, he said. In my opinion, Wan Saiful should have REPORTED to the relevant law enforcement, be it the Police, MACC or other relevant bodies, about this crime or possible crime. A police report is VERY IMPORTANT, as this report also known as a First Information Report(FIR) is a requirement for the start of an investigation by police or law enforcement. The police/MACC/law enforcement can also file a FIR - In this case, after what Wan Saiful revealed in Parliament, it is more that likely that police and/or MACC have already filed the needed report(FIR) and the investigation into the alleged crime has begun, and now, if summoned, Wan Saiful must cooperate - and provide all needed information for the purposes of the investigation/s. BUT, then let us consider the crime reporting obligations of a person in Malaysia , including public servants - should there be amendments in law, to reduce the requirements or BURDENS imposed on one who reports , allowing for the reporting of any crime, even one that he heard about but does not have any real evidence... At present, Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure Code states 13Public to give information of certain matters (1) Every person aware - (a) of the commission of or the intention of any other person to commit any offence punishable under the Penal Code or any other written law ; or [(a) Subs. Act A1521:s.3 ] (b) of any sudden or unnatural death or death by violence or of any death under suspicious circumstances, or of the body of any person being found dead without its being known how that person came by death, shall in the absence of reasonable excuse, the burden of proving which shall lie upon the person so aware , immediately give information to the officer in charge of the nearest police station or to a police officer or the nearest penghulu of the commission or intention or of the sudden, unnatural or violent death or of the finding of the dead body, as the case may be. So, it is clear that Wan Saiful has indeed a reporting obligation of these crime/s. What is problematic with this section is the placement of 'burden of proving' or the maker of the police report. There should be no such burden - the purpose of a police report(or FIR) is to simply bring to the attention of the police(and/or relevant law enforcement bodies) the fact, or the SUSPICION/BELIEF that a crime may have been committed. FULL STOP. Then, the law enforcement will investigate ... IT is ABSURD to require a person reporting a crime with any burden whatsoever of proving the CRIME or proving what he reported to be true. No one, not even lawyers, KNOW all the offences under the Penal Code and/or any other written law. So, the reporting obligation must be to report a crime one is aware, or suspects may have occurred - and the phrase ' the burden of proving which shall lie upon the person so aware ,' must be deleted. Public report crimes or possible crimes, that they know or suspects may have occured - Then, relevant authority moves to INVESTIGATE. Would Wan Saiful come out saying that he did not know whether what happened was an actual crime under the Penal Code or other laws in Malaysia? He may say, he knew that what happened is wrong and maybe unethical - but he did not know that it was a crime, so he did make any police reports? Would Wan Saiful say that he did not report because he believed he could not fulfill the BURDEN of proving what he alleged, if he reported? That is why the law about obligation/duty of reporting crime or suspected crime need to be amended... Interestingly, the law was amended with regard to public officers that may DETER or prevent the reporting of crimes/misconducts committed by Ministers or the seniors.. Yes, on about 2014 vide PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) ACT 2014 , the following was introduced - where the penalty was so high - a fine of up to RM1 million???? Was keep quiet even if you know or suspect a crime the new policy??? 203ADisclosure of information (1) Whoever discloses any information or matter which has been obtained by him in the performance of his duties or the exercise of his functions under any written law shall be punished with fine of not more than one million ringgit , or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with both. (2) Whoever has any information or matter which to his knowledge has been disclosed in contravention of subsection (1) who discloses that information or matter to any other person shall be punished with fine of not more than one million ringgit, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with both. There must be an EXCEPTION added, that this duty/obligation of 'secrecy/confidentiality' does not apply for crimes/suspected crimes, or any misconduct/suspected misconducts. This will FREE public officers from having to KEEP QUIET even when a crime is committed by a Minister or another public officer, or others. We certainly do not want another 1MDB,... Maybe, Anwar's PH-led coalition government will do the needful - unless ... Can MACC compell Wan Saiful to lodge a report with regard to what he said in Parliament? Refer to HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT (PRIVILEGES AND POWERS) ACT 1952 (REVISED 1988), where section 7 says as follows:- 7Immunity of members from civil or criminal proceedings for anything done or said before the House No member shall be liable to any civil or criminal proceedings, arrest, imprisonment, or damages by reason of any matter or thing which he may have brought by petition, bill, resolution, motion, or otherwise, or have said before the House or any committee. In my opinion, even if Wan Saiful does not make a report of crimes suspected or alleged, MACC cannot do anything to compel him to do so. MACC should have simply invited Wan Saiful to come file a report...maybe he would have done so. However, since the matter is now public knowledge, MACC itself can file the need report(FIR) and begin investigations into the crimes alleged. And during the course of investigations, call Wan Saiful to come give evidence as a witness > whereby Wan Saiful will not be able to avoid this, and will have to attend and give a statement.. MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki said that under the MACC Act 2009, it is the responsibility of any individuals offered bribes to quickly report the offence so that further action can be taken.... IT IS CORRECT, see Section 25 of the Act 25Duty to report bribery transactions [ MALAYSIAN ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ACT 2009] (1) Any person to whom any gratification is given, promised, or offered, in contravention of any provision of this Act shall report such gift, promise or offer together with the name, if known, of the person who gave, promised or offered such gratification to him to the nearest officer of the commission or police officer. (2) Any person who fails to comply with subsection (1) commits an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine not exceeding one hundred thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or to both. (3) Any person from whom any gratification has been solicited or obtained, or an attempt has been made to obtain such gratification, in contravention of any provision of this Act shall at the earliest opportunity thereafter report such soliciting or obtaining of, or attempt to obtain, the gratification together with the full and true description and if known, the name of the person who solicited, or obtained, or attempted to obtain, the gratification from him to the nearest officer of the commission or police officer. (4) Any person who fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with subsection (3) commits an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine not exceeding ten thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both. Now, it is reported that he had apologized - so, did Wan Saiful LIE? Will he now go and lodge a report at MACC? Will MACC continue with the investigation? IF he did LIE, do we still want people who LIE as MPs? Best look at the Hansard on 5/3/2024 to determine what exactly happened. Should MACC not investigate the case of the 6 BERSATU(or rather PN MPs) - was there corruption? I was offered RM1.7mil in allocations to betray PN, says Wan Saiful By GERARD GIMINO, MARTIN CARVALHO and And TEH ATHIRA YUSOF Wednesday, 28 Feb 2024 12:35 PM MYT Photo: Bernama KUALA LUMPUR: A shouting match broke out in the Dewan Rakyat when an Opposition MP claimed he had been repeatedly induced to pledge support for the Prime Minister. While debating the motion of thanks on the Royal Address on Wednesday (Feb 28), Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan (PN-Tasek Gelugor) alleged that if he had thrown support behind Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, he would be offered RM1.7mil in allocations, among others. The repeated message was that I must support Tambun as Prime Minister and I would receive parliamentary allocations. They said allocations for government projects could also be distributed to my cronies. They know Im having a hard time, with my wife also having cancer, he said. Wan Saiful also claimed that charges against him would be dropped if he pledged support. He is facing money laundering and corruption charges related to the Jana Wibawa project. They contacted me repeatedly until I decided to meet them one day, he said, alleging that several meetings took place at hotels in Kuala Lumpur and Petaling Jaya. I had to entertain their requests, as they had the power and I didnt know what they could do to me, he said. Government backbenchers then interjected, saying these were malicious accusations. They added that if the accusations were true, Wan Saiful should lodge a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission. Dont hide behind immunity in the hall. Hold a press conference outside. You are making false claims, said Chong Zhemin (PH-Kampar). Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul then stepped in, saying Wan Saifuls claims were seemingly hearsay. We cannot bring this into the hall. Its always about what they' said. You cant do that, Johari said, adding that he could not verify the validity of the matter. Johari then instructed Wan Saiful to wrap up his debate so proceedings could continue. - Star, 28/2/2024 MACC: Wan Saiful given one week to report alleged bribe offer for supporting PM Anwar MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki said that under the MACC Act 2009, it is the responsibility of any individuals offered bribes to quickly report the offence so that further action can be taken. Bernamapic Monday, 04 Mar 2024 8:46 PM MYT SEREMBAN, March 4 The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is giving Tasek Gelugor MP Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan one week to lodge a report on his claim that several individuals have promised him rewards if he pledges support for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki said that under the MACC Act 2009, it is the responsibility of any individuals offered bribes to quickly report the offence so that further action can be taken. I cannot announce yet what action can be taken (if he fails to report). We are still waiting for his report; there are various possibilities (like summoning to MACC). Since he (Wan Saiful) has mentioned in the august House of Parliament about the alleged bribery (offer), he is obliged to make a report under Section 25 of the MACC Act 2009. He has to come to the MACC office; dont expect MACC to bring him to the office, he added. He told reporters this after attending the Anti-Corruption Executive Talk with Negeri Sembilan state executive councillors and state assemblymen, including Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun, here today. On the case of former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassins son-in-law Datuk Seri Muhammad Adlan Berhan, Azam said MACC had not yet discussed with the Attorney Generals Chambers the possibility of charging him in absentia.Azam had earlier said MACC was ready to charge Muhammad Adlan with criminal breach of trust but he could not be located and is believed to be still overseas. Azam also said MACC had not received any reports against the current Negeri Sembilan state Exco members and state assemblymen. Bernama, Malay Mail, 4/3/2024 Govt retracts motion to suspend Bersatu MP Wan Saiful after his open apology to Agong, PM in Parliament During his turn to debate on February 28, Wan Saiful admitted that he did utter a paragraph which said, 'Corrupt meant abuse of power'. Picture by Firdaus Latif By Soo Wern Jun Tuesday, 05 Mar 2024 1:12 PM MYT KUALA LUMPUR, March 5 The government has retracted its motion to suspend Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu) Tasek Gelugor MP Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan for six months. This followed Wan Saifuls explanation and retraction of his debate speech after he was given an opportunity by Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul to clarify and retract contents of his speech delivered last week when debating the Kings speech in the House. Before I call on the Minister of Rural and Regional Development Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi to read out the motion, I would like to call on Tasek Gelugor to give him an opportunity to state his desire so that, to me, it is better for the country. I would like to give Tasek Gelugor a last chance to state what he initially wanted to say as discussed, Johari told Parliament today. During his turn to debate on February 28, Wan Saiful admitted that he did utter a paragraph which said, Corrupt meant abuse of power. After which, there was some disturbance. But I carried on, and I said, Ampun Tuanku, that person who abuses his power, is granted an audience with Your Majesty, every week before the Cabinet meeting that, I was directing it to Tambun (Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim). I did repeat that again on February 29, when Jelutong brought it up. I would like to retract the sentence and my statement, and I would like to apologise for that statement. I would like to humbly, because in the motion, if there were mistakes I made and touched on anything relating to the King, I would like to apologise for the statement. Thank you, Speaker; I hope you are able to make a fair deliberation, Wan Saiful told Parliament during his brief explanation. Johari then proceeded to accept the Tasek Gelugor MPs apology and asked Parliament to move on from the incident. This means that Tasek Gelugor has apologised to Tambun and has retracted his statement, thats one. Secondly, Tasek Gelugor has also sought to apologise to the King. For that I will accept, minister, I take it as we can resolve this matter since an open apology has been made, I hope minister you can accept this apology as well, Johari said, while addressing Zahid in Parliament. Zahid proceeded to retract the motion that was listed as first in the matters of the Order Paper today following Question Time. I would like to retract the motion stated as number one in the order of matters for today, Zahid told Parliament. Last Wednesday, the Dewan Rakyat Speaker had given a stern warning to all MPs in the Lower House to adhere to his orders or risk being suspended for six months. He said this after repeatedly asking Wan Saiful to refrain from raising matters that were merely hearsay, but to no avail. Wan Saiful, prior to Joharis warning had claimed that he was repeatedly offered rewards in exchange for his support for the prime minister. His claims sparked a ruckus in the Lower House and he was told by the Dewan Rakyat Speaker to refrain from drawing attention to matters that were merely hearsay. This had also led Johari to warn all MPs of a six-month suspension should they disobey his orders not to bring political squabbles into the Lower House. - Malay Mail, 5/3/2024

support the party's position on different subject matters, and even what is stated in the said party's election Manifestos. Hence, after being elected MP, if the leave the said party - this is an ACT OF BETRAYAL to the people who voted for them, that is WHY THEY ARE DISQUALIFIED, and the people get another chance to choose the MP of their choice. 3) The Anti-Party Hopping law is not meant to give political parties control over their MPs - so a political party cannot THREATEN any MP to do as per what the party or leadership commands and if not, end up being disqualified. After all, the MP is the people's representative and their loyalty is FIRST to the people of their constituency. That is also WHY if a political party EXPELS a MP - he/she is NOT DISQUALIFIED, and continues as MP for their constituents. 4) However, the moment any expelled MP joins another political party, he will automatically be disqualified. 5) The BERSATU MPs, or rather the PN MPs who now have expressed support for PM Anwar Ibrahim have not left BERSATU/PN and thus is not DISQUALIFIED. 6) The Anti-Party Hopping is RIGHT > It cannot be used by political parties to control their MPs... 7) BERSATU now amended its constitution - but it is of no use, as it is definitely UNCONSTITUTIONAL .. 8) Secondly, no Party Constitution amendment is valid UNTIL the Registrar of Societies(ROS) says OK - our draconian Societies Act do not even give Societies to change their rules/Constitution by themselves. 9) In this case, the ROS would most likely reject the Constitution Amended at recent BERSATU General Meeting - WHY? Because it goes against the Federal Constitution - but then, this is Malaysia - and maybe the Home Minister will step in and grant an 'exemption'? ANOTHER ISSUE related to the Anti-Hopping laws - The said BERSATU MPs did not stand as BERSATU candidates in GE15 - but as Perikatan Nasional(PN)'s candidates, a registered political party whose members include BERSATU. So, these MPs will only be disqualified when they leave PERIKATAN Nasional ? So when and how do a MP leave PN - for that we need to look at PN's Constitution itself. Does the PN Constitution say that when a MP leaves a PN Member Party, like BERSATU - what happens to that MP? Is he still a PN MP? What is a BERSATU MP leaves BERSATU and joins PAS - he still remains a PN MP? Does PN Constitution allow for individual members? Can a MP from BERSATU leave BERSATU, and still remain a PN MP? According to the Anti-Party Hopping law in the Constitution, it is ONLY when a PN MP leaves PN that he will be disqualified... ANY MP MUST BE INDEPENDENT TO SUPPORT, ABSTAIN OR OBJECT ANY LAWS OR MATTERS RAISED IN PARLIAMENT OR OTHERWISE... POLITICAL PARTIES ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DEMAND THAT THEY ACT/VOTE AS THE PARTY ORDERS - THIS IS UNDEMOCRATIC and unconstitutional. If the constituents want end to TOL Highways, the MP must campaign and vote for the abolition of toll highways - even if the Political Party says it wants tol highways... However, in Malaysia, MPs simply do not have the freedom to represent the constituents - or make decisions, as to what the constituents want . They are many a time 'forced' to vote as the party commands - and a few MPs are BRAVE enough to even have a different view from their party leadership...And in most parties, the membership has NO SAY in the candidate, it all depends on the leadership - Where is the DEMOCRACY? That is WHY people simply have NO or little RESPECT for their MPs - they do not even lobby their MPs to push for certain positions in law or policy - as they know their MPs are just 'Party Slaves' or YES-MEN. We need more GOOD MPs who will act on their conscience and values, and not simply be obedient party members... > In that case, Hassan Karim stands out as an exceptional MP, who is brave enough even to criticize even Party President and Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim...We need MORE MPs like that - yes they may fully support party position in most things or fundamental issues - but they will also protest and speak out when something is not RIGHT... In Malaysia, if the culture 'do as my party commands' continues, is there really any need for 222 MPs to attend Parliamentary sessions - is it not enough for just party leaders/reps to be present. After all, Malaysian MPs are not free to express their own views... So, when the BERSATU 6 said they support Anwar, and presumably have confidence in Anwar being PM - there should be nothing wrong with this. Tomorrow, they may OBJECT to a law or something that the government proposes... Any POLITICAL party is just like Malaysia - where there are people that support Anwar as PM and those that do not. We see this support expressed during party elections - does a party EXPEL all who did not support the elected leader? No, we do not - we accept all, for they share common values and principles of the party > but not necessarily agree with all the things the leadership says all the time... The BERSATU six have not left BERSATU or PN >> so really there is NO NEED to change their seats in Parliament, is there. NOW, if there was THREATS, BRIBES, CORRUPTION that led them to shift the support to Anwar, then it should be a CRIME to be prosecuted. But, if they are doing so of their free will - then it is OK. Did the UNITY government bribe with offer of monies, positions in GLCs or government agencies, etc >> if YES, it must be a CRIME - PARLIAMENTARY REFORM - Votes usually taken are not even counted - it is dependent on VOLUME odd. This must change people need to know HOW exactly their MP VOTED - YES, NO or ABSTAINED > the restoration of the right to freely vote is important for the return of RESPECT to individual MPs. And the people must know how his/her MP voted > then more constituents will go lobby MPs to take a particular position on a Bill or a provision of a Bill. (Now, many see as no use, because many MPs just do as ordered by party - too afraid to take a position against party/party leadership - FEUDALISM or NEO FEUDALISM lives on, and DEMOCRACY is sidelined. See how BERSATU leadership wants to control its MPs/ADUNs - do as the leadership says, not what your constituents want - not what you fell it right ... These three provisions comprise Article 10.4, stipulating that any Bersatu members holding positions in the Dewan Rakyat or state legislative assemblies who fail to adhere to directives issued by the partys supreme council as outlined in Article 10.5 shall have their Bersatu membership terminated immediately. The additional sub-clause, Article 10.5, empowers the Bersatu supreme council to issue written directives to any or all of its Dewan Rakyat or state legislative assembly members. Do we want peoples' representative (wakil rakyat) who have no choice but follow what the leadership of their party says. Should not MPs represent the people of their constituency, or be FREE to act according to his/her values and principles, after considering party position???? BERSATU amending its constitution is useless, as I believe all of them contested Perikatan Nasional MPs - so, what does the PN Constitution say about expelling MPs? WHAT CAN THE CONSTITUENTS DO TO REMOVE MPs THAT THEY HAVE LOSS CONFIDENCE ON? Time Malaysia considers putting up a LAW on this > If the constituents have loss confidence in their MP, then they must submit a PETITION that is signed by more than 50% of the constituents that had the right to vote in the elections that elected the said MP - The petition must contain name and NRIC. If the number is achieved, the said MP is forthwith DISQUALIFIED and a by-elections will be held. [Of course, the disqualified MP is allow to contest in the by-elections] So, if that law to RECALL MP exist in Malaysia - power is returned to the PEOPLE to remove any MP >> so if they are UNHAPPY with the 6 BERSATU MPs to the extend that they have loss confidence in them to continue representing them in Parliament - then they can be removed... Maybe PN should push for such a law - maybe PH-led coalition will put such a law in place.... How interesting that UMNO-BN is already preparing for by-elections -.. .. Bersatu amending constitution to scare MPs from backing Anwar, says Dr Zulkafperi Tanjung Karang MP Dr Zulkafperi Hanapi, who is one of six Bersatu MPs supporting the government, says he is unfazed by the partys plans. Amirul Aiman - 26 Feb 2024, 7:49am Dr Zulkafperi Hanapi said ultimately, the Registrar of Societies will decide whether the amendments to Bersatus constitution are approved. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA: A Bersatu MP who now supports Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim says the partys decision to amend its constitution is meant to intimidate other elected representatives from switching allegiance. Tanjong Karang MP Dr Zulkafperi Hanapi said the party seems to be reacting to claims that more Bersatu MPs would be declaring their support for the prime minister and the unity government. What Bersatu is attempting to do (by amending its constitution) is to pressure those who are considering changing their support and prevent it from happening, he said at a press conference last night. However, Zulkafperi said he was unfazed by the partys decision as the constitutional changes would not apply to him and his five Bersatu colleagues who now support Anwar. "I dont believe its binding, but well leave it to our lawyers to handle. According to the constitution, any changes should ideally be forward-looking. Retrospective changes would not be binding, he said, adding that ultimately, the Registrar of Societies will decide whether the amendments are approved. On Jan 29, Bersatu secretary-general Hamzah Zainudin announced that the partys Supreme Council agreed to amend Article 10 of the partys constitution to keep its elected representatives in line. This comes after six Bersatu MPs declared support for Anwar without leaving the party in order to circumvent the anti-hopping law. Hamzah said they have also agreed to pursue legal action against elected representatives who betray the party, with the aim of vacating their seats and that the party is prepared to face by-elections. Apart from Zulkafperi, the other five MPs are Iskandar Dzulkarnain Abdul Khalid (Kuala Kangsar), Suhaili Abdul Rahman (Labuan), Azizi Abu Naim (Gua Musang), Zahari Kechik (Jeli) and Syed Abu Hussin Hafiz Syed Abdul Fasal (Bukit Gantang). All six MPs justified their support for the federal government by citing the needs of their constituencies. However, they said they would remain loyal to Bersatu. Last month, Syed Hussin claimed that up to eight more MPs were expected to declare their support for the unity government. - FMT, 26/2/2024 Will Bersatu's controversial constitutional amendments bring good or have potential ramifications? By WAN AHMAD ATARMIZI 04 Mar 2024 01:32pm Muhyiddin (sitting, centre) at a press conference after the Bersatu's Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) at the Ideal Convention Centre Selayang on Saturday. In a signification move aimed at addressing internal rifts and asserting party discipline, Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu) recently convened an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) on March 2, to enact crucial amendments to its constitution. This EGM, held amidst heightened political tensions, sought to close existing loopholes and define clearer guidelines for party members, especially elected representatives, to uphold party loyalty and integrity. Closing the 'Loophole' During the EGM, which saw the participation of approximately 1,000 party delegates from across the nation, Bersatu approved amendments to its constitution aimed at addressing recent challenges concerning party defections and support for rival political figures. Notably, the amendments were devised to close a perceived loophole that allowed six Bersatu Members of Parliament (MPs) to express support for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim without forfeiting their party membership. Bersatus Supreme Council Member, Datuk Wan Saiful Wan Jan had emphasised the importance of these amendments in preserving party unity and discipline. He highlighted the unanimous approval of the amendments by Bersatu's delegates during the EGM, signalling the party's firm stance against disloyalty and betrayal. The amendments introduced at the EGM included the addition of three sub-clauses to Bersatu's constitution. These three provisions comprise Article 10.4, stipulating that any Bersatu members holding positions in the Dewan Rakyat or state legislative assemblies who fail to adhere to directives issued by the partys supreme council as outlined in Article 10.5 shall have their Bersatu membership terminated immediately. The additional sub-clause, Article 10.5, empowers the Bersatu supreme council to issue written directives to any or all of its Dewan Rakyat or state legislative assembly members. The third sub-clause, adopted by Bersatu delegates during the EGM, pertains to Article 10.4 and mandates the secretary-general, under the directive of the supreme council, to formally notify the affected member of their immediate termination of membership and removal from Bersatus party registry system. These sub-clauses, crafted to address the specific concerns raised by recent events, would empower the party's supreme council to take decisive action against members who deviate from party directives. Implications of the Amendments Additionally, Bersatu President Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin elaborated on the implications of these amendments, highlighting their alignment with the Federal Constitution's provisions and their potential invocation of the anti-hopping law. Muhyiddin emphasised that the amendments would lead to the automatic cessation of membership for MPs or state legislative members who act contrary to the party's policies, thereby triggering the vacancy of their seats. Following the endorsement of these revisions during Bersatu's EGM, Muhyiddin said the party would seek approval from the Registrar of Societies (RoS) for the amended constitution. Once the RoS sanctions the modifications, Bersatu will promptly implement these regulations. Bersatu Secretary-General Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin will then correspond with all six Bersatu members, seeking verification of their support for Anwar. If they affirm their support, the constitutional provisions mandating the vacation of their seats will be enforced. Crucially, Bersatu's constitutional amendments are poised to redefine the consequences for party defections and disloyalty, marking a significant departure from previous disciplinary measures. These amendments aim to bolster the party's internal cohesion and resilience amid evolving political dynamics, ensuring that party members uphold their allegiance and accountability. The six MPs who went rogue since last year are Zahari Kechik (Jeli), Iskandar Dzulkarnain Abdul Khalid (Kuala Kangsar), Syed Abu Hussin Hafiz Syed Abdul Fasal (Bukit Gantang), Suhaili Abdul Rahman (Labuan), Mohd Azizi Abu Naim (Gua Musang) and Tanjong Karang MP Datuk Dr Zulkafperi Hanapi. Potential Ramifications However, concerns have been raised regarding the retroactive application of these measures amidst the fervour surrounding Bersatu's EGM and its consequential amendments. Bersatu Women's Wing Deputy Chief Datuk Mas Ermieyati Samsudin cautioned against the retroactive implementation of the amendments, advocating for fairness and adherence to legal principles. As Bersatu awaits the RoSs approval for the constitutional amendments, the party braces for potential ramifications, including the possibility of vacant parliamentary seats and subsequent by-elections. The outcome of these developments remains pivotal, shaping Bersatu's trajectory and influence within Malaysia's political landscape. - Sinar Daily, 4/3/2024 BN ready to field candidates if six Bersatu seats declared vacant, says Zahid Nation Sunday, 03 Mar 2024 5:31 PM MYT BAGAN DATUK: Barisan Nasional is prepared to contest six parliamentary seats currently held by Bersatu if they are declared vacant, says Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi (pic) . The coalition chairman and Umno president said these seats used to be Barisan's. "We will discuss with the unity government leadership to decide on this if the vacancies occur," he told reporters after attending the Northern Corridor Economic Region (NCER) mini showcase programme here on Sunday (March 3). He said Umno and Barisan candidates should be given priority to contest in these constituencies. However, he said that Parliamentary regulations and the Federal Constitution do not provide for the Bersatu MPs concerned to be stripped of their seats despite efforts by Bersatu. He said Bersatu seemed to be having a taste of its own medicine as one of its leaders had previously taken Umno MPs into Bersatu. This follows an amendment to Article 10 of the Bersatu Constitution, as approved at a special party general meeting, to immediate strip the membership of any elected representative who pledges support that contradicts Bersatu's directive or stand. Bersatu president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said the party would send a report on the amendment to the Registrar of Societies (ROS) and it would be enforced with immediate effect if approved. The six Bersatu MPs who have expressed support for the Prime Minister are Datuk Syed Abu Hussin Hafiz Syed Abdul Fasal (Bukit Gantang), Mohd Azizi Abu Naim (Gua Musang), Datuk Zulkafperi Hanapi (Tanjong Karang), Zahari Kechik (Jeli), Datuk Iskandar Dzulkarnain Abdul Khalid (Kuala Kangsar) and Datuk Suhaili Abdul Rahman (Labuan). Bernama - Star, 3/3/2024

have received a phone call in which he was threatened and warned that he had to express support for the prime minister. Due to the nature of the threat received, he said he agreed to meet, followed up by many other meetings, all at hotels across Kuala Lumpur. The first was on Jan 17 at the Westin Hotel, followed by another at the JW Marriot Hotel, with one also scheduled for the end of February at the Corus Hotel. He claimed that one of those he met was a friend, whom he refused to name. However, the other men who approached him had used fake names which they appeared to forget, or got wrong, when addressing one another. There are many disturbing aspects to these allegations. Bribery is a serious crime. Why didnt Wan Saiful lodge a report with the police or the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission? At the very least, there could have been a sting operation to catch the perpetrators red-handed. However, it appears more likely he does not have evidence to back his allegations, and only wanted to make the government look bad, by deciding to tell his little secret in the Dewan Rakyat, where he knows he has immunity as an MP and need not provide any evidence or details. Had he made this revelation outside Parliament, that someone had offered him money to support the prime minister, he may have found a charge of defamation lodged against him. Who else would want to offer him money to support Anwar, but someone from the PKR presidents camp? Others may also argue, that perhaps it could have been a third party which wanted to make Anwar look bad, If he had evidence of an attempt at bribery, he needs to report it and have his claims challenged in court. Perhaps, the real purpose of this expose was to sow the seeds of uncertainty and confusion among the supporters of the unity government. The other disturbing aspect of Wan Saifuls behaviour is how he casually revealed that he had no choice but to entertain the meet-ups because they have the power and that if he did not accede to their request, something unexpected beyond (his) control might happen. In claiming he fears for his safety, he seems to be making out that the people are probably thugs. Propaganda game... Wan Saiful is only playing a propaganda game. When censured by the Speaker and asked to retract the remarks, Wan Saiful easily complied. This was not a sign of compliance or humility on his part. Wan Saiful willingly withdrew his allegations because he knew that the damage had already been done. It would be widely reported that the bribe had been offered in exchange for his support for the PM. This was the message he wanted to come out of Parliament. However, it is puzzling why the Speaker did not come down hard on him. Wan Saiful had made a personal attack and hed done so without substance or evidence. It is about time those who made personal attacks are punished so that they can be made an example. This may deter other recalcitrant MPs from repeating wild unsubstantiated claims in Parliament. Wan Saiful should have been suspended from the Dewan Rakyat for six months and his allowance for that period withdrawn. The other puzzle is the offer of a mere RM1.7 million for Wan Saifuls constituency area. It seems a pittance and doesnt make sense. In the five years before the next election, he would receive only RM340,000 per year to spend on his constituency. It does not seem a huge amount although to be fair, any extra money to be spent on his constituency will come in handy. When the MP for Jelutong, Pakatan Harapans RSN Rayer, urged Wan Saiful to lodge a report with the MACC, he said that he had all the records and warned Rayer not to test him or he would reveal the people, one by one. At this point, either Rayer or the Speaker should have called his bluff. The MPs were in the midst of the debate on the royal address when Wan Saiful dropped his expose. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong, in opening Parliament, had advised MPs to behave and have a code of conduct and some decency. Was Wan Saiful disrespectful of the Agongs express wish for MPs to behave? The Agong had also stated his desire for the nation to have political stability but the seeds of confusion sowed by Wan Saiful does have the potential to cause the rakyat to lose confidence in the government. When the ringgit is struggling, and our economy could do with a boost, it appears that the PN politicians just want to play politics. - Mariam Mokhtar What is SST? SST refers to Sales and Service Tax. The sales tax is only levied on the level of the producer or manufacturer, while the service tax is imposed on all customers who use tax services. The SST rates are less transparent than the standard 6% GST, the SST rates vary between 6 and 10%. What is GST? GST is a multi-level tax system for most businesses and industries, including manufacturers, distributors, retailers and consumers. GST covers a wide range of targets, from manufacturers selling products to dealers, reselling them to retailers, and then reselling them to consumers at every stage. GST comprises all businesses, retailers and trades. The sales tax covers only manufacturers whereas the service tax covers certain prescribed services such as professional services. The suppliers are allowed to claim back the governments GST, but the government does not immediately refund the GST claims, which creates problems for the cash flow of the companies. While SST is a single tax system, only the service industry and manufacturers need to pay SST when selling products to dealers. SST has only one phase to pay taxes, compared with every phase of GST. Demi nak tunjuk SST menyusahkan rakyat, ada yang senaraikan perkhidmatan yang dikenakan SST. Contohnya tiket kapal terbang, repair telefon bimbit dan lain-lain lain.Macam aku tulis sebelum ni, memanglah akan ada pertambahan belanja. Kalau tak ada, bukanlah kenaikan cukai namanya. Ceritanya sekarang, impak minimum pada rakyat.Tiket kapal terbang, perbaiki telefon, servis kereta, semua buat tiap2 hari ke? Yang penting, perkara yang diperlukan setiap hari tu tak naik. Kalau naik tapi setahun sekali, kesannya minimum. Yang naik kapal terbang tiap hari tu cuma golongan kayangan. Sibuk nak bela kayangan ni dah kenapa? Dapat elaun ke?Nak bandingkan, masa GST dulu, makan kat mamak pun kena. Sekarang perkhidmatan F tak naik. Takkan rendah sangat IQ tu sampai perkara macam tu pun nak kena beritahu?Sebenarnya aku malas dah nak ulas pasal SST ni. Sebab semua komen berbentuk presumptive. Tak nampak lagi kesan sebenar. Memang ada yang cerita barang naik tapi tak logik. Bayangkan, naik SST tu cuma 2%. Tiba-tiba harga barang naik dekat 100%. Mintak resit tak mau beri pulak tu. Bukti tak ada bermakna menipu. Boleh jadi fitnah kalau begitu. Eh logik la sikit. Bagi la bukti. Tapi ada juga yang percaya. Siap tag aku suruh baca. Aku dah baca tapi tak ulas sebab bagi aku adalah terlalu bodoh kalau percaya cerita dia. Biar je walau meroyan. Lepas sebulan, keadaan akan tenang sebab orang baru perasan cerita yang tersebar tu lebih kepada nak cipta sentimen. Bukan cerita sebenar pun. Lebih baik highlight kerajaan turunkan defisit serta kurangkan pertumbuhan hutang. Ia tak pernah dibuat oleh mana2 PM termasuklah Mahathir, selepas DS Anwar dipecat. Walaun2 marah bila Jackpot kena SST 8% kot, sabarlah walaun,t ak sampai seposen takkan itu pun nak berkira... Kita tak usah layan royanan walaun dan walajib soal SST ni. Untuk layan kanak-kanak, kena turunkan IQ setaraf kanak-kanak. Begitu juga melayan orang bodoh dan orang gila. Biarkan walau terus meroyan. IQ kita tak serendah mereka. Baik tumpukan soal Hadi dan pemimpin PAS yang lain menderhaka kepada Sultan. Itu lebih bermakna. - Raja Gelap II Story seterusnya... 15 babies have died at Kamal Adwan Hospital due to the lack of food, fuel and medicine. Two baby twins from Rafah targeted and killed by the Israeli occupation. One child killed and multiple injured in an Israeli airstrike on the Abu-Ghali family home in Bina refugee camp, Rafah 2 brothers Amr and Muhammad Al Farra were tragically murdered by an Israeli sniper as they were inspecting their home in Khan-Younis.They were left to bleed out with nobody able to help them until they died. cheers.

Independent Police Conduct Commission Act 2022 , and an immediate STOP in the process of appointing Commissioners, officers and setting up structures which is costing government monies. The IPCC was not what was intended when that said 2004 Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police, led by former chief justice Mohamed Dzaiddin Abdullah, that recommended Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC). One must remember that the then Royal Commission (RC) made the recommendation for an IPCMC despite the fact that there already existed the Police Force Commission that had the power under Article 140(1) of the Federal Constitution to exercise disciplinary control, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), police or other relevant authorities to deal with reports of crime committed by police officers . This implies that the existing mechanisms that were meant to deal with crime or misconduct committed by police officers had failed or was found lacking thus the need for an INDEPENDENT IPCMC, that is placed under direct Parliament authority, The weakness of the IPCC Act is many, as the IPCC now ends up being a sorting body required to refer complaints it received back to the Police Force Commission , the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), police or other relevant authorities . What is the use of simply sorting complaints and referring it back to very same institutions, that also existed at the time the Royal Commission, made the recommendation for the setting up of the IPCMC. In fact, the new IPCMC when it comes to be, after this present IPCC is done away with, should also be tasked with the monitoring of the Police Force Commission and other relevant bodies that are meant to act on crimes or misconducts allegedly committed by the police. In most cases, the relevant authorities dealing with crimes committed by the police will still be the police again. What do we do when the police decide not to investigate, decide no further action or investigations (NFA) is needed or decide to not proceed to charge and try in court their fellow police officers that have allegedly committed crimes, or even subsequently decide to discontinue criminal trials? Shocking that Minister puts into force law opposed when it was tabled by the then PN-BN coalition government, that replaced the PH tabled IPCMC Bill, which was being improved? The fact must be noted that even when the IPCC Bill was being debated in Parliament, the Pakatan Harapan and other Opposition MPs were generally strongly against it. So, why did the Minister put it into force after GE15, ignoring the sentiments and position of PH and the people about this bad law? MADPET is most disappointed with Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and his Pakatan Harapan led coalition government, who vide Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, put into force the Independent Police Conduct Commission Act 2022 on 1 July 2023 [PU(B) 574/2022]. It is true that this law had been passed by Parliament, obtained royal assent on 8 October 2022, and was gazette on 18 October 2022, but NO law comes into force or operation until the Minister does so . What should have rightly be done, was to send this IPCC law back to Parliament to be repealed or amended so that Malaysia will finally have a truly Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC ), as recommended by the Royal Commission of Inquiry about 19 years ago, or even the IPCMC Bill tabled by the then PH government in 2019 after incorporating the recommendation of the Parliamentary Select Committee and others to remedy matters lacking. IPCC Commissioners appointed found wanting In January 2024, the Home Minister announced the appointment of a former director-general of the Prime Ministers Department s Implementation Coordination the new IPCC chairman, that a former Prime Ministers Department advisory board chairman will be Deputy, and the other 3 are a former National Audit Departments financial sector director, a former police s logistics and technology department deputy director and a former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission special operations division senior director. Will they be truly independent and not simply yes men to the government of the day? They came from a past in the PMs Department, Finance Ministry, police and MACC and what did they do, if and when they became aware of the 1MDB or SRC scandal? MADPET believes that no former police or MACC officer should be in the Commission, and neither should there be anyone with a past in the Prime Ministers Department. All intended Commissioners should all be vetted by Parliament before appointment, and they should be former judges, lawyers, former prosecutors, and those with no past in government services especially the police. SUHAKAM was perceived as a toothless tiger until the appointment of Hasmy Agam as Chairman on in 2010, and thereafter Razali Ismail, who then saw SUHAKAM becoming a real Human Rights Commission thus, the effectiveness of any Commission depends on the independence and bravery of the Commissioners appointed who is brave enough to act independently without fear or favour - not even worried whether their action/s will displease the Prime Minister or government of the day, or affect their reappointment for another 3 year term. Shortcomings of the Police Force Commission A fundamental problem today is that the public lose of faith in the system when it comes to dealing with bad cops. Lodging reports and complaints against police and law enforcement is useless, as most of the time nothing much seems to happen. Lets consider the Police Force Commission , who is duty bound by Article 146(1) of the Federal Constitution to submit annual reports to Parliament but where do we find it? Does it even contain details of crime/misconduct alleged and/or confirmed, penalties imposed and the name of the said officer all of which are very important to assure that their complaints are not ignored, and it will also serve as a DETTERENT to other officers, who will know what crime/misconduct that they must certainly not commit? What police cannot do Be transparent about IGPs Standing Orders and other regulations What are the things that police cannot do? Besides the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 and few offences stated in certain laws, police are also bound to follow the Inspector Generals Standing Orders (Section 97 Police Act 1967), but the problem is that it is difficult for the public to know what it contains, hence making it almost impossible for the members of the public to even lodge complaints about a police officers non-compliance with Regulations and Standing Orders of the Inspector General of the Police (IGP). The government must ensure that all regulations and Standing Orders are made available to the Public, initially in police and Home Ministrys website, which will then enable the public to actively be able to highlight any non-compliances. Sadly, the coming into force of IPCC Act ends capacity of EAIC to deal with complaints about police. Another sad consequence, of the putting in force of the Independent Police Conduct Commission Act 2022, was that misconduct or complaints against members of the police force can no longer be dealt by the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC ). One must appreciate that the EAIC did well in the inquiries of death in police custody like in the case S.Balamurugan, Soh Kai Chiok, Syed Mohd Azlan, N.Dharmendran and James Ramesh, whereby the Investigation Reports are available in the EAICs website. Some of the findings of the EAIC against the police was indeed BRAVE, for they found police wrongdoings in causing the death and also tampering/destroying evidence. Based on its past annual reports, the complaint received against the police was the highest 2020(699), 2021(742) and 2022(500). Now, the problem is what happens to complaints concerning police officers? Despite EAIC recommendations, for criminal action to be taken, sadly almost none was taken. That is the reason, that besides investigative powers, such Commissions like the EAIC, Malaysian Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM) and hopefully the REAL IPCMC when it comes to be must be also given prosecution powers for crimes committed by the police, and NOT just crimes under the IPCC (or later IPCMC Act The IPCMC must be able to hold PUBLIC Inquiries and PROSECUTE At present, this Independent Police Conduct Commission, besides sorting and sending complaints to other bodies, seems to not even have the ability to have any PUBLIC INQUIRY for the complaints against police. The other problem that arises is what happens after the complaints are referred to the Police Force Commission, MACC or the police to take action? What if nothing happens should not the REAL IPCMC, when it comes into being, then have the power to prosecute themselves for crimes that police commits? Minister, S top pussyfooting when it comes to the Police The Malaysian police have been implicated in many possible non-compliance of law including death in police custody, torture and even extrajudicial killings. When will the all the police officers on duty be wearing body-cams with recording capacity? When will CCTVs be installed in police lock-ups, and every other room that the police deal with suspects? Such measures have long needed to protect suspects rights importantly ensure that the Malaysian police act professionally in accordance with the law. The Malaysian government must bravely remove and/or prosecute bad cops, and do what is needed to restore the public image of the Malaysian police. One wonders at times as to why the government seems afraid of the police? Could it be that the police hold swords of Damocles over their head, placing them Ministers or even MPs in a situation in where something very bad could happen to them at any time if the police is offended? Could it be revelation of evidence of crimes committed? After all, it has been proven true that Prime Ministers and members of the Cabinet have in the past committed crimes, including abuse of power and corruption. We need a CLEAN corrupt-free and efficient police force in Malaysia, and MADPET calls for the REPEAL of Independent Police Conduct Commission Act 2022, and an enactment of a new truly Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC). MADPET calls also for an immediate removal of Commissioners said to be appointed to save government monies. Commissioners of the real IPCMC must be vetted by Parliament, and should be truly Independent. Charles Hector For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) Press Release IPCC Lacks the Authority to Uphold Police Accountability 22 Dec 2022 4:56 pm The Malaysian Bar refers to the recent announcement made by the Minister of Home Affairs, Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, where he stated that the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) Act which was passed in the Dewan Rakyat earlier this year would come into force in June 2023. 1 We are disheartened by the Governments plan to forge ahead with the Act, especially when the Malaysian Bar has consistently expressed grave concerns relating to the shortcomings of the IPCC Act. Over the past many years, Malaysians have been barraged with the disturbing phenomenon of deaths in police custody. As a nation, we are deeply dismayed by the unabated spate of deaths that appear to have no end in sight. The police exercise a wide array of powers ranging from the right to arrest; the right to use force, seize property, and to search private premises; just to name a few. These are all draconian measures that must be justified, and they demand a high standard of integrity and competence from those executing them. The public has a right to expect that the police will act with utmost fairness when dealing with the community they serve. It is therefore only right that there should be an independent oversight body to preside over one of our countrys most important public services the police force. The Malaysian Bar has always been a vocal advocate for the establishment of an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC). The most salient feature of the IPCMC is that it is provided with disciplinary authority over the police. It goes without saying that the police cannot police themselves. The IPCMC guarantees accountability because it provides the necessary enforcement powers to reprimand and punish errant officers if they break the law. The IPCMC will provide the police with the dignity and respect it rightly deserves by addressing the misconduct committed by a few of its members, which brings disrepute to the rest of the hardworking men and women in blue who are committed to serving our nation and its people. It should also be noted that prior to 2020, the Government of the day in 2018 had tabled the IPCMC Bill, only for it to be replaced with the IPCC by the Government that took over after the so-called Sheraton Move. 2 It has always been our view that the IPCC in its current form fails to live up to our expectations of a more transparent and better regulated police force. First of all, the Commissioners of the IPCC ("the Commission) are appointed by the King on the advice of the Prime Minister. The Chief Executive Officer of the Commission is appointed by the Minister of Home Affairs, which further undermines any form of independence or impartiality in this oversight mechanism, leading it to become further entwined with the Executive. Secondly, the Commission may conduct visits to any place and premises, such as police stations, lock-ups and detention centres, but they will have to provide early notice. This will render such visits ineffective as it will give time to the authorities that they are visiting, the time to make arrangements in advance and that may not be reflective of the actual situation at the premises. Thirdly, the Commission under the IPCC does not bar the appointment of former police officers or current government officials to the Commission, therefore further blurring the line between the Executive and the Commission. One of the main differences between the IPCMC and the IPCC is that under the IPCC, the Commission cannot act against police officers who have committed wrongdoing, but can only recommend proposed action to the Police Force Commission or other relevant authorities. It is a toothless piece of legislation that does not effectively achieve the intended objective. Good policing is fair, just, and effective. It requires trust by the public in an institution that is mandated to serve and protect us. This can be done through establishing a system of civilian oversight, which is exhibited in the IPCMC Bill, but not in the IPCC Act. External scrutiny is a hallmark of any democratic police force and one that is accountable, transparent, and responsive to the needs of the public. The Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police in its Report (2005) stated that: When officers act in contravention of laws and regulations without fear of investigation or reprimand, the culture of impunity begins to develop. Each wrongdoing that is not investigated or punished or is supported by higher ranks within the police leadership leads to the perception that such misconduct is permissible The IPCC Act is a step backward in regard to creating a police force that operates effectively and transparently. Instead, the IPCC Act is one that entrenches impunity and turns a blind eye to the very real problems that the institution faces. Our newly minted Government that has repeatedly emphasised the importance of good governance should reconsider its position in allowing the IPCC Act to be brought into force. The police wield great amounts of power, and therefore it is only logical that a proportionate amount of responsibility and accountability must follow correspondingly. The Malaysian Bar therefore calls upon the Government to substantially amend the IPCC Act to incorporate the necessary provisions as those found in the IPCMC Bill to bring about police accountability, including granting disciplinary powers to the IPCC,before implementing the IPCC Act. Karen Cheah Yee Lynn President Malaysian Bar 22 December 2022 1 IPCC to comes in force June next year , New Straits Times , 13 December 2022. 2 IPCC Act to be in force June 2023, says home minister , Malay Mail , 13 December 2022. Source: Malaysian Bar Website IPCC to get its members soon, says Home Minister By MAZWIN NIK ANIS Nation Thursday, 12 Oct 2023 1:13 PM MYT PUTRAJAYA: The newly enforced Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) will get its members soon, says Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. He said the process of selecting the seven members for the commission, including its head, is underway. The (selection) process has already started. We will use these coming months to complete it, he said when met after attending the ministrys monthly gathering on Thursday (Oct 12). The IPCC was enforced in July. Last year, the Dewan Rakyat passed the IPCC Bill after being in Parliaments Order Paper over the past two years. It replaced the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) Bill, which the Pakatan Harapan administration tabled on July 18, 2019. The independent commissions role is to monitor the integrity of the police force and probe complaints of misconduct involving police personnel. On another matter, Saifuddin said the top of the ministrys Budget 2024 wishlist was to set up temporary shelters to house children detained by the Immigration Department during operations against illegals. Such a centre is already in operation in Nilai, known as Baitul Mahabbah. There are 19 Immigration depots nationwide housing 12,000 detainees, of which 1,400 are children. During my recent visit to the United States, this effort has been praised by the US authorities and UN bodies," he said. The Prime Minister has also asked for this (opening of centres) to be a priority for the ministry, he said, adding that the estimated cost to open the three shelters is RM10mill. - Star, 12/10/2023 Five appointed to IPCC Nation Thursday, 11 Jan 2024 PUTRAJAYA: Five new appointees have been named into the seven-member Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC), says Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. The former director-general of the Prime Ministers Departments Implementation Coordination Unit, Datuk Zolkopli Dahalan, had been appointed as the new IPCC chairman, he said. As for the IPCC deputy chairman, he said that former Prime Ministers Department advisory board chairman Datuk Mohamad Jazamuddin Ahmad Nawawi had been given the role. He also said former National Audit Departments financial sector director Martina@Kartina Zamhari was now a member of the IPCC. Other appointees into the IPCC, said Saifuddin Nasution, were former polices logistics and technology department deputy director (operations/technical) Datuk Shukri Abdullah and also former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission special operations division senior director Datuk Tan Kang Sai. As for the remaining two members, he said it would be filled when the time comes. Saifuddin Nasution said the IPCC would act as an independent body to monitor the integrity of the police force and probe complaints of misconduct. The IPCC Act also places the role of the IPCC as a mandatory referral that obliges the police to refer cases involving sexual crimes, or deaths in custody (to the commission), he told a press conference at the Home Ministry yesterday. The IPCC Bill was passed in Parliament last year, replacing the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission Bill tabled in 2019 by the previous government. - Star, 11/1/2024 EAIC to stop accepting complaints against police personnel starting July 1 The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission says this is in line with the Independent Police Conduct Commission Act 2022 which comes into force tomorrow. Bernama June 30, 2023 12:17 PM 1 minute read The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission says it will not accept complaints against PDRM or its officers from July 1 onwards. Photo: Bernama Starting tomorrow, the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) will no longer accept any complaints against the police or its officers. This is because the police are no longer listed under the schedule of the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Act 2009 (Act 700) as one of the enforcement agencies under the EAIC's purview, it said in a statement today. The EAIC said this was in line with the Independent Police Conduct Commission Act 2022 [Act 839] (IPCC) which will also come into force from July 1. "The EAIC, however, will resolve all complaints and investigations received before July 1, 2023, within a period of one year until July 1, 2024, in accordance with Section 47 of Act 839. Any enquiries or complaints by the public against the police from July 1, 2023, can be channelled through the security division of the home affairs ministry at 03-8886 8526 or 03-8886 8529," the statement read. It also said that the EAIC remains committed to its vision as a leader in the enforcement, transformation and culture of integrity based on professionalism and best practices. The public can visit www.eaic.gov.my for more information related to the EAIC. - Malaysia Now, 30/6/2023 Independent Police Conduct Commission needs more transparency, says civil society By Benjamin Lee Nation Monday, 22 Jan 2024 3:23 PM MYT PETALING JAYA: Civil society organisations (CSO) are calling for increased transparency and accountability to be implemented in the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) to prevent further depletion of public trust in police forces. In a joint press conference organized bySuara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) today, 57 CSOs aired their concerns over the sudden announced setup of the proposed seven-member IPCC on Jan 10. Suaram coordinator Wong Yan Ke said the inherent structural deficiencies within the IPCC could render the oversight mechanism to be a "toothless tiger" regardless of the competence of its members. This included the IPCCs inability to conduct searches and seizures or make unannounced visits to police lock-ups or take direct disciplinary action themselves against offending police officers. "The Commissions jurisdiction being purely limited to providing recommendations to the Police Force Commission for subsequent action is a severe limitation seeing as they could be ignored. "This may worsen the already rising trust deficit between the public and law enforcement due to the recent spike in severe cases of police misconduct. "This could cause people to be less willing to cooperate with officers in the future, which will in turn make it significantly harder for the police to do their duties," he said. Previously on Jan 16, Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Razarudin Husain said that 2% of the police force had been found to have committed wrongdoings in 2023 which amounts to over 2,740 cases of rogue police officers out of an overall 137,000-strong police force. He added the IPCC must address the lack of up-to-date data transparency on cases of police misconduct through releasing frequent updates on the police misconduct cases and statistics. "The IPCC must be made to publicly release misconduct data on a frequent basis instead of needing CSOs like us to pressure them to disclose data through other channels like asked questions in Parliament. "This will help to instil public confidence back in the law enforcement knowing that their complaints and concerns are being heard," he said. He also called on the government to set up additional IPCC offices in other states to ensure that all communities, especially the marginalised rural communities like those Sabah and Sarawak, were served equally. Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) media monitoring and action program officer Dineshwara Naidu also lamented the lack of transparency so far over the selection process for the current five IPCC members. "The government must make it clear on how potential IPCC members are or have been chosen and what criteria they must meet as well as who or which department is in charge of this vital process. "They must also be clear on who will be held accountable should any issues arise from the members," he said. Other notable CSOs who voiced similar concerns during the press conference included representatives from Coalition for Clean & Fair Election (Bersih), Amnesty International Malaysia and many others. - Star, 22/1/2024 A slew of high-profile accusations puts Malaysias new Independent Police Conduct Commission under scrutiny With the five new members, the watchdog can immediately start to address complaints against officers. But ultimate power over disciplinary action remains with the police. Police officers in riot gear march during the National Day parade in Putrajaya, Malaysia on Aug 31, 2023. (Photo: AP/Vincent Thian) Rhea Yasmine Alis Haizan 17 Jan 2024 03:58PM (Updated: 17 Jan 2024 05:38PM) SINGAPORE: A latest slew of scandals involving the Malaysian police, including allegations against one for raping a foreign student, has cast the spotlight on the membership of an independent body tasked to probe complaints against the men in blue, but even that has come under fire. On Jan 10, Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail revealed the names of five members appointed to the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC), with two spots yet to be filled. According to Free Malaysia Today (FMT), Mr Saifuddin said that the IPCC has the prerogative to kickstart an investigation in the public interest without referring to any party or report. But analysts and activists are already describing the body as toothless, given its limited powers. The IPCC has no disciplinary power over police officers who are found to have committed (an act of) misconduct, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) law expert Dr Nik Ahmad Kamal Nik Mahmood told CNA. Dr Nik Ahmad explained that the IPCC can only provide punishment recommendations to the police force commission, adding that it is ultimately up to the police disciplinary committee to determine and undertake action. Malaysian lawyer Edmund Bon agreed that the IPCC wields very limited power. It is in essence more of a referral commission, said Mr Bon, noting that the previously proposed Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) had more powers and a direct enforcement mandate. The IPCMC came about after many years of consultation and problems that we see with the police force. But the police force objected to it (because they didn't want to be policed) and therefore you have a watered-down version of it (through the IPCC). So police accountability will still be quite low because you don't have a strong police commission or force, something like Hong Kong or other countries, he told CNA. - CNA, 17/1/2024 Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) Act 2020 should be amended to bring about police accountability Hakam Saturday, 01 Jul 2023 1:35 PM MYT JULY 1 The Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) comes into force on July 1, 2023. There are serious flaws in the IPCC that needs to be addressed to bring about Police Accountability in Malaysia. Several key provisions as stated in the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) Bill 2005 drafted by the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysian Police (Royal Commission) and the IPCMC Bill 2019 have been omitted from the IPCC Act 2020. The recommendations by the Parliament Select Committee on matters pertaining to the IPCMC Bill 2019 have also not been fully incorporated into the IPCC Act 2020. The Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) comes into force on July 1, 2023. Picture by Mukhriz Hazim The key areas that need to be incorporated into the IPCC Act 2020 include inter-alia the following: 1. Reinstatement of Disciplinary Authority to IPCC The IPCMC Bill 2005 and the IPCMC Bill 2019 vested Disciplinary Authority with the Commission. The IPCC Act 2020 does not have disciplinary authority and any findings of misconduct with the relevant recommendations has to be referred to the Police Force Commission. It is imperative for the IPCC to be vested with disciplinary authority to ensure Police Accountability. 2. Scope of Misconduct has been restricted The IPCC Act 2020 states that any misconduct regulated under Section 96 and Section 97 of the Police Act 1967 falls outside the purview of the IPCC. The Inspector Generals Standing Orders (IGSOs) made pursuant to Section 97 of the Police Act 1967 prescribes more than 100 minor and major misconducts. There would be very little for the IPCC to investigate; as most of the misconducts would be within the purview of the IGSOs. Therefore, the prohibition against investigating misconducts regulated under Sections 96 and 97 of the Police Act should be removed for the IPCC to ensure Police Accountability. 3. Powers of the IPCC The IPCC Act 2020 does not incorporate search and investigation powers as provided in the IPCMC 2005 Bill. The search and investigation powers provided to the Enforcement Agencies Integrity Commission (EAIC) are also not given to the IPCC under the IPCC Act 2020. The IPCC should be vested with the requisite search and investigation powers to function effectively. 4. Independence and supervision of IPCC The appointment and removal of the Commissioners should be vested in the relevant Parliamentary Select Committee, instead of the prime minister. The IPCC should not be under the Ministry of the Home Affairs. 5. Issues pertaining to sensitive information and documents classified as official secrets documents prejudicial to national security or national interest The classification of sensitive information should not be in the hands of heads of department; but should be placed in the hands of IGP or Deputy IGP. Matters pertaining to official secrets or prejudicial to national security should be held in-camera to maintain confidentiality and secrecy. Therefore, Hakam calls upon the government to immediately amend the Independent Police Conduct Commission Act 2020 to incorporate the aforesaid Recommendations on an urgent and immediate basis to ensure Police Accountability in Malaysia. - Malay Mail, 1/7/2023

the 15th Parliament on Feb 26, the King said Anyone seeking to play politics should wait for the next general election. All parties must accept and respect the unity government that has been formed. I would like to remind you that this Parliament is the place where laws are enacted and that members of Parliament (MPs) are the legislators. Calling both the ruling government and the opposition to collaborate, the monarch said The success or failure of our country does not rest solely on the shoulders of the Prime Minister but is the responsibility of all 222 MPs who have been entrusted by the people to represent them in the government. All parties are well aware that my priority is the well-being of more than 33 million Malaysian citizens out there. Besides warning the opposition against threatening political stability, the King also took a jab at the monkeys who misbehave in the parliament, granting permission to the Dewan Rakyat (Lower House) Speaker to suspend MPs who cross the line for 14 days. In the same breath, Anwar government was also told to narrow its budget deficit and reform its policy on subsidies. Interestingly, in what appear to be a first attack against former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, Sultan Ibrahim said I am disheartened upon learning that due to the fiscal deficits incurred since 1998, the government today is bearing an increasingly large debt burden. Mahathir, whose 22 years iron-fist rule (from 1981 to 2003) saw the sacking of Anwar in 1998, was a bitter enemy of the Johor Sultanate. Its crystal clear that the King has given his strongest approval for the Unity Government, formed between Anwar-led Pakatan Harapan coalition and nemesis-turn-ally Barisan Nasional coalition after the November 2022 General Election that produced a hung parliament. In fact, his support for the PM was so obvious that he protects Anwar from the inherited RM1.5 trillion national debts. And it couldnt be any clearer that the King, who is also the ruler of the southernmost state of Johor, has locked the door and throws away the key to any evil coup by the opposition to form yet another backdoor government. While Anwar commands super-majority support in Parliament, power-crazy Perikatan Nasional kept hatching plans to topple the government in order to escape corruption charges. PAS YB Takiyuddin Hassan... Less than 24 hours after the royal address, however, Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS Parti Islam Se-Malaysia) rudely and arrogantly showed its middle finger to the Malay King. PAS secretary-general Takiyuddin Hassan has rubbished the Yang di-Pertuan Agongs (King) call for politicians to wait for the next 16th General Election to change government. Worse, PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang deliberately skipped the Kings inaugural royal address under dubious medical grounds. Having only attended 33 out of 103 Parliament sessions since July 26, 2021, Hadi demonstrates how he disrespects a Malay Ruler he claimed would defend and protect. Not that the King cares, but the opposition will pay dearly at a later stage. The arrogance of PAS, and its partner Bersatu (Malaysian United Indigenous Party) in Perikatan Nasional, will come back to haunt it. In the past, the role of the Agong (translates roughly as King of Kings) was mostly ceremonial. But as the Southeast Asian nation plunged into a new political landscape due to power-hungry Malay politicians, that role has become increasingly important. The PAS extremists should be careful what they wish for. They had forgotten how the King determined who holds power after the 15th national polls. Due to the extreme arrogance of Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin, who is also Perikatan Nasional chairman, a proposal by former King Sultan Abdullah of Pahang to form a unity government was flatly and arrogantly thrown away. Had power-hungry ex-prime minister Muhyiddin, backed by religious extremist Hadi, not rejected the royal proposal in Nov 2022, PAS and Bersatu would not have ended up in the opposition camp today. As a result of their strategic mistake and tactical blunder blinded by both arrogance and over-confidence, Pakatan Harapan and Barisan Nasional successfully formed the unity government. The burning question is what if the history repeats itself in the next 16th General Election? Under the unique system, the heads of Malaysias nine royal families take turns to be the King every five years. The Johor Sultans 5-year term as Agong, which began last month, will last till January 2029, whilst the next nationwide election must be held in Malaysia by February 2028. That means the King will still call the shot regardless whether Anwar dissolves the Lower House early or lets it expires in 2028. Who do you think Supreme Commander Agong will prefer to be the next prime minister should there be yet another hung parliament? Clearly Takiyuddin and Hadi, who possessed IQ of a carrot, have not considered that possibility. MIA???... What Sultan Ibrahim meant with his refusal to entertain any requests from any party to change the existing unity government was related to statutory declarations (SDs). Both Muhyiddin and Hadi didnt fully understand the anti-hopping law when they made a fool of themselves with dubious statutory declarations (SDs) thought to give them numbers to form a government. In Nov 2022, Muhyiddin tried to scam again then-King Sultan Abdullah by claiming that he possessed 115 SDs (statutory declarations) supporting him as the 10th Prime Minister, the same trick he used to cheat his way to become the 8th Prime Minister with just 108 SDs back in February 2020. This round, his gimmick was rejected flatly by the Palace. He only had the support of 84 MPs. To prove that Anwar has the numbers, less than a month after he became the premier, a confidence motion for him was won on Dec 19, 2022. Despite Muhyiddins weeks of whining, moaning and bitching that he had at least 115 MPs to support him as the prime minister, it was Anwar who had proven his legitimacy when he won a vote of confidence in the August House with a two-thirds majority. Therefore, the opposition can still overthrow Anwar legally and constitutionally, but certainly not through the obsolete method of statutory declarations. To do that, Perikatan Nasional just needs to initiate a vote of no confidence in Parliament, which does not need to go through the King, who has already declared that he wont entertain any request for a change of government. Only when PAS and Bersatu try to form a backdoor government using SDs, bringing a pile of documents with them, they need to request an appointment with the King to present their case. Otherwise, they dont need to meet the monarch. The catch is the lack of element of surprise when a motion of confidence is raised because it has to go through the House Speaker, who will alert the prime minister. Still, even if for some miracles the opposition could get the pro-government House Speaker to allow a motion of no confidence to be tabled against Anwar Ibrahim, and win the vote to topple the prime minister, theres no guarantee that Muhyiddin and Hadi can start popping champagne. Anwar could advise Sultan Ibrahim to dissolve the Parliament, which the King will gladly agree, paving the way for a snap election. In June 2020, just 3 months after Muhyiddin was sworn in as the countrys first backdoor prime minister, the Johor Sultan threatened to dissolve the state legislative assembly over selfish and power-crazy politicians trying to destabilize Johor. In August 2021, he issued the same threat again if there was a power struggle to change the state government. Sultan murka terhadap Presiden PAS. PAS derhaka terhadap Raja2Melayu. So, PAS extremists and Bersatu bigots are welcome to mock, belittle, insult and threaten the new King at their own peril. Arguably the most liberal and open-minded monarch, thanks to the proximity of Johor to Singapore, Sultan Ibrahim of Johor would do everything in his power to prevent the country from falling into the hands of radicals such as PAS Mullahs. Its not hard to understand why, despite having insulted and disrespected the King, PAS has the cheek to shamelessly twist and spin the royal address to demand equal allocations from the federal government. The Opposition, especially the Islamist party, was fabulously upset with the royal decree because with the back door sealed, they cant return to power and plunder national coffers. Without money, the corrupt PAS and Bersatu wont be able to survive till the next election, which is another 4 years away. A nationwide election needs money, lots of money. The RM90 million bribes Hadi received from former PM Najib Razak had allowed the Islamist party to contest a whopping 155 out of 222 parliamentary seats in the 2018 General Election. In the 2022 national polls, as a member of the backdoor government, PAS had access to hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions, which allowed it to bribe Malay voters and won 43 seats, becoming the biggest party in the country. In the next election, it would be hard to fund its election machinery and grassroots after accounts of its major sponsor Bersatu has been frozen. Worse, Hadis cuddling with Mahathir failed spectacularly after the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) froze accounts and assets of super-billionaire Daim Zainuddin, the major financier of Mahathir, whose mega-rich sons are also under investigations for possible money laundering. This is why PAS desperados are begging Malay nationalist UMNO to quit Anwar government and revive Muafakat Nasional. Having tasted blood, PAS must return to power by hook or by crook. However, the failure of Dubai Move to unseat Anwar has strengthened the prime ministers position. To add salt to injury, half a dozen lawmakers from Bersatu have switched sides to the unity government. With the Kings reluctance to entertain a political coup, its a matter of time before more opposition MPs jump ship again. The opposition needs all the friends it needed in the Palace. But like the Iranian Revolution 1979, snake oil salesman Mullah Hadi Awang and his minions thought they were more powerful than The Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King). Call it revengeful or whatever you like, but the Royal House of Johor remembers those who disrespect them. And PAS has done an excellent job of insulting the monarch. - FT Timbul persoalan.Hantu mana yang hubungi Wan Saiful?... Ko apahal Cepul? See Penang no kantoi menipu? Ko tak belajar dengan Mahiaddin & Taki ke? Dorang kan expert. Ini dalam masa dua hari,dua kali kantoi! SPRM nafikan pegawainya ada menghubungi Saiful. Pulak dah. Habis tu siapa yang hubungi dia? kot? Jaga-jaga Saiful. Dia ada mintak no IC tak? Wei mat. Dunia sekarang ni, bukan macam dulu boleh suka-suka cakap. Sekarang ni, ko cakap je, kurang 5 saat dah tersebar cakap ko tu. Segalanya di hujung jari. So tak payah nak menipu sangat la. - Raja Gelap II Sultan Selangor amat dukacita, Hadi hina Raja-Raja Melayu... Ini baru betul kepada sultan, kepada Ulil Amri. Bukan setakat derhaka, bahkan sengaja menerbitkan penulisan dengan maksud mengelirukan orang awam. Jelas bertentangan dengan adab dan budaya orang Melayu. Benar PAS adalah dalam alam Melayu. - Raja Gelap II DYMM Sultan Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah Alhaj menzahirkan rasa amat dukacita dengan kenyataan YB Tan Sri Dato Seri Abdul Hadi Awang pada 20 Februari 2024 yang bertajuk Ketinggian Islam Wajib Dipertahankan yang ditujukan kepada alim ulama, para peguam, hakim-hakim, ahli-ahli parlimen dan Dewan Undangan Negeri serta Raja-Raja Melayu. Susulan itu, Baginda berkenan mengutus sepucuk surat kepada beliau menerusi Pesuruhjaya PAS Negeri Selangor, YB Dato Dr. Ab. Halim Tamuri, seperti berikut... PAS sendiri buat salah,terus salahkan DAP pulak? Bodoh sombong betoi... Fitnah walaun lebai piang bengong... A baby & toddler has passed away due to starvation caused by the Israeli-imposed siege on Gaza... cheers.

and respect the unity government that has been formed. Should any of you want to play politics, then wait until the next election," he said. Sultan Ibrahim urged all MPs to work together towards building the nation and serving the rakyat as the country's success or failure should be on the shoulders of every elected representative. Since the 14th general election in 2018 - which saw the BN ruling coalition defeated for the first time in 60 years - Malaysia had witnessed constant political realignment and coup attempts. The political instability had led to three different prime ministers leading the country in a single Parliament term. From Sheraton to Dubai... The first coup happened in 2020 when Bersatu, along with 11 MPs from PKR, left the Pakatan Harapan coalition to form a new government with several other parties including Umno. Dubbed the Sheraton Move, the political manoeuvre caused the collapse of the then Harapan government and the resignation of Dr Mahathir Mohamad as its prime minister. Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin then took over the office as Malaysias eighth prime minister, with the support of his new coalition named Perikatan Nasional and several other parties, including from Sabah and Sarawak. In August 2021, Muhyiddin was forced to resign as prime minister following divisions between him and Umno. He was replaced by Umno vice-president Ismail Sabri Yaakob, who managed to secure some political stability through a memorandum of understanding with Harapan until the 15th general election in November 2022. The general election results came back with no single party or coalition having enough numbers to form the government on its own. The inability of political parties to secure enough cooperation to cross the 112 MPs threshold had created an impasse, before the then Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah decreed for a unity government to be formed. Btw, mana lebai Marang???... The call was heeded by Harapan, Umno, Sarawaks GPS, and several other parties which then formed a government with Anwar Ibrahim as the prime minister, while Muhyiddin-led PN decided to stay as the opposition. Rumours about a change of administration - or prime minister - started as soon as Harapan allied with BN to form the federal government following the general election. In May 2023, there were rumours of alleged attempts to force by-elections in BN-held seats with the elected representatives quitting their parties. Another rumour surfaced in late 2023 when Community Communications Department deputy director Ismail Yusop claimed the opposition was planning a Dubai Move to topple Anwars administration. - mk Sultan Ibrahim whos proclaimed the 17th King on Jan 31 said its been less than a month since he ascended to the federal throne, his majesty is still learning the ropes but issued stern warnings to MPs not to play politics, unite and work together to serve the people. - Melissa Goh Walk out lagi,lama2 walkover... Saya missed acara wajib PN di Parlimen walk out lagi, walaupun baru semalam titah YDP Agong pasal adab di Parlimen. Pengerusi PN, Tan Sri Muhyiddin berkata: Just because they have a majority, they do what they want without following the procedures that have been in place Masa dia tak de majoriti di Parlimen dan bukan PM, dia walk out. Masa dia tak yakin majoriti di Parlimen dan dia PM, dia isytihar darurat gantung parlimen. Sepanjang saya menjadi Ahli Parlimen pembangkang, saya tak pernah bangun ganggu perbahasan dengan menggunakan Standing Order (atau Peraturan Mesyuarat) seperti yang berlaku dengan pembangkang sekarang. Walaupun pada satu ketika, bekas Ahli Parlimen Ketereh, Tan Sri Annuar Musa mengejek Ahli Parlimen Pondan, eyh salah Pandan konon untuk buat lawak dan terang-terang melanggar Peraturan Mesyuarat. Saya hanya menjawab Umur Ketereh tak jauh beza dengan umur ayah saya dan rakyat melihat akhlaknya pada usia itu. Kerana waktu yang ada untuk Ahli Parlimen berucap itu pendek, sekitar 5-7 minit sahaja. Gunakanlah peluang itu untuk menyampaikan perkara yang substantif, lebih-lebih jika pembangkang kerana itu sahajalah peluang untuk kita pamerkan kemampuan kita mentadbir dengan cetusan idea yang lebih baik dari kerajaan. Malangnya, pembangkang yang ada selalunya ketandusan idea untuk membahaskan perkara-perkara yang substantif. Akhirnya mereka melengahkan dan mencuri masa dewan dengan perkara remeh temeh yang berlegar sekitar Standing Order (selalunya atas alasan mengelirukan dewan, padahal mereka yang mudah terkeliru). Walaupun tugas Speaker Dewan menjadi lebih sukar dan tekanan darah naik sepanjang masa, amalan walk out oleh PN ini akan memakan diri, jika tidak berjaya mempamerkan fungsi pembangkang di Parlimen. Lama-lama dari walk out menjadi walk over.(dalam kepala terngiang-ngiang Putrajaya menjerit Tarik Balik, ulang 100x) - YB.Rafizi Ramli Perdana Menteri Anwar Ibrahim merafat sembah mengucapkan tahniah dan ikrar taat setia kepada Yang diPertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim Ibni Sultan Islandar dan Permainsuri Agong serta merakam ucapan terima kasih keapada Al Sultan Abdullah dan permaisuri yang telah berkhidmat sebagai Yang diPertuan Agong sebelum ini. Anwar menyampaikan kalungan tahniah dan terima kasih itu di dewan rakyat hari ini. Malangnya rafat sembah Perdana Menyeri itu tidak diikuti pihak pembangkang yang bertindak keluar dewan. Apakah tindakan itu menggambarkan pembangkang tidak bersetuju dengan rafat sembah dan ucapan tahniah dan terima kasih itu? - mso YB Pendang mohon maaf... Benda boleh settle elok2 ko org gi belasah sampai mati pasai apa?... Hadap la idop dalam penjara. Org yg dilangar takde apa apa, ko yg melebih kejar tentu la dia lari panik. Dah dapat korang ikat, pijak ramai ramai. Apa punya perangai ntah. Mcm besar sangat kesalahan arwah. Biasa la exciden kalau langar lari, report langar lari selesai la. Kemahiran berfikir takde ke camna? Umur dah 30an 40an dah. - Man Toba MH370 a new hope... During the past 24 hours... Aaron Bushnell, 25 year old active member of the US Air Force, has succumbed to his injuries in hospital after setting himself on fire in front of the Israeli embassy in Washington DC, in protest of the genocide in Gaza.His last words were "Free Palestine"... cheers.

their first house > but if is irrational and unjust if it applies to the purchase of 2nd, 3rd, 4th, house, an entitlement that is enjoyed even by the rich and the super-rich Bumiputra buyer.. Where is this bumi discount for houses coming from - this allocation of certain number of units coming from? Well, looking at Art.153 of Federal Constitution, it talks only about '... positions in the public service (other than the public service of a State) and of scholarships, exhibitions and other similar educational or training privileges or special facilities given or accorded by the Federal Government and, when any permit or licence for the operation of any trade or business is required by federal law, then, subject to the provisions of that law and this Article, of such permits and licences...' . There is no mention of DISCOUNTS when you purchase houses, or shops, is there? Art 153 also does not talk about Bumiputra - it only talks about the '...special position of the Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak...'. At present, there is no legal definition of who is considered a 'Bumiputra' - does it include other than ' Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak.' Hence, if we are talking about discounts, by virtue of Art. 153, then it must limited to ONLY the qualified Malay and natives of Sabah/Sarawak - Not to the NEW Malays, as later arrivals from Indonesia may even now be taken to be Malays {Reasonably, the other biggest group other than Malays, given the fact that we share a significant border with Indonesia - but then national statistics do not disclose the number of Indonesian Malaysians, does it now.???) I heard that this is NOT A CONDITION IMPOSED by the Federal Government , but rather the Local Government(Council) who has the full authority in approving development projects - housing estates, commercial properties, etc > and apparently, the condition is imposed when the granting of license to build to developers. Other conditions may include a playground/field for residents, an office space for management committees, meeting room for community meetings, surau or prayer rooms, spaces. Of course, at the end of the day, it the purchasers of the houses that end up paying for everything. Now, one of this conditions for a DEVELOPER to get his development permit allegedly is a QUOTA reserved for ONLY Bumiputra/Malay buyers, whereby the units therein must be sold at 7-15% discount. Unlike land, that is clearly marked Malay(or maybe now Bumiputra) reserved land - no non-Bumiputra can buy it > when the sale is to be registered in the Land Office, it will be denied. Houses and commercial property, which come under the local government(council) are not so clearly defined. You see for land for sale clearly that it is a Malay/Bumiputra reserved Lot - not the same for Houses > and this can lead to an innocent buyer purchasing a 'Malay reserved house' thinking it is just a normal house... MORE than a decade after purchasing their dream homes, hundreds of homeowners in Selangor find themselves trapped in a nightmarish situation.They had unknowingly bought bumiputra units and are now saddled with penalty fees amounting to millions as the developers have gone into liquidation. Unity - how does a person feel when he/she has to pay 400k for a house, but a fellow Malaysian of a particular ethnicity have to pay only RM360k even though the later is richer person under the T20 category ... or even having same income. The one paying more also believes developers seldom lose out on profits, which means he/she is ultimately paying more just to 'subsidize' the later(Malay/Bumiputra) buyer? If the government is providing SUBSIDY, that means whenever a Malay/Bumiputra buys a house, the puchaser pays 90% of the unit price, and the government pays the rest. I do not think this happens, which means that the other house buyers end up indirectly footing the 'discount' granted to the Bumiputra/Malay house buyer - this is just not right or JUST. Further, the Malay/Bumiputra is not just entitled to the discount when he/she buys his first house/shop - but even when he/she buys his/her 10th unit... something the government must consider and revise. Should 'discounts' be available for shops/houses irrespective of the sale price - or should it be limited to only certain category like low-cost units? HBA: Limit bumi discount to first two houses By The Editor / TheEdge 07 Aug 2013, 05:36 am Updated - 21 Aug 2014 KUALA LUMPUR: A cap on the 7% to 10% discount for bumiputera house buyers is a controversial but much-needed initiative to address spiralling house prices. The National House Buyers Association (HBA) said the powers-that-be would have to just bite the bullet and explore such reforms if it were sincere in providing affordable housing to all. In its presentation on July 17 at a discussion on housing issues, the HBA proposed that bumiputera discounts be limited to the first two properties. HBA honorary secretary-general Chang Kim Loong said one must look at the spirit of the bumiputera discount, which was to allow not so well-off bumiputeras to own homes and avoid polarisation of neighbourhoods. It gives food for thought as to why the well-off should also enjoy this privilege, he said, revealing that the HBA had proposed that high-end properties such as penthouses, semi-detached houses and bungalows be exempted from the bumiputera discount privilege. It also proposed a price cap of RM1 million to enjoy the discount. Other than that, a growing number of unsold bumiputera lots is also contributing to the glut. Instead of looking for more development sites, these unsold units should be opened up faster, Chang said. This is one area where the HBA and the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (Rehda) are on the same page. Rehda president Datuk Seri Michael Yam had last year proposed that unsold bumiputera lots be sold to non-bumiputeras six months after the property receives its certificate of fitness (CF). There are about RM4 billion worth of unsold bumiputera property and Rehda has also been championing for a review of the 30% bumiputera quota imposed on developers. However, Chang cautioned that this proposal must be dealt with delicately to avoid misunderstanding. We must explain this carefully and underline that reviewing this policy is merely a practical measure to resolve a bigger problem. It will benefit all Malaysians in the long run as there will be more supply, he said. The HBA also opined that the steep rise in property prices was attributed to the lack of land, hence opening up government landbanks would be one initiative that the authorities should consider. Other measures to control the cost of constructing houses touch on specific government policies such as allowing direct recruitment of foreign workers instead of the current practice of hiring via agents; reducing the levy on foreign workers; and transferring the burden of providing utilities in new developments from the developer to utility companies. Another proposal which the government is already looking into is to reduce the approval time frame for construction permits. Currently, it takes up to 392 days for an approval, although this can be brought down to 67 days via a one-stop centre. The target is to further reduce this time frame to 47 days by next year. Firms breach bumi-housing quota, buyers penalised By BAVANI M and SHALINI RAVINDRAN Metro News Monday, 06 Nov 2023 More than 500 unit owners of a housing project in Rawang were sold bumiputra lots without their knowledge. Photos: AZLINA ABDULLAH and LOW LAY PHON/The Star MORE than a decade after purchasing their dream homes, hundreds of homeowners in Selangor find themselves trapped in a nightmarish situation. They had unknowingly bought bumiputra units and are now saddled with penalty fees amounting to millions as the developers have gone into liquidation. Shawn Nair and his wife Vicky Fang bought their unit in 2006 and moved in after it was completed in 2008. Their new home was marketed as a well-planned township surrounded by greenery in Rawang, Selangor. It was a townhouse and was built on elevated ground, surrounded by foliage-covered hills, said Shawn. However, early this year, the couple received a notice from liquidators appointed for the developer who had built their home. It said the developer had gone bankrupt and had sold them a bumiputra unit. The couple discovered that they were not the only ones. A total of 574 homeowners are now being asked to pay millions of ringgit in penalty fees to the Selangor government for purchasing bumiputra lots in the project which had a total of 1,716 units. The bumiputra housing quota policy has been in force since the 1980s. Developers are required to set aside a percentage of available units in a scheme for purchase by bumiputra buyers. Bumiputra land or property can only be purchased and owned by bumiputra . A bumiputra unit is usually 7% to 15% cheaper than a regular one, depending on the state. Innocent buyers penalised In the case of Shawn and his neighbours, the Selangor Housing and Property Board (LPHS) issued a notice to the liquidator on Jan 16 this year. The notice stated that in order for LPHS to release the bumiputra lots to non- bumi owners, the buyers have to pay RM13mil in total. Otherwise, the blanket consent for transfer will not be released. For Shawn and Fang to receive their strata title, they have to pay a penalty of over RM20,000. We are still in shock as we paid full price (for the property), said Shawn. There was no discount, nor was there any indication in the sales and purchase agreement that this was a bumiputra unit. Another unit owner, Susan Lawrence, 43, was equally dismayed. The developer had breached the approved bumiputra quota allocation, meaning he had sold to non- bumiputra buyers. If we dont pay, we wont be able to get our strata titles. The Selangor Land and Mines Office (PTGS) is refusing to release the titles unless we pay a 12% penalty, she said, stressing that she had also paid full price for her unit. It feels like we are being punished even though we are innocent, and that is unacceptable, she added. Shawn felt that the discrepancy should have been detected at the start. When you look at a bumiputra lot and see an Indian name attached to the title, wouldnt this trigger alarm bells? Without a strata title, we cannot sell or refinance our property unless we pay the penalty to enable the memorandum of transfer, he said. Shawn (left), Susan (second from right) and other housebuyers of the Rawang development are in a bind. The liquidator discovered that the developer had failed to apply for blanket consent and breached the allocation quota in the sale of bumiputra units. In documents sighted by StarMetro , Selangor State Executive Council (MMKN) had on July 9, 2001, approved a minimum 40% bumiputra quota with a discount of 10% to bumiputra buyers for the project in Rawang. The developer had breached the quota requirement and had sold about 90% of units to non- bumiputra buyers. The liquidators letter to buyers stated that after contacting LPHS, the state housing board still wanted homeowners to pay a penalty for breaching the bumiputra quota, but was willing to give a discount. But buyers like Lawrence and Shawn are adamant that they should not be penalised, and are refusing to pay. Most are middle-income earners who are already struggling with the high cost of living. The fee that is being imposed comprises the bumiputra discount of 7% and an additional 5% penalty, or 12% of the purchase price ( see chart ). Same issue elsewhere Homeowners in a project in Subang Jaya are facing a similar predicament. Several were told to pay the penalty for their bumiputra units, which were built by a different developer. A unit owner, who wanted to be identified only as Gwee, received vacant possession of his house in 2013. The project is a mixed development comprising landed property and a condominium. Gwee was contacted by the liquidator for the developer about three years ago to start the strata title process. Several homeowners in a Subang Jaya mixed development have also been asked to pay a 12% penalty. During the application, he was asked to pay a penalty as he had purchased a bumiputra lot. This came as a shock as nowhere in my sales and purchase agreement did it state that I was buying a bumiputra lot. It wasnt only me; about 200 of the owners of the strata property are also affected by this (overselling of bumiputra lots), he said. Gwee said owners were being forced to pay an additional 12% of the purchase price. So if a unit was purchased for RM500,000, the owners now have to pay an extra RM60,000. This is an exorbitant amount, he said.He added that as the developer was currently under liquidation, it further complicated the issue. Gwee said there had been little progress in resolving the matter. He said most of the owners felt that they should not be held liable for something that was not their fault. When asked to comment on the matter, Selangor housing and culture committee chairman Borhan Aman Shah said there was a need to ensure that companies could not take advantage of the situation to make a profit. He emphasised the importance of identifying the developers involved, adding that non-compliance (with the bumiputra quota policy) could affect these companies future projects in Selangor. As administrators, we have rules that can affect their development plans if they do not follow government policies, he said. Review Article 153, revamp affirmative action to needs-based, govt told Pakatan Harapan MP Hassan Karim says there is no point in helping wealthy people when others are struggling. FMT Reporters - KUALA LUMPUR: An opposition MP has called for a review of Article 153 of the Federal Constitution so that affirmative action policies can be revamped to be more needs-based. Hassan Karim (PH-Pasir Gudang) made this appeal to the government while debating the Supply Bill 2022 in the Dewan Rakyat today. What is the point of helping wealthy Malays who own stocks and are able to stash money in offshore accounts when poor Chinese, Indians, and indigenous people (Orang Asli) are struggling? he asked. Interjected by Che Abdullah Mat Nawi (PAS-Tumpat), who asked him to clarify his suggestion on reviewing Article 153, which touches on the special privileges of the Malays and Bumiputeras, and his idea of social justice, Hassan replied that a review of Article 153 was necessary because the Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia, whom he called the actual Bumiputeras, were not included. He also criticised the disparity between the allocations for the Malays/Bumiputeras and non-Malays in Budget 2022, with the former being allocated RM11.4 billion compared to RM300 million for the others. I want Malay MPs to question this injustice. I have my non-Malay constituents asking me whether they are second-class or third-class citizens. They also ask why a country that fought the apartheid states of South Africa and Israel is discriminating against them. I hope that whichever government that is formed after GE15 will rework this budget to get rid of these racial boxes, the former Johor PKR chief said. Hassan also called for the government to amend the Supply Bill to provide a bigger allocation for the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) as the amount of RM303 million was too small for the agency. He said that despite the criticisms against MACC, it must be credited for retrieving more than RM14 billion misappropriated from 1MDB. - FMT

Hamidi's case, the Prosecution had SUCCESSFULLY proved all the elements of the crime to the satisfaction of the Court - and hence the court called on Zahid Hamidi to enter his DEFENCE - and Zahid himself took the stand as witness, and called more than 10 Defence Witnesses...before the Prosecution decided to discontinue criminal prosecution 'TEMPORARILY'. In another case, prosecution failed to prove Prima Facie case, and Zahid was acquitted without Defence being called. NOW ZAHID HAMIDI HAD A FAIR TRIAL THUS FAR.. - He was represented by lawyers, who had every opportunity to challenge all Prosecution Witnesses, and also all other evidence tendered in court. - During the DEFENCE stage, Zahid can call any witnesses to prove his innocence...He can also RE-CALL Prosecution witnesses if he wants to. HENCE, there is really no PREJUDICE or DISADVANTAGE as to the right of a FAIR TRIAL . In Malaysia, as is the case in most Commonwealth countries and other countries, the GUILT or 'not guilty" decision is left to the Court and Judges - and no one else. A not guilty verdict does not mean innocent - only that the Prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt , and it ensures that individuals are not convicted unless their guilt has been proven beyond any possible question. , which is a very HIGH STANDARD of Proof - maybe about 99% or more that he/she is guilty , so even if the prosecution managed to prove 80% or 90%, it is may simply not be enough for the accused to be convicted. The high burden is to prevent miscarriage of justice - It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer. as expressed by the English jurist William Blackstone. The discontinuation of the criminal trial/proceedings was done by the PREVIOUS Attorney General/Public Prosecutor Idrus Harun before he ended his term (But wasn't his term supposed to end in March 2023???) . Now, Malaysia has a NEW Attorney General/Public Prosecutor Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh - does he agree with the decision of the previous AG/Public Prosecutor or not, and he really ought to tell us all in Malaysia and also whether the Prosecution needs more time or not. Or should he charge Zahid Hamidi again - so trial continues where it ended...using section 254A of the Criminal Procedure Code. 254AReinstatement of trial after discharge (Criminal Procedure Code) (1) Subject to subsection (2), where an accused has been given a discharge by the Court and he is recharged for the same offence, his trial shall be reinstated and be continued as if there had been no such order given. (2) Subsection (1) shall only apply where witnesses have been called to give evidence at the trial before the order for a discharge has been given by the Court. Oddly, the then LEAD PROSECUTOR of Zahid's case was removed(or left on her own) before the decision was made to DISCONTINUE criminal proceedings. It is very very ODD as normally, being the most familiar with the case, he/she would have endured on until the very end - at least until the age of retirement. Even after retirement, she could still continue as the LEAD PROSECUTOR - so what happened? Did she leave in 'protest' because she could not agree with the then AG/PP's decision to suddenly halt and discontinue the criminal trial? On Aug 8, the New Straits Times confirmed that Raja Rozela, 58, had been -year-old was dropped from the Yayasan Akalbudi trial. If DPP Raja Rozela Raja Toran continues to prosecute, Zahid Hamidi will likely be convicted and sentenced? Come back and prosecute to the end.. But alas, Raja Rozela may not be able to return and lead the prosecution as she was appointed a Judicial Commissioner on 8/12/2023. A contract 'judge' with no security of tenure, who may or may not be later elevated to Judge (something which the PM has a big say). I have been calling for the ABOLITION OF JUDICIAL COMMISSIONERS - they should immediately be appointed as JUDGES with all the safeguards including security of tenure to ensure Independence. The lead prosecutor who had been dropped from Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's corruption trial was appointed as a judicial commissioner. Was the appointment of Raja Rozela a 'calculated move' - the removal of the LEAD prosecutor who had handled the case from the very begining...? Now, she cannot even be brought back to lead the prosecution... We recall that the past '...Attorney-General Apandi Ali had cleared Prime Minister Najib Razak of any offences pertaining to the RM2.6 billion donation and the RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd...'. However, the subsequent Attorney General Tommy Thomas disagreed with his predecessor, and Najib was charged - and now is in prison after losing all appeals(and other applications). Hence, AG Appandi Ali WAS WRONG, and AG Tommy Thomas was right... So, should NEW AG/PP review what his predecessor did with Zahid Hamidi's case? Does he agree with the decision of his predecessor or not? Another earlier AG/PP that was affected by the 1MDB case was Abdul Gani Patail who was handed his termination letter in the wake of the 1Malaysia Dvelopment Bhd (1MDB) scandal in 2 . Allegedly, he was then taking steps to charge people in court with regard the 1MDB case. Najib was still Prime Minister then. Datuk Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh has been appointed to be Malaysia's next attorney general from September 6 ...Terrirudin will replace Tan Sri Idrus Harun whose contract ends on September 5. Note that on 4th September, The prosecution on Monday decided to withdraw all 47 charges of criminal breach of trust, graft, and money laundering faced by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, after applying to discharge all the charges. ' At the start of the trial on Monday, deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar told the judge that he had instructions from Attorney General Tan Sri Idrus Harun to discontinue the charges against Zahid. Mohd Dusuki told the judge that the case should be classified as DNAA as the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is still investigating the charges, after Zahid had sent letters of representation to both the AG and the MACC earlier this year. Why should the PP/AG still recharge Zahid Hamidi and let the trial continue? At the end of the day, it is the court that decides whether any accused is GUILTY or not... so TRUST the Judge and the COURTS. Let the court consider all evidence, including the one's contained in Zahid's letters of representation - and at the end of the trial, let the Judge decide whether Zahid is GUILTY or NOT. In Zahid's case, NOTE that the prosecution had already successfully proved a PRIMA FACIE case against Zahid - meaning that if Zahid now fails to raise a 'reasonable doubt' he will 100% be convicted and sentenced according to law. It is not for the AG/Public Prosecutor to decide whether one is GUILTY or Not. It is not for the police or even the Prime Minister.It is for the COURT to decide after a FAIR TRIAL - so recharge Zahid, and let the Court decide... By discontinuing the criminal case mid-stream, the Court is unable to do what it is supposed to do, i.e decide on the GUILT of Zahid Hamidi. So, charge him again and let the TRIAL continue until the end... TRUE, PM Anwar Ibrahim or the current PH led coalition government, where BN/UMNO is a key partner that allowed PH to get the needed numbers for Anwar to be PH, may not have been involved in the decision made by AG/PP Idrus Harun ---- BUT, public perception is another matter... given the following factors:- 1) The lead Prosecutor was suddenly removed - she did not retire. WHY? 2) Then the Public Prosecutor/Attorney General Idrus Harun, on the day before he ends his term DISCONTINUES the case against Zahid. [Note Najib's alleged pardon also came day/s before the King ended his term] . No one could even directly question the AG/PP IDRUS HARUN as he was no longer the AG/PP of Malaysia. Remember that Idrus Harun was first given a 1-year contract, and then a 2nd 6 month contract. The Malaysian government today announced that Tan Sri Idrus Harun has been reappointed as the attorney general (AG), and that he would be serving one year under the latest appointment.... Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Mohd Zuki Ali made the announcement today. It is notified that in line with Article 145(1) of the Federal Constitution, Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-Pertuan Agong has assented to the reappointment of Y Bhg. Tan Sri Idrus bin Harun as attorney general for a period of one (1) year with effect from March 6, 2022, Mohd Zuki said in a brief one-paragraph statement today. And then, another 6 month extension Attorney General Tan Sri Idrus Harun has been re-appointed as the country's top law officer for a period of six months...."His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has approved the re-appointment of Tan Sri Idrus Harun as Attorney General for a period of six months effective from March 6," After he ended his term on 5 September, he was a ppointed as Chairman of a GLC. Former attorney general Tan Sri ldrus Harun has been appointed as the new chairman of Amanah Raya Bhd (AmanahRaya) effective from Oct 10. - and is this not under the Finance Ministry, where the Finance Minister is Anwar Ibrahim. It looks 'like a thank you' gift from Anwar - for what? For discontinuing his Deputy PM's criminal trial? That is what it may look like to some members of the public, and this is not good at all...It may not be, but maybe Anwar ought to clarify... REFORM NEEDED - No retiring AG/PP, Judges,and Senior Public Servants can be appointed to any company or government position immediately after retirement maybe for a 'cooling off period' of at least 3 years. Maybe, we need a specific law that governs post-retirement or after serving out their contractual term as AG/PP or senior public officials. The law should prohibit disclosure of 'insider confidential information' to new employer or others. The law should prohibit direct dealings with Public Prosecutors(in the case of a retiring AG/PP or senior prosecution staff) for the new employer > a senior still have a lot of 'infleunce' with their juniors still in public service... WE SHOULD REALLY THINK OF THIS? After all, these persons still enjoy large pensions .. REFORM NEEDED : - The Public Prosecutor must be provided with safeguards to maintain their independence, including SECURITY OF TENURE. The practice of extending their tenure post-retirement via contracts must stop - as there are sufficient capable Malaysians who can be appointed as the NEW Public Prosecutor(and/or AG). - Note Gani Patail was prematurely removed from office - Idrus Harun, after he retired was given a 1 year contract, then a 6 month contract > such practice is BAD as the Public Prosecutor/AG may end up being 'government friendly' rather than being truly INDEPENDENT, as his hopes that he will be given another contract extension...may impact his/her independence. Best, when they reach retirement age, they RETIRE and a NEW PP/AG is appointed. The possibility of extension of tenure undermines security of tenure as a safeguard to ensure Independence - especially independence from the State and the appointing authority. Waiting for JudgeCollin Lawrence Sequerah to RETIRE so that they can get a new Judge to hear Zahid Hamidi's Case. This is not right, as the same judge who heard Zahid Hamidi's from start, who also after prosecution decided that the prosecution had proven a prima facie case and ordered Zahid Hamidi to present the Defence case, must be the JUDGE who hears the case until the very end - and decide whether Zahid is GUILTY or Note. Even if Judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah decides at the end of trial that Zahid is guilty, convicts and sentence him - Zahid has still the right to appeal to the Court of Appeal or even later to the Federal Court, and the Appeal Courts may disagree with the trial judge. A judge decides not only on the evidence submitted, but he also asses the witnesses when they testify(deciding on the amount of weight that ought to be given to any particular witness). If another judge takes over Zahid's criminal case, all he has is the Notes of Evidence - and he may not be able to determine the credibility of the witnesses just by reading notes of proceedings. BEST, in the interest of JUSTICE that it is the SAME judge that hears and determines, especially criminal trials from begining to end. There are JUDGES and judges, and some have been found wanting by the public like the now infamouse Judge Augustine Paul... HOPE that the PP/Judge is not delaying on using the power to re-CHARGE Zahid so the trial can continue from where it ended until Judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah RETIRES? SELECTIVE NON-PROSECUTION is a serious issue... Najib cleared by AG on RM2.6b and RM42m from SRC Intl Apandi Ali says he has thoroughly studied papers submitted to him by MACC and finds there are no criminal elements involved, and orders the cases closed. Tarrence Tan - 26 Jan 2016, 11:53am PETALING JAYA: Attorney-General Apandi Ali has cleared Prime Minister Najib Razak of any offences pertaining to the RM2.6 billion donation and the RM42 million from SRC International Sdn Bhd. In a hurriedly gathered press conference, Apandi announced that he had thoroughly studied the papers submitted to him by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and ordered the cases closed. I am satisfied that based on the evidence from witnesses and supporting documents submitted to me by the MACC, it shows that the sum of USD681 million (RM2.08 billion) transferred into the personal accounts of the PM between 22.03.2013 and 10.04.2013 is a personal donation to the PM by the Saudi Royal family. Evidence obtained from the investigation does not show that the donation was given as an inducement or reward for doing anything in relation to his (Najibs) capacity as PM, he said. Apandi said the fact that the MACC had met and recorded statements from witnesses, including the donor, also confirmed that the donation was given personally and not given as a form of gratification, or given corruptly. Apandi also said that Najib had on August 2013 returned a sum of USD620 million (RM2.03billion) back to the Saudi royal family as the sum was not utilised. The AG also cleared Najib on the charge of receiving RM42 million from SRC International, saying there was no evidence to show that the PM had abused his position during the cabinet meeting which approved the government guarantee on the RM4 billion loan to SRC from Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (KWAP). Evidence also shows that the loan approved by KWAP and the loan guarantee by the cabinet was properly done [and there is] no evidence to show the PM had solicited or was promised any gratification from any party, either before, during, or after the cabinet decision was made, he said. He summarized that MACCs investigation did not show that the PM had committed any act of corruption. Thus, he said there was no necessity for Malaysia to make a request for mutual legal assistance to any foreign state for the purpose of completing the criminal investigation by the MACC. It was previously reported that Apandi had sent the investigation papers on both cases back to the MACC, requesting additional information on suggestions and recommendations made by them. The RM2.6 billion came to light following a report by the Wall Street Journal that alleged the sum was channeled into Najibs personal bank accounts just before the general election of 2013. The report also claimed the money had come from 1Malaysia Development Bhd although the MACC, after investigating the matter, denied this. Najib later revealed that the money was a political donation given to him by someone from the Middle East to help him and Barisan Nasional win in the 13th General Election. It was also alleged that Najib had received RM42 million from SRC International, a former subsidiary of 1MDB before it was placed under the Finance Ministry in 2 . The Finance Minister, however, denied the sum was banked into his account. Earlier this month, former Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad predicted Apandi would ignore the MACCs report on the donation and SRC International and that nothing significant would come out of the investigations. - FMT, 26/1/2016 Prosecution withdraws all 47 charges against Zahid after four-year trial By Timothy Achariam / theedgemalaysia.com 04 Sep 2023, 11:26 am Updated - 01:44 pm The reasons given by the learned DPP, including that of the setting up of the RCI [...] does not in any manner suggest that as far as the charges involved in this case [is concerned], that this is the end of the matter. High Court Justice Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah KUALA LUMPUR (Sept 4): The prosecution on Monday decided to withdraw all 47 charges of criminal breach of trust, graft, and money laundering faced by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, after applying to discharge all the charges. The High Court judge in the Yayasan Akalbudi trial, Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah, upheld the prosecutions application for a discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) for Zahid, as opposed to the defences request for a full acquittal. A DNAA means an accused person can face trial for the same charges in the future, if the prosecution decides to reinstate them. The decision ended a trial which had spanned three years and ten months involving 99 witnesses, and which hadestablished a prima facie case with Zahid having entered his defence. At the start of the trial on Monday, deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar told the judge that he had instructions from Attorney General Tan Sri Idrus Harun to discontinue the charges against Zahid. Mohd Dusuki told the judge that the case should be classified as DNAA as the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is still investigating the charges, after Zahid had sent letters of representation to both the AG and the MACC earlier this year. However, Zahids lawyer Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik had asked the judge to consider a full acquittal instead, as the prosecution did not give a timeline to complete its investigations. Sequerah asked the court to stand down while he deliberated on the matter and came back a few moments later to quash the defence's application and uphold the DNAA sought by the prosecution. In reading out his decision, Sequerah said the prosecution had intimated that while it has sought a DNAA, investigations against Zahid are still ongoing. It is clear from the reasons given by prosecution that investigations are still ongoing as a result of representations made by the defence. However, it must be borne in mind that it was intimated to the court on a previous occasion, when an adjournment was sought for by the defence, that these representations took up several pages, I think it ran into hundreds of pages, if memory serves me correctly, the judge said. It is therefore justified that the prosecution needs more time to examine these representations, which also involves taking statements from various individuals, Sequerah added. Sequerah also said the prosecution had asked for the DNAA based on a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) on former AG Tan Sri Tommy Thomas controversial memoir. According to the prosecution, there is a need to investigate Thomas memoir, which is relevant to Zahids charges. The judge said that just because the DNAA is granted, this does not mean that it is the end of the matter. The reasons given by the learned DPP, including that of the setting up of the RCI although they do not have a timeline, does not in any manner suggest that as far as the charges involved in this case [is concerned], that this is the end of the matter, he said. Sequerah further said the trial commenced on Nov 18, 2019 and to date, some 77 days of trial has elapsed. He also added the case was at the defence stage with Zahids 15th witness giving evidence. The prosecution have in my considered view, given considered reasons why they seek a DNAA in this case, Sequerah said before granting the DNAA. Zahid, who is Bagan Datuk Member of Parliament, was ordered by Sequerah to enter his defence in respect of all 47 corruption charges in relation to Yayasan Akalbudi last year. Twelve of them are criminal breach of trust charges, followed by eight for graft, and 27 for money laundering. In October last year, Zahid was acquitted of a separate set of 40 graft charges in relation with an award of a contract for a foreign visa system (VLN) and one-stop services (OSC) in China when he was home minister. At the time, the High Court judge Datuk Mohd Yazid Mustafa found that the prosecution had not made out a prima facie case as it had failed to prove the element of graft. Zahid has since sent letters of representation to the Attorney Generals Chambers with regard to the prosecutions appeal over the VLN case. - The Edge, 4/9/2023 Raja Rozela appointed as judicial commissioner By Rahmat Khairulrijal - December 8, 2023 @ 5:26pm Datuk Raja Rozela Raja Toran was among nine judicial commissioners who received their letters of appointment from Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat. -BERNAMA PIC PUTRAJAYA: The lead prosecutor who had been dropped from Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's corruption trial was appointed as a judicial commissioner. Datuk Raja Rozela Raja Toran was among nine judicial commissioners who received their letters of appointment from Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat today. The other eight are Arziah Mohamed Apandi, the daughter of former attorney-general Tan Sri Apandi Ali, Datuk Hazizah Kassim, Kan Weng Hin, Rosli Yusoff, Gan Techiong, Suriyati Hasimah Mohd Hashim, Maslinda @ Linda Mohd Ainal, and Saiful Azian Mokhtar. Raja Rozela had been the lead prosecutor for two of Zahid's trials involving the misappropriation of funds belonging to Yayasan Akalbudi (YAB) and the 40 charges of corruption in connection with the Foreign Visa System (VLN). On Aug 8, the New Straits Times confirmed that Raja Rozela, 58, had been -year-old was dropped from the Yayasan Akalbudi trial. Attorney-General's Chamber appellate and trial division head Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar had been chosen to replace Raja Rozela as the lead prosecutor before the case was granted discharged not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) by the High Court in September. This was after the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) decided to stop the case based on various new evidence raised by the defence in their representation letters. This was after the High Court granted the deputy prime minister a discharge not amounting to acquittal of 12 criminal breach of trust (CBT) charges, eight counts of bribery and 27 for money laundering, involving scores of millions of ringgit belonging to YAB. - NST, 8/12/2023 Ali Hamsa reveals how Gani Patail was issued termination letter By Sharanjit Singh - August 24, 2020 @ 3:52pm H Former Attorney General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail. - NSTP/File pic KUALA LUMPUR: A former top civil servant in the country today revealed how former Attorney General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail was handed his termination letter in the wake of the 1Malaysia Dvelopment Bhd (1MDB) scandal in 2 . Tan Sri Ali Hamsa, who was the chief secretary to the government from 2 to 2018, said he was the one who personally handed the letter to Gani while the latter was at a meeting. Ali touched on the subject when he was questioned by lead prosecutor Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram in Datuk Seri Najib Razak's ongoing trial involving the tampering of the 1MDB audit report. Najib and co-accused Arul Kanda Kandasamy - who is former 1MDB chief executive, listened closely from the dock as Sri Ram asked the 64-year old witness to explain how Gani was given his termination letter. Sri Ram: Did you play any role in the removal of the former Attorney General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail? Ali: I was asked to issue a cover letter and handed this personally to Gani Patail Sri Ram: What did you tell him when you gave him the letter? Ali: I just gave him the letter. He opened it in front of me and read it. After that I left. Earlier, Ali, who is the fourth prosecution witness, said he had served under four prime ministers namely Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and again under Dr Mahathir during his stint in the government. He was called to the stand again today to be cross-examined by Najib's lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah before he was re-examined by Sri Ram. The cross-examination before High Court judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan will continue tomorrow. Datuk Seri Najib Razak arrives at the court ahead of the hearing. - NSTP/FATHIL ASRI. Ali had previously testified that Gani was forced to leave office after Najib lost trust in him. He testified that this happened at a time when then deputy prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had started kicking up a storm about 1MDB in Cabinet meetings and had also met Gani. He also revealed that the letter of Gani's removal was drafted by his assistant in Najib's presence before the latter took it to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be signed. It was reported that Gani was subsequently replaced as AG and the government had then cited the latter's ill health behind his removal. His successor Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali later cleared Najib of any criminal wrongdoing involving 1MDB matters. Najib, 67, is now accused of using his position to order amendments to the 1MDB final audit report that had already been finalised by the Auditor General before it was tweaked again and presented to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). He is accused of committing the offence between Feb 22 and 26, 2016, at the Prime Minister's Department in Putrajaya. Arul Kanda, 44, is accused of abetting Najib in making amendments to the report, at the same place and time. Both face up to 20 years jail and fine, if convicted. - NST, 24/8/2020 Idrus Harun reappointed as AG, to serve one more year Tan Sri Idrus Harun has been reappointed as the attorney general (AG) and would be serving one year under the latest appointment. Picture by Azinuddin Ghazali By IDA LIM Tuesday, 08 Mar 2022 6:14 PM MYT KUALA LUMPUR, March 8 The Malaysian government today announced that Tan Sri Idrus Harun has been reappointed as the attorney general (AG), and that he would be serving one year under the latest appointment. Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Mohd Zuki Ali made the announcement today. It is notified that in line with Article 145(1) of the Federal Constitution, Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-Pertuan Agong has assented to the reappointment of Y Bhg. Tan Sri Idrus bin Harun as attorney general for a period of one (1) year with effect from March 6, 2022, Mohd Zuki said in a brief one-paragraph statement today. Under Article 145(1), the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall, on the advice of the prime minister, appoint a person who is qualified to be a Federal Court judge to be the attorney general. Todays announcement came after Idruss two-year term as attorney general was to officially end on Sunday (March 6). Idrus, now aged 67, was first appointed on March 6, 2020 to be attorney general for a two-year term. Idrus replaced Tan Sri Tommy Thomas who had resigned from the position in late February 2020. Immediately before becoming the attorney general in March 2020, Idrus was serving as a Federal Court judge. Throughout his 42-year career, the Kedah-born Idrus who is also a law graduate from Universiti Malaya had served in multiple positions such as in the Attorney Generals Chambers (AGC) division which is tasked with drafting laws, being the head of the Federal Territory Prosecution Unit, and being a deputy public prosecutor with the AGC. Idrus had also in the past served as senior federal counsel to both the Election Commission and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commissions (MACC) predecessor Anti-Corruption Agency, and also as the solicitor general the second-highest ranked AGC official after the attorney general from 2006 to 2014. He then served as a Court of Appeal judge for about four years, and as Federal Court judge from November 2018 until his March 2020 appointment as attorney general. Idrus is also the older brother of Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Azhar Azizan Harun. Previously, on March 6, which was when Idruss term would have ended, news portal Free Malaysia Today (FMT) had reported Malaysian Bar president AG Kalidas as questioning the seeming delay in making an announcement over whether there has been an extension of Idruss term as attorney general. It would be prudent if the prime minister does not wait until the eleventh hour to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and announce the appointment in the event of vacancy or the extension of the current appointment, Kalidas was quoted as telling FMT. - Malay Mail, 8/3/202 2 Idrus Harun reappointed as AG for six months By New Straits Times - March 3, 2023 @ 9:35am Attorney General Tan Sri Idrus Harun has been re-appointed as the countrys top law officer for a period of six months. KUALA LUMPUR: Attorney General Tan Sri Idrus Harun has been re-appointed as the country's top law officer for a period of six months. In a statement today, Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Mohd Zuki Ali said the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has approved the reappointment in accordance with Clause (1) Article 145 of the Federal Constitution. "His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has approved the re-appointment of Tan Sri Idrus Harun as Attorney General for a period of six months effective from March 6," the statement read.- NST, 3/3/2023

all living within the said housing unit'. It could be 1, 2 or 10-15. Previously, household used to refer to the immediate family unit father, mother and 3-4 kids, but not so anymore. The hardcore poor refers to households with a monthly income of less than RM1,169, while those in absolute poverty have an income of less than RM2,208. The figures determining hardcore poverty and poverty, I believe is still the 2020 figures, but we all know that the Malaysian cost of living, including food prices have been going up and up. Hence, should not the poverty line incomes be reviewed to reflect the real situation today. What is the poverty line income for 2024? Should there be different poverty line income for rural areas and urban areas, as the cost of living differs? Should there be a calculation of poverty line income for an individual, a family unit,.. rather than a household? Poor adults with low income may share the same house, sometimes with 5-15(or more) sharing the same living accommodation? Is the income of RM1,169 sufficient for house rental/etc, utility bills, phone, food for maybe 5 in the household, transportation, clothing, etc? Even for an individual in Malaysia in February 2024, this will be far from adequate, so will it be sufficient even for a family unit with 2/3 kids?In Malaysia, the poor can live sometimes - but then they or their kids may really be malnourished? In Malaysia, the incidence of poverty is defined as the percentage of households that has a gross monthly household income lower than the poverty line income. The government revised the national poverty line to RM2,208 in 2020 from RM980 previously. Consequently, the number of households living under the poverty line increased to 5.6 percent in 2020, according to the latest figures from the World Bank. What exactly did the government do to alleviate 'hardcore' poverty - was it merely a temporary measure of providing sufficient monetary aid to simply increase the household income beyond RM1,169.00? Should it not be a more permanent measures - maybe getting of better employment(permanent) or income generation activities...The Welfare Department talks about skills training, income generating opportunities... Anwar should reveal how hardcore poverty was overcome in the 3 States - KL, Selangor and Negeri Sembilan. Provide skills training and income generation opportunities for productive group, e.g., in agro-based industries through funding, management,training, and marketing programmes Provide welfare aid and other forms of support to eligible applicants Develop self-reliance through mindset change programme With regard to WELFARE AID, should the law be amended to provide for higher welfare aid? Now, for the needy is merely...in 2017 as stated below. Has this been amended? It is important that AID for the poor and needy not simply be up to the government of the day - BUT it must be made a right and obligatory by means of amendments to the relevant Acts of Parliament. Among the help that is available for the poor and elderly in Malaysia is the financial aid of RM300 on a monthly basis. .. Aids available for disabled individuals from the Department of Social Welfare Malaysia are:RM350 monthly income maintenance. This is available for disabled people who are working either under an employer or self-employed with a salary below RM1,200.RM200 monthly financial assistance for disabled individuals without a job..single mothers can apply to receive financial aid to temporarily ease their burden. Child help minimum: RM100 per month, per child..Maximum: RM450 per month if there are more than 4 children involved - Source: 6 government aids and subsidies to help you save money in 2017 Maybe, the Federal Constitution ought to be amended to provide all the right to food, shelter, clothing and healthcare. Maybe another amendment to provide us with the right to a clean and healthy environment. YES, when it is part of the CONSTITUTION, it becomes the government's duty and responsibility to ensure that all in Malaysia enjoys these rights, and for the poor, it becomes the the government's duty and responsibility that they have proper housing, food, shelter,... no more up to the whims and fancy of any government of the day... Employment and steady income can be provided by the government(Federal Government, State Government and Local Government) - the poor can be employed to carry out works like cleaning, grass cutting and management of gardens... many of which is now being done by migrant workers of private companies. A poor family could be housed in a school area, while the father/mother could be employed to maintenance cleanliness of the school and the upkeep of the garden.. the presence of the family also will assist in 'security' of the premises, would it not. .. There are ways in which the government can eliminate poverty. Identifying the poor and the hardcore poor may be assisted by the MANDATORY requirement that all adults must submit Income Tax returns, wherein which they would have to list their gross annual income(from whatever source) - in this way, the government can more easily identify the poor that require assistance. Tax returns irrespective of whether you are liable to pay tax or not?? ZAKAT goes to the State, how can the Federal Government work with State Governments to address the question of poverty in Malaysia(in all 13 States and 3 Federal Territories). There must be coordination? Or should each and every State transmit all monies it collected as Zakat for the Federal Government to use it to deal with poverty? There are 13 States and 3 Federal Territories, and until HARDCORE POVERTY is eliminated in Malaysia, there is nothing to be proud of. Talking about HOUSING - maybe the government to build and have their own housing units to be then rented out to the hardcore and absolute poor at a minimal rental . The availability of low cost houses to be bought may do no good for the poor... LOW COST HOUSING must be used by the intended - not to be rented out or sold for profit to another. Maybe a law that reverts the ownership of low cost housing units, if it is found that the unit is not being used by the intended as required. [There were allegations that in the past, there was much abuse - low cost units ended up with cronies/friends - not in the hands of the truly poor who needed houses. ] No more hardcore poor in KL, Melaka and Negeri Sembilan, says PM Anwar Ibrahim says programme has targeted people in need regardless of race, despite doubts in some communities. FMT Reporters - 15 Feb 2024, 6:48pm Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and ACCCIM president Low Kian Chuan at the Chinese New Year event today. On Anwars right are deputy prime minister Fadillah Yusof and Dewan Rakyat Speaker Johari Abdul. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA: Efforts to eradicate extreme poverty in Kuala Lumpur, Melaka and Negeri Sembilan have been 100% successful, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said. He said this drive to eradicate hardcore poverty encompassed all races and was not specific to Malays, Bernama reported. In Kuala Lumpur, although the majority are Malays, there is a proportionately high Indian population. We have assisted every Indian family in Kuala Lumpur to break free from hardcore poverty. This is our approach, but sometimes we face community leaders who doubt the allocation for Indians. For me, we will address every hardcore poor person, regardless of whether they are Chinese, Malay or Indian. In Kuala Lumpur, Melaka and Negeri Sembilan, based on the figures we have obtained, we have achieved 100% (success), he said at the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysia Chinese New Year celebration in Kuala Lumpur today. Anwar has made eradicating hardcore poverty a key aspect of his Madani agenda. - FMT, 15/2/2024 No more excuses for hardcore poverty, Anwar tells state zakat agencies Published on: Friday, February 16, 2024 By: FMT, Predeep Nambiar Text Size: Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim delivering his speech at the Penang International Zakat Conference at Universiti Sains Malaysia in George Town, Penang, today. GEORGE TOWN: There can be no more excuses for hardcore poverty in the country given the sizeable zakat (tithes) collections in several states, says Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. Anwar said the primary objective of zakat is to help the poor. As such, he said, state zakat authorities are obliged to prioritise the eradication of hardcore poverty. Zakat is not about generating revenue for the country. It is an institution dedicated to eradicating poverty, he said when opening the Penang International Zakat Conference at Universiti Sains Malaysia here. I cannot accept the fact that there are people who remain in the hardcore poor bracket despite states collecting large sums as zakat. Since becoming prime minister in 2022, Anwar has made eradicating hardcore poverty one of his key missions. Yesterday, the prime minister commended the success of efforts to eradicate extreme poverty in Kuala Lumpur, Melaka and Negeri Sembilan. Based on figures we have obtained, we have achieved 100% success in Kuala Lumpur, Melaka and Negeri Sembilan, he said at the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Malaysias (ACCCIM) Chinese New Year celebrations in Kuala Lumpur. Last December, Negeri Sembilan menteri besar Aminuddin Harun announced that his state had successfully eradicated hardcore poverty, with 3,530 households moving out of the lowest bracket of poverty. The hardcore poor refers to households with a monthly income of less than RM1,169, while those in absolute poverty have an income of less than RM2,208. - Daily Express, 16/2/2024 MTEN AGREES TO PROPOSALS TO END HARDCORE POVERTY PM ANWAR November 6, 2023 News KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 6 (Bernama) Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said the National Economic Action Council (MTEN) meeting he chaired today agreed onthree proposals to end hardcorepoverty in the country. Anwar said MTEN agreed that special monthly cash assistance would be considered to overcome the food poverty line (PGK) for householdsunable to participate in income-generating activities due to age and health factors. All agencies and ministries will conduct a review and update the data to confirm the number of recipients whohave been given assistance and generate income exceeding the food PGK in 2023. All agencies need to identify households which can participate in the programme in the remaining three months and be absorbed in other suitableprogrammes, he said in a statement issued after the MTEN meeting today. He added that todays meeting was also informed about the status of implementation and efforts in eliminating hardcore povertyas well as the challenges faced. He said that several efforts and programmes have been implemented by the government to eradicate hardcore poverty, includingprogrammes related to monthly cash assistance, home upgrading, providing business capital, skills training and income-generating activities. These efforts have already been implemented by various ministries and agencies to help people to break away from the shackles of hardcore poverty. Meanwhile, Anwar said the meeting had examined and found that the actual development expenditure was shrinkingevery year, although the budget showed a large increase and this could have a long-term impact on the countrys economic growth. Apart from that, the implementation of development projects which are problematic and experience delays in implementation has caused an increase in costs and impacted the economy negatively. He added that the meeting also found that determining the specifications and cost evaluation of information and communications technology (ICT) projects effectively was difficult to do, and it was alsochallenging to do a cost review processwithout a standard cost estimate. He said the situation could lead to duplication of work and an increase in the cost of ICT projects. In this regard, he added that the government will take immediate action to improve the processes in the implementation of development expenditure (DE) projects. He said this would includethe setting upof an inter-ministerial team, namely the Ministry of Economy; Implementation Coordination Unit (ICU);Ministry of Finance;Public Works Department;Department of Irrigation and Drainage; Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit (MAMPU) and related departmentsto review and prepare a framework on improvement, to be approved by the government. Anwar said other actions were policy decisions towards decentralisation and empowerment of project implementation and control of allocations to implementing agencies, balanced with strict governance. He said another action is a policy decision towards centralisation of ICT project implementation and determination of specifications/costs at MAMPU to control costs and in preparation towards GovTech. BERNAMA Hardcore poverty: It is expensive to be poor By Bernama - June 23, 2023 @ 11:05am In Malaysia, the incidence of poverty is defined as the percentage of households that has a gross monthly household income lower than the poverty line income.- NSTP/ASWADI ALIAS. KUALA LUMPUR: In this quiet little hamlet, smack dab in the middle of the sprawling metropolis that is Kuala Lumpur, dozens of people stand in line patiently to receive food aid, a daily occurrence for many. One woman easily stood out from the throng, her wizened brown countenance setting her apart. She is small and stick-thin, her bony body slightly bowed as if burdened by the passing years and life. Despite that, she is quite spry for her age which she,after several meetings, divulges is 74. She tells Bernama she recently returned to the soup kitchen in Medan Tuanku here, organised by Pertubuhan Tindakan Wanita Islam (Pertiwi), after stopping for a few years. She had no choice after losing her life savings to a scammer, she says. "I lost RM31,000. He (the scammer)told me he was going to give me Eid money. It was like I was hypnotised. I went to the bank, signed the paper. I thought he was going to put the money in, but he took the money out instead. Everything is gone," she said, upset. "I didn't eat for two days. All I could do was cry." What really upsets her is that she feels she has run out of options as she is unable to work and dependent on the RM500 monthly stipend she receivesfrom the Social Welfare Department (JKM) . She contemplates returning to Kelantan where she has family but is afraid her situation will be worse over there. At least here, she says she has a home. She is renting a low-cost apartment unit for RM150 monthly together with her 28-year-old adopted son. A daily wage earner, he gives her money when he can. Otherwise, they both depend on her JKM allowance. So far, her son has not been able to get a permanent position. With the loss of her savings, life has become more precarious. She and her son are likely one major health emergency away from being completely destitute. Even now, she complains of stomach ache and pain in her knees. In this, she is emblematic of the risks and lack of choices some twomillion people living in abject poverty in Malaysia face, an issue Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has vowed to alleviate, if not eradicate. It is an uphill battle, however, with many tangential issues that will need tackling in tandem. THE COST OF BEING POOR In Malaysia, the incidence of poverty is defined as the percentage of households that has a gross monthly household income lower than the poverty line income. The government revised the national poverty line to RM2,208 in 2020 from RM980 previously. Consequently, the number of households living under the poverty line increased to 5.6 percent in 2020, according to the latest figures from the World Bank. For decades, Malaysia has provided assistance to the poor and lower-income groups with targeted subsidies and financial assistance. While it has largely worked, lifting Malaysians from a 50 percent poverty rate in the 1970s to less than 10 percent now, there remain pockets of poverty in rural areas as well as in urban areas. Experts say alleviating hardcore poverty is not that easy although they lauded the effort. While there are many facilities and services available for the poor, gaining access to such services can be a challenge in a multitude of ways. In short, many people in abject poverty cannot afford the cost of being poor. Economist and former Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) commissioner Prof Datuk DrMadeline Berma, who has done a lot of research on poverty,said Malaysia uses the targeted approach method, where the indigent and poor have to register with the government firstand then undergo the process of verification. This can be a stumbling block for many poor people. "You have to be registered in e-kasih (National Poverty Data Bank System) in order for you to qualify for support. So if you are a Penan living seven days walking distance (from the nearest assistance centre) and you don't know about e-kasih then how are you supposed to register?" she said. She said even when people have managed to register themselves, they may still face obstacles such as transportation. Depending on where they live, some can ill-afford the cost of travelling to the district office whichis responsible for disseminating aid and financial assistance to the poor. She gave the example of getting financial aid in Sarawak: "In the old days, the JKM allowance was RM70. The cost of traveling from the longhouse to the district office to get that assistance will cost you about RM30 to RM40 by boat. "For the poor, the most expensive thing in their budget is food. Next is transport. If we can address these two issues, it will help a lot in terms of (alleviating poverty)," she added. For decades, Malaysia has provided assistance to the poor and lower-income groups with targeted subsidies and financial assistance. - File pic ACCESSIBILITY One visually-impairedman Bernama talked to knows very well what it means to spend what little money he has to collect money and assistance to survive. The 62-year-old man, who asked to be identified only as Low, takes a bus from Rawang to Kuala Lumpur and then the MRT to the soup kitchen every day without fail. He gets three packs of free food, consisting of rice, a protein dish and vegetables, for his breakfast, lunch and dinner. He leaves at 11 am every day to make sure he arrives on time so as not to risk the soup kitchen running out of food. He then takes the MRT and bus back home. Low said he receives RM300 a month from JKM. His travelling expenses per month alone come to at least RM110. He lives in an illegal dwelling rent-free on someone else's land which allows him to save a little money. He tries not to spend more than necessary. "What I don't use, I put into (my EPF account). I don't want to use the money," he said, adding he has RM20,000 in the account. He has already earmarked the money for an old folks home when the time comes. He has no family, save for a sister who lives away from him. The house itself is very sparse, he said, equipped only with a kettle, washer, bed and radio. Low said he does not find his daily travel too arduous although he gripes about the state of facilities for the disabled at some of the stations. Being legally blind, the lack of working elevators in some places puts him at risk of falling, Disability advocate Murugeswaran Veerasamy, who prefers to be called Muru, said improving disability access everywhere, not just in public transportation, will help reduce abject poverty overall. Although Malaysia does not have exact figures on the number of disabled people living in abject poverty, research has found that many disabled Malaysians are unable to earn an income. This includes the elderly, who become more physically disabled as they get older, even if they remain mentally alert. "The quota (for hiring disabled persons) in the government sector and private sector is one percent. At the moment, I think only 0.02 percent of employees are disabled whereas this quota system was implemented (decades ago)," said Muru. He and other experts warned that policies to alleviate poverty cannot have a one-size-fits-allkind of solution. As such, Muru said part of disability access means the assistance should be tailored to what the people need. "Identify and separate them and give them the proper assistance so they can contribute to themselves, to the family and to the country. If we give them proper guidance, they can do well," he said. DOCUMENTATION But identification and classification can be a sign of some privilege as well, presenting insurmountable obstacles to some who are hardcore poor. Much of the poverty assistance in Malaysia is reserved for Malaysians which requires documentation. Experts said the lack of documentation among the poor is a common issue that continues the cycle of poverty. Pertiwi president Datuk Munirah Abdul Hamid told Bernama she would not be surprised if the number of people living in abject poverty is higher than the governmental figures. "It's always the privileged who are able to get classification, the rest fall in the margins," she said. Mega, a 38-year-old homeless woman, can attest to the state of limbo being undocumented brings. She used to live with her mother, an Indonesian domestic worker, in a shophouse. She never knew her father who may or may not be Malaysian. Now her mother is dead. She told Bernama she does not have a birth certificate. She has never been to school, only learning how to read and write from friends. She does not know if her parents were married and if her father was Malaysian which would have qualified her for assistance from the government. Being undocumented, she cannot be employed formally which makes it difficult for her to earn an income or afford her HIV medication. Despite her hardship, she is friendly and quick to smile, despite missing some teeth. "Life is hard now. I'm still happy but I miss my mother," she said. Dr Berma said many among the hardcore poor lacked awareness of the importance of getting the necessary documentation. She acknowledged that registering for MyKad was a lengthy process, usually taking a whole day, which is difficult for daily wage earners who may have to give up a day's wages or those who live far away. However, she said it was a necessity. "If they know the importance of their children having their identity cards, then they would really do it," she said, adding the process could be simplified. -- BERNAMA, NST, 23/6/2023